Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedOriginating Summons dated 10/12/2019 (ELC, Thika)· [2024] KEELC 3580 (KLR)

Harun (Trading as Nelson Harun & Company Advocates) v Kaluworks Limited & another (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons 181 of 2019) [2024] KEELC 3580 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
9 April 2024
2,166 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Thika Environment and Land Court confirmed a landowner's title and awarded him rental compensation for every year the property was wrongfully withheld.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiff filed an Originating Summons dated 10/12/2019 under Order 37 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Rules and the Environment and Land Court Act, seeking a declaration that he is the bona fide beneficial owner of LR No. 4953/1421 (IR 37819), an order for his registration as proprietor, mesne profits based on lost market rental income, and costs. The claim flowed from judgments in ELC No. 937 of 2013 (17/12/2014) and Civil Appeal No. 249 of 2015 (1/12/2017, Booth Extrusions Limited v Dumbeyia Nelson Muturi Harun), which found the 2nd Defendant bound to convert the title to the property in settlement of legal fees. The Defendants, though served, did not enter appearance or file a defence. At the hearing the Plaintiff relied on his witness statement and written submissions. Framing three issues, the Court held the parties' rights had been conclusively settled by the ELC and Court of Appeal decisions, which bound it, leaving only enforcement; it therefore allowed the declaratory and registration prayers. On mesne profits, the Court applied the principle that mesne profits are special damages requiring specific pleading and proof, found the Defendants had not controverted the rental valuation evidence, and granted mesne profits from 17/12/2014 to the date of transfer and handover. Judgment was entered accordingly, with no orders as to costs. Delivered at Thika on 9 April 2024 by J G Kemei, J.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the parties' rights over the suit property were already judicially determined

Holding

Yes; the ELC and Court of Appeal judgments conclusively settled beneficial ownership in the Plaintiff, leaving only enforcement

Reasoning

The dispute had been determined by the Environment and Land Court in ELC No. 937 of 2013 (judgment 17/12/2014) and affirmed by the Court of Appeal in Civil Appeal No. 249 of 2015 (1/12/2017). No appeal, vacation or setting aside of those decisions was shown. The Court of Appeal judgment binds this Court; only enforcement remained.

02

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to a declaration of beneficial ownership and registration

Holding

Yes; prayers (a) and (b) were found founded and allowable

Reasoning

Exercising jurisdiction under Article 162(2)(b) and Section 13 of the ELC Act, the Court is mandated to make any order and grant reliefs it thinks fit including declaratory orders. Since the Court of Appeal judgment stood unappealed and unvaried, the Plaintiff was entitled to declaratory orders as to ownership.

p. 4
03

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to mesne profits

Holding

Yes; mesne profits awarded based on the exhibited valuation report, defendants having adduced no rebuttal

Reasoning

Mesne profits must be specifically pleaded and proved like special damages. The Plaintiff claimed Kshs 200,000/- per month from 1/1/2015 for 103 months (Kshs 20.6 Million) relying on a valuation report. The Defendants did not controvert the rental value evidence; in the absence of rebuttal the prayer was granted, calculated from 17/12/2014 to transfer and handover.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • Mesne profits are akin to special damages and must be specifically pleaded and proved
  • A trial court may grant enforcement/declaratory relief giving effect to rights settled by prior judgments of superior courts

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Declared that the Plaintiff is the bona fide beneficial owner of LR No. 4953/1421 (IR 37819) pursuant to the High Court judgment of 17/12/2014 affirmed by the Court of Appeal on 1/12/2017
  2. 2.Ordered that Nelson Muturi Dumbeyia Harun be registered as registered proprietor of LR No. 4953/1421 (IR 37819) upon service of the order and certified copy of the judgment on the Land Registrar, Nairobi
  3. 3.Awarded mesne profits calculated on the basis of lost market rental income from 17/12/2014 to the date of transfer and handover of the property
  4. 4.No orders as to costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1A, 1B, 1C & 3A
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 37 Rule 11
  • Environment and Land Court ActSections 3, 13 & 19
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 rule 13
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 162(2)(b)

Cases cited (5)

  • Booth Extrusions Limited vs. Dumbeyia Nelson Muturi Harun
    ELC No. 937 of 2013 Nairobi (OS)
  • Booth Extrusions Limited vs. Dumbeyia Nelson Muturi Harun
    Civil Appeal No. 249 of 2015 Nairobi
  • Karanja Mbugua & Another vs. Marybin Holding Co. Ltd
    [2014] eKLR
  • Inverugie Investments Ltd vs. Hackett
    [1995] 3 All ER 841; [1995] WLR 713
  • Mwaya Wa Kitavi and Another vs. Peter Kitemwa Muia
    Nrb ELC No. 10 of 2013
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Harun (Trading as Nelson Harun & Company Advocates) v Kaluworks Limited & another (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons 181 of 2019) [2024] KEELC 3580 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Originating Summons dated 10/12/2019 (ELC, Thika). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/3580/eng@2024-04-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.