Masha v Kenga & 3 others (Civil Appeal 36 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 3616 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Kenyan court refused to dismiss a delayed appeal because the missing record was finally complete, and courts prefer hearing cases on their merits.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the appeal should be dismissed or struck out for want of prosecution and incomplete record
The application was dismissed; the appeal should be heard on merit since the record is now complete
Applying County Government of Narok v British Pharmaceuticals Limited, the court weighed prejudice on both sides. The respondent's failure to file the record was occasioned by a missing Lower Court file and typed proceedings. With the record now complete, striking out the appeal without a hearing on merit would defeat substantive justice under the overriding objective and Article 159(2)(d).
Legal principles established
#- In exercising discretion to strike out a pleading or record of appeal, the court must weigh the prejudice to the innocent party against the prejudice to the offending party, guided by the overriding objective and Article 159(2)(d)
- The Court usually aims to sustain a suit rather than strike it out
Court orders
#- 1.The application dated 20 July 2023 is hereby dismissed with no order to costs
- On appeal from
- Lower Court
- Jurisdiction invoked
- appellate jurisdiction over interlocutory orders of the Lower Court; overriding objective under section 1A and 1B of the Civil Procedure Rules and Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Masha v Kenga & 3 others (Civil Appeal 36 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 3616 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). not stated in the judgment as provided. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/3616/eng@2024-05-02
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.