Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated on the judgment excerpt· [2024] KEELC 3595 (KLR)

Republic v Export Processing Authority; London Distillers (K) Ltd (Exparte Applicant) (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 48 of 2019) [2024] KEELC 3595 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court of Kenya
29 April 2024
4,958 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~20 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court refused to award enhanced Senior Counsel fees because certification was sought too late, after the case had already been settled.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a ruling by the Environment and Land Court at Machakos (A. Nyukuri J) on directions sought by both parties regarding whether the Judge should issue a certificate for costs of Senior Counsel. The underlying judicial review suit, brought by Erdemann Property Limited against the respondent over suspension of its licence to discharge pre-treated effluent into the EPZA main trunk sewer line, was settled by a consent of 4th November 2019 adopted on 19th November 2019, under which the ex parte applicant was to pay the respondent's costs to be taxed. The respondent's party and party bill of costs included enhanced fees on the basis that Senior Counsel Paul Muite was instructed. The taxing officer referred the question of certification to the Judge, and parties filed written submissions. The court analysed the Advocates Act and the Advocates Remuneration Order 2014, holding that paragraph 60 and Schedule 6(1)(iii) permit certification by the Judge only at the trial, on delivery of judgment, or where provided for in a consent. Since certification had not been sought at any of those stages and the consent was silent, the court was functus officio and the question had been raised too late. In any event, the court found nothing complex, difficult or novel in the settled dispute to justify Senior Counsel, applying the Muchiri W'Njuguna requirement that complexity be specifically demonstrated. The court declined to certify for Senior Counsel costs, holding the costs of choosing Senior Counsel ordinarily fall on the instructing party absent justification, and ordered each party to bear its own costs of the determination.

Key legal issues

#
01

Timing and jurisdiction for certification of Senior Counsel costs

Holding

Certification must be given by the Judge at the trial or on delivery of judgment, or be provided for in the parties' consent; it cannot be sought for the first time at taxation, and the Judge is functus officio on the question

Reasoning

Paragraph 60 of the Advocates Remuneration Order requires the Judge to certify under his or her hand at trial or on delivery of judgment. Schedule 6(1)(iii) presupposes a certificate already given by the time of taxation. Where the matter was settled by consent and the consent was silent on certification, neither party nor the taxing officer may seek directions on certification afterwards, as that would be moving the Judge after the fact.

p. 8
02

Whether the settled dispute justified employment of Senior Counsel

Holding

Even setting aside functus officio, the judicial review, contempt and stay applications were simple, ordinary and non-novel, and did not reasonably and properly require Senior Counsel

Reasoning

The dispute concerned suspension of an effluent discharge permit and was resolved by consent; the issues are ones courts routinely handle, no complexity, novelty or difficulty was specified, the document volumes were ordinary, and interpretation of Regulation 12 of the Water Quality Regulations - in force and applied for over a decade and a half - does not of itself create complexity requiring Senior Counsel.

p. 8

Legal principles established

#
  • Certification for costs of Senior Counsel is a matter for the Judge's discretion, exercised only where it was reasonable and proper to employ Senior Counsel, having regard to the amount recovered or paid, and the nature, importance, difficulty or complexity of the case
  • Where a party invokes complexity to justify instructing Senior Counsel, the complexity must be specifically demonstrated
  • The costs of instructing Senior Counsel of a party's own choice ordinarily fall on the instructing party absent reasonable and proper justification

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The court declined to certify for costs of Senior Counsel, holding that it is functus officio on that question
  2. 2.Each party to bear its own costs of the determination

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Advocates ActSection 2
  • Advocates ActSection 17
  • Advocates ActSection 20
  • Advocates Remuneration Order 2014Paragraph 60
  • Advocates Remuneration Order 2014Schedule 6 (1) (iii)
  • Advocates (Senior Counsel Conferment and Privileges) Rules 2011Rule 7
  • Advocates (Senior Counsel Conferment and Privileges) RulesRule 19
  • Environmental Management and Coordination (Water Quality) Regulations 2006Regulation 12
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 53

Cases cited (4)

  • Premchand Raichand Limited v Quarry Services of East Africa Limited (No. 3)
    [1972] EA 162
  • Kenya Commercial Bank Limited v John Benjamin Wanyama
    [2007] eKLR
  • Republic v Minister for Agriculture & 2 others Ex Parte Samuel Muchiri W'Njuguna & 6 others
    [2006] eKLR
  • Republic vs Kenyatta University & another ex parte Wellington Kihato Wamburu
    [2018] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Advocates Act and the Advocates Remuneration Order 2014 (Paragraph 60 and Schedule 6(1)(iii)) on certification by the Judge of costs of Senior Counsel

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Republic v Export Processing Authority; London Distillers (K) Ltd (Exparte Applicant) (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 48 of 2019) [2024] KEELC 3595 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated on the judgment excerpt. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/3595/eng@2024-04-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.