Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedEnvironment and Land Court Appeal (ELC Appeal) from RRT Case No. 159 of 2021· [2024] KEELC 3609 (KLR)

Amondi v Landlord, Presbyterian Church of East Africa Nairobi West Parish & 4 others; Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Interir and Co-ordination of National Government (Interested Party) (Environment and Land Appeal E065 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 3609 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
11 April 2024
3,401 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~14 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court confirmed that the Rent Restriction Tribunal cannot hear cases where no tenancy exists or rent exceeds Kshs. 2,500.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is an appeal to the Environment and Land Court (O. A. Angote, J) against the Rent Restriction Tribunal's judgment of 28th April 2022 in RRT Case No. 159 of 2021. The Appellant, a former hostel tenant of the 1st Respondent paying Kshs. 8,000 monthly, claimed Kshs. 1,960,000 in damages for displacement after he was barred from the premises in September 2019. The 1st Respondent counter-claimed for Kshs. 91,000 in rent arrears. The RRT declined to determine the claim on its merits, holding it lacked jurisdiction over post-tenancy disputes. The Appellant's amended memorandum of appeal sought, among other things, setting aside of the RRT judgment and far-reaching constitutional declarations. The Respondents raised a preliminary objection based on Order 42 Rule 1(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, arguing the memorandum was argumentative and not grounded concisely. The court held the objection lacked merit, gleaning three grounds from the memorandum. On the merits, the court found the Chief's involvement did not constitute interference, the inventory evidence was addressed, and the RRT correctly declined jurisdiction: there was no subsisting landlord-tenant relationship when the claim was filed, and the rent of Kshs. 8,000 exceeded the tribunal's Kshs. 2,500 pecuniary limit. Prayers (e), (f) and (g), raising matters not before the RRT, were not entertained. The appeal was dismissed with costs to the Respondents.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a verbose, argumentative Memorandum of Appeal offending Order 42 Rule 1(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules is incompetent

Holding

The preliminary objection failed; the court gleaned three grounds from the memorandum and addressed them on the merits

Reasoning

Although the memorandum was verbose and abstruse, courts prefer to glean the issues from long-winded memoranda rather than strike out appeals. The court identified three discernible grounds and addressed them, holding the objection had no merit.

p. 5
02

Whether the Chief's involvement amounted to interference with a dispute reserved for the RRT

Holding

No interference; at the time there was no active RRT dispute, and Article 159(2)(c) permits alternative justice systems

Reasoning

When the Chief summoned the Appellant in September 2019, no dispute was pending before the RRT. Further, the Constitution promotes alternative justice systems, so the Chief could attempt to resolve the dispute notwithstanding any tribunal proceedings. The Ombudsman had also found no fault with the Chief's conduct.

p. 6
03

Whether the RRT erred in declining to decide the claim on its merits for want of jurisdiction

Holding

The RRT acted correctly; its jurisdiction was ousted both by the absence of a landlord-tenant relationship when the claim was filed and by the rent of Kshs. 8,000 exceeding the Kshs. 2,500 pecuniary limit

Reasoning

The Rent Restriction Act applies to landlord-tenant relationships. By the claim's filing on 19th February 2021, the tenancy (which ended September 2019) had lapsed. Additionally, the rent payable exceeded the statutory cap, independently ousting jurisdiction. Citing Owners of the Motor Vessel 'Lillian S', a tribunal without jurisdiction must down its tools.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • In the absence of a landlord-tenant relationship, the Rent Restriction Tribunal has no jurisdiction; its jurisdiction is also limited by a rent ceiling of Kshs. 2,500

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The preliminary objection is found to have no merit.
  2. 2.The appeal is dismissed.
  3. 3.Costs awarded to the Respondents.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 42 Rules 1(2) and 2
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(c)
  • Rent Restriction ActPreamble; Section 2
  • Valuers Act3rd Schedule
  • Fair Administrative Action Actgeneral
  • National Police Service Actgeneral
  • National Government Co-ordination Actgeneral
  • Chief's Actgeneral

Cases cited (13)

  • Johakim Abayo vs Mokua Damacline Nyamoita
    [2021] eKLR
  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd vs West End Distributors Ltd.
    (1969) EA 696
  • Speaker of National Assembly vs Njenga Karume
    [2008] 1KLR 425
  • FCS Ltd. vs Odhiambo & 9 Others
    [1987] KLR 182
  • Apex International & Anglo Leasing Finance Ltd vs Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission
    [2012] eKLR
  • Samson Gwer & 5 Others vs Kenya Medical Research Institute & 3 Others
    [2020] eKLR
  • Owners of the Motor Vessel 'Lillian S' vs Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd
    [1989] KLR 1
  • Samuel Kamau Macharia & Another vs Kenya Commercial Bank Limited & 2 Others
    [2012] eKLR
  • Robinson Kiplagat Tuwei vs Felix Kipchoge Limo Langat
    [2020] eKLR
  • Bwire vs Wayo & Sailoki
    (Civil Appeal 032 of 2021) [2022] KEHC 7 (KLR)
  • Abdi Ali Dere v. Firoz Hussein Tundal & 2 Others
    [2013] eKLR
  • Nasri Ibrahim v. IEBC & 2 Others
    [2018] eKLR
  • Selle & another v Associated Motor Boat Co. Ltd & others
On appeal from
Rent Restriction Tribunal
RRT Case No. 159 of 2021
Jurisdiction invoked
Appeal from the Rent Restriction Tribunal under the Rent Restriction Act; appeal before the Environment and Land Court

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Amondi v Landlord, Presbyterian Church of East Africa Nairobi West Parish & 4 others; Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Interir and Co-ordination of National Government (Interested Party) (Environment and Land Appeal E065 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 3609 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Environment and Land Court Appeal (ELC Appeal) from RRT Case No. 159 of 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/3609/eng@2024-04-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.