Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedELC Petition No. 18 of 2021 (OJ)· [2024] KEELC 3530 (KLR)

Mwinzi & 217 others v Tana & Athi Rivers Development Authority & another (Environment & Land Petition 18 of 2021) [2024] KEELC 3530 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
25 January 2024
2,181 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~9 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling on a preliminary objection dated 27.10.2021 raised by the 1st Respondent, Tana & Athi Rivers Development Authority, against a petition and application filed by the Petitioners. The objection had four grounds: that the court lacks jurisdiction to issue conservatory orders staying execution of the judgment of 12 March 2020 and decree of 19 August 2020 in Embu ELC Suit No. 148 of 2017 (TARDA v Joseph Muli Mukuluta & 26 Others); that the petition and application are incurably defective under Sections 7, 8, 34 and 63 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 22 of the Rules concerning execution of decrees; that the petition is a gross abuse of court process; and that the court is functus officio because ownership and occupancy of L.R Nos. 24670, 28671 and 12621 were conclusively adjudicated in the Embu judgment. Both Respondents filed submissions supporting the objection, while the Petitioners relied on Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 13(3) of the Environment and Land Court Act and urged dismissal. Applying the Mukisa Biscuit test that a preliminary objection must be a pure point of law, the court found the 1st Respondent had failed to attach the Embu judgment, decree or proceedings, leaving the court unable to determine the jurisdictional, res judicata and functus officio grounds. The abuse-of-process ground required probing evidence and was not a pure point of law. The objection was dismissed with costs to the Petitioners.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the court lacks jurisdiction to stay execution of the Embu ELC judgment

Holding

Ground not determined because the 1st Respondent did not attach the judgment or decree relied upon

Reasoning

The 1st Respondent objected to the court's power to stay execution of the 12.03.2020 judgment and 19.08.2020 decree in Embu ELC Suit No. 148 of 2017 but did not attach the judgment or decree, leaving the court with no material to evaluate the claim of lack of jurisdiction.

p. 3
02

Whether the petition is res judicata / defective under Sections 7, 8, 34 and 63 CPA and Order 22

Holding

Not upheld; res judicata cannot be established on a preliminary objection without the prior pleadings, judgment and decree

Reasoning

Relying on Beach Villas Limited v Mogeni, the court held that a party asserting res judicata must place the documents of the previous suit before the court. The 1st Respondent failed to attach the judgment, decree or proceedings in Embu ELC No. 148 of 2017, so the court could not determine the issue preliminarily.

p. 4
03

Whether the petition amounts to gross abuse of court process

Holding

Not a pure point of law; improperly raised as a preliminary objection

Reasoning

Determining abuse of process requires ascertaining and probing evidence on contentious issues, which exceeds the limited scope of preliminary objections. The ground is therefore not capable of disposing of the matter without calling evidence and is improperly raised.

p. 4
04

Whether the court is functus officio

Holding

Ground not upheld as the 1st Respondent failed to avail the proceedings and judgment of ELC No. 148 of 2017

Reasoning

The court declined to determine functus officio blindly. Without the pleadings, judgment and proceedings from the Embu suit, it could not establish that ownership and occupancy of L.R Nos. 24670, 28671 and 12621 had been conclusively adjudicated.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A preliminary objection may only be raised on a pure point of law, on the assumption that all facts pleaded by the other side are correct
  • A party raising res judicata as a preliminary objection must place before the court the documents of the previous suits; otherwise the issue must be dealt with at the hearing
  • Abuse of court process is not a pure point of law where ascertaining it requires probing evidence

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Preliminary Objection dated 27.10.2021 is dismissed with costs to the Petitioners

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 7
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 8
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 32
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 63
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 22
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 162(2)(b)
  • Environment and Land Court ActSection 13(3)

Cases cited (13)

  • Samwel Cheboi & 3 Others v Paul Kanda & 4 Others
    (2022) eKLR
  • Yiapas Ole Seese & 4 others v Sakita Ole Narok & 2 others
    (2008) eKLR
  • Invesco Assurance Company Ltd & 2 others v Auctioneers Licensing Board & Anor; Kinyanjui Njuguna & Company Advocates & Anor (Interested parties)
    (2020) eKLR
  • Ibrahim Mungara Mwangi v Francis Ndegwa Mwangi
    (2014) eKLR
  • Owners of Motor Vessel 'Lilian S' v Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd
    (1989) KLR 1
  • Jamal Salim v Yusuf Abdulahi Abdi & Anor
    Civil Appeal No. 103 of 2016 (2018) eKLR
  • The IEBC v Maina Kiai & 5 Others
    (2017)
  • Fortis Tower Management Ltd & Anor v Trendmark Computers Ltd
    (2018) eKLR
  • Equity Bank Ltd v Bruce Mutie Mutuku t/a Diani Tour Travel
    (2016) eKLR
  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd -vs- West End Distributors Ltd
    (1969) EA 696
  • Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission v Jane Cheperenger & 2 Others
    [2015] eKLR
  • DJC v BKL
    (Civil Suit E021 of 2021) [2022] KEHC 10189 (KLR) (27 June 2022) (Ruling)
  • Beach Villas Limited v Mogeni & 4 others
    (Environment & Land Case 6 of 2020) [2022] KEELC 2547 (KLR) (18 July 2022)
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution of Kenya and Section 13(3) of the Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mwinzi & 217 others v Tana & Athi Rivers Development Authority & another (Environment & Land Petition 18 of 2021) [2024] KEELC 3530 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). ELC Petition No. 18 of 2021 (OJ). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/3530/eng@2024-01-25

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.