Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedELC Appeal No. E057 of 2023 (Consolidated with ELC Appeal No. E077 of 2023)· [2024] KEELC 3623 (KLR)

Zacharia Baraza t/a Siuma Actioneers & 3 others v Kombe & another (Environment and Land Appeal E057 & E077 of 2023 (Consolidated)) [2024] KEELC 3623 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
30 April 2024
3,724 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~15 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court confirmed that once a magistrate grants and executes a Rule 9 auctioneers order, the court is done and cannot issue further orders.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This judgment disposes of two consolidated appeals, ELC Appeal No. E057 of 2023 (Zacharia Baraza T/A Siuma Auctioneers) and ELC Appeal No. E077 of 2023 (Linda Kasichana Kupalia), against a ruling of Hon. B. M. Cheloti, Principal Magistrate, delivered on 12th June 2023. The lower court had struck out two preliminary objections, restrained proclamation, carting away or sale of proclaimed goods, and set aside orders of 18th April 2023 that had authorised police assistance in levying distress for rent against the Respondent at L.R No. 12832/5 Woodside Villas Karen. The Appellants argued, among other things, that the magistrate became functus officio once the Rule 9 Auctioneers Rules orders of 18th April 2023 were granted and executed, and that substantive orders were made without a fair hearing and outside the scope of the preliminary objections. The Respondent contested the ELC's jurisdiction and sought to cite the Appellants for contempt of orders issued on 29th June 2023. The ELC (E. K. Wabwoto, J) upheld its own jurisdiction, held that the magistrate was functus officio after the police-assistance orders were executed, found no infringement of the right to be heard, and declined the contempt application because the 2nd Appellant held stay orders from Justice M. D. Mwangi. The consolidated appeal was allowed, the ruling and orders of 12th June 2023 were set aside and vacated, and each party was ordered to bear its own costs of the appeal and the proceedings below.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the ELC has jurisdiction to hear the appeal

Holding

The ELC has jurisdiction; the ruling appealed against was made under Order 42(1) and Order 51(1) CPR, and nothing in those provisions bars an appeal; the ELC hears appeals from subordinate courts on environment and land matters

Reasoning

The Respondent argued the appeal belonged elsewhere, citing Section 75 CPA and Order 43 Rule 3. The court found the impugned ruling was made on an application under Order 42(1) and Order 51(1), neither of which bars appeal, and that the ELC has jurisdiction over appeals from subordinate courts in respect of environment and land. The jurisdiction objection therefore failed.

p. 6
02

Whether the Learned Magistrate was functus officio after issuing the orders of 18th April 2023

Holding

Yes; the Rule 9 miscellaneous application sought only police assistance for distress, that relief was granted and executed, so the lower court was functus and erred in making further orders on 12th June 2023

Reasoning

The proceedings were initiated under Rule 9 of the Auctioneers Rules 1997 seeking a specific relief (police assistance). Once orders of 18th April 2023 were granted and executed, nothing remained pending. The court held that the lower court had exhausted its mandate and could not issue further orders, making the 12th June 2023 ruling extraneous and erroneous.

p. 7
03

Whether the Appellants' right to fair hearing was infringed

Holding

No; the record shows the 2nd Appellant was served, appeared, filed submissions on the preliminary objection, and was heard before the ruling

Reasoning

Although interim orders of 4th May 2023 were made final on 12th June 2023, the record showed service, appearance by counsel for the 2nd Appellant on 12th May 2023, directions to file submissions, and confirmation of filing on 30th May 2023 before the ruling date was reserved. There was thus no infringement of the right to be heard.

p. 7
04

Whether the Appellants were in contempt of the orders of 29th June 2023

Holding

No; the 2nd Appellant held stay orders issued by Justice M. D. Mwangi on 3rd July 2023, and contempt requires wilful disobedience of a clear order proved to a high standard

Reasoning

The court restated the elements of contempt and the higher standard of proof, then found on the record that the 2nd Appellant had obtained clear stay orders from Justice M. D. Mwangi. The Respondent therefore failed to establish wilful defiance, and the contempt application dated 11th July 2023 was declined.

p. 8

Legal principles established

#
  • Jurisdiction is everything and flows from the Constitution or legislation; without jurisdiction a court must down its tools
  • A Miscellaneous application filed under Rule 9 of the Auctioneers Rules seeks a specific relief only; once that relief is granted and executed, the court becomes functus officio and cannot issue further orders
  • Contempt requires wilful disobedience of a clear order, proved to a standard higher than balance of probabilities

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The consolidated appeal filed herein is allowed
  2. 2.The Ruling and Orders issued on 12th June 2023 by the lower court are set aside and vacated
  3. 3.Each party to bear own costs of the Appeal and the proceedings before the lower court
On appeal from
Milimani Chief Magistrate's Court (Principal Magistrate)
Miscellaneous Application (filed pursuant to Rule 9 of the Auctioneers Rules, 1997; related to Milimani CM Misc E551 of 2023)
Jurisdiction invoked
Environment and Land Court appellate jurisdiction over subordinate courts in respect of environment and land matters; application brought under Order 42(1) and Order 51(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Zacharia Baraza t/a Siuma Actioneers & 3 others v Kombe & another (Environment and Land Appeal E057 & E077 of 2023 (Consolidated)) [2024] KEELC 3623 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). ELC Appeal No. E057 of 2023 (Consolidated with ELC Appeal No. E077 of 2023). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/3623/eng@2024-04-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.