Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedELC LC No. 9 of 2023 (Kitale)· [2024] KEELC 3299 (KLR)

Gatatha Farmers Company Limited v Chemtingei & 3 others; Kaitet Tea Estates (1977) Limited & another (Interested Parties) (Environment & Land Case 9 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 3299 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court of Kenya
22 April 2024
8,715 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~35 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Kitale Environment and Land Court dismissed a self-appointed litigant's application, confirming you cannot join a case, amend pleadings, or litigate through a power of attorney without court leave.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Kitale (Nyagaka J) delivered on 22 April 2024 on a twelve-prayer Notice of Motion dated 27/10/2023 brought by Peter M. N. Simatwa, a stranger seeking to join the consolidated Kitale ELC LC No. 9 of 2023 litigation concerning LR Nos. 5710/2 and 6137. The application sought the judge's recusal and transfer of the file to Eldoret, review of an earlier ruling, prohibition orders against Kaitet Tea Estates (1977) Limited, leave to amend pleadings and enjoin parties, a medical examination of the 4th Defendant, and approval of a Specific Power of Attorney in favour of Wilfred Ogutu, an unqualified person associated with an NGO. The court framed five issues and determined them sequentially. On recusal, it held the application rested on imagination, not actual or reasonably apprehended bias, and was aimed at forum shopping and intimidation; the judge declined to recuse himself. On joinder, the court found the applicant had self-enjoined without a court order, contrary to Rule 7 of the Mutunga Rules, Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPR and the Muruatetu parameters; further, the underlying suit had been dismissed for want of prosecution on 16/01/2002, so no live suit existed. His purported amendment of pleadings and parties was irregular. On the Power of Attorney, the court held that no law permits litigation through a donee of a power of attorney, since rights of audience belong only to qualified advocates under Sections 9 and 31 of the Advocates Act, which subsidiary rules cannot contradict. The entire application was dismissed with costs to the Applicant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Recusal of the trial judge

Holding

The judge declined to recuse himself; the application was an abuse aimed at forum shopping and intimidation.

Reasoning

The court noted the twin doctrines that a judge must sit and litigants cannot choose their judicial officer. Recusal requires actual bias or an objectively reasonable apprehension of bias. The applicant tendered no evidence of bias, used abusive language, and the application was designed to tarnish the judge and shop for a favourable forum. Recusal applications should not be used for blackmail or arm-twisting.

p. 7
02

Joinder and status of the Applicant as an interested party

Holding

The Applicant was not properly a party; he self-enjoined without a court order, rendering his prayers irregular and premature.

Reasoning

Under Rule 7 of the Mutunga Rules and Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPR, joinder as an interested party requires an application with leave or the court's own motion. Applying Muruatetu, the applicant demonstrated no proximate identifiable stake, no prejudice, and no distinct submissions. Moreover, the underlying suit had been dismissed for want of prosecution on 16/01/2002, so no live suit existed to which he could be joined.

p. 9
03

Amendment of pleadings without leave

Holding

A non-party cannot unilaterally amend the heading, parties or pleadings of a suit, and cannot amend an adverse party's pleadings.

Reasoning

While courts have wide discretion to allow amendments at any stage, voluntary amendment after the close of pleadings is discretionary, not a right. The applicant, not being on record, fundamentally altered the heading, added and removed parties, and sought amendments for other parties. In an adversarial system a party cannot amend pleadings of the adverse party.

p. 7
04

Recognition of a Power of Attorney for litigation

Holding

Approval of the Power of Attorney was refused; a donee of a power of attorney cannot conduct litigation as only qualified advocates may act as advocates.

Reasoning

Order 9 rules 1 and 2 CPR permit appearance through a recognised agent holding a power of attorney, but subject to court approval and limited in scope. Relying on Mwongo J in Khanjira, the court held that rights of audience, pleading and examining witnesses are acts of advocacy reserved to qualified persons. Section 31 of the Advocates Act prohibits unqualified persons acting as advocates; subsidiary rules cannot contradict the Act. No agreement can waive public law.

p. 13

Legal principles established

#
  • Litigants have no right to choose which judicial officer hears their case; recusal requires actual bias or a reasonable objective apprehension of bias
  • A person cannot participate meaningfully in proceedings, make prayers or amend pleadings before being joined as an interested party by court order
  • No law permits litigation through a donee of a Power of Attorney; only admitted advocates with practising certificates may act as advocates, and subsidiary rules cannot contradict the Advocates Act
  • Costs follow the event under Section 27 of the Civil Procedure Act

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Judge declined to recuse himself from the suit
  2. 2.The entire Notice of Motion dated 27/10/2023 was dismissed with all prayers not granted

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1, 1B, 3, 3A, 27
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 1 Rules 1, 3, 6, 8, 10(2); Order 2 Rules 5, 7, 9, 11; Order 3 Rules 4, 7; Order 4 Rule 4; Order 9 Rules 1, 2; Order 40 Rules 1, 2, 3; Order 51 Rules 1, 3, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 48, 50, 50(1), 50(2)(g), 159(2)(a), 162, 165, 259(1)
  • Judicature ActSection 6
  • Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) Practice and Procedure Rules, 2013 (Mutunga Rules)Rules 2, 7
  • Advocates ActSections 9, 10, 31, 83
  • NGO Co-ordination ActSections 12(3)(a), 24
  • Legal Aid ActSection 2
  • Indian Code of Civil ProcedureOrder III Rule 1

Cases cited (15)

  • Uganda Polybags Ltd v Development Finance Company Ltd and Others
    [1999] 2 EA 337
  • DPP v Charles Kiprotich Tanui & 2 Others
    Nairobi HC Anti-Corruption Criminal Revision Number E003 of 2024
  • Khan v Roshan
    [1965] EA 289
  • Josphat Oginda Sasia v Wycliffe Wabwile Kiiya
    [2022] eKLR
  • James Ndung'u Kero v Chief Land Registrar, Director of Survey & Attorney General
    (Environment & Land Case E046 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 1446 (KLR)
  • Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance v Mumo Matemu & 5 others
    (2014) eKLR, Supreme Court Petition No. 12 of 2013
  • Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another v R & 5 others
    (2016) eKLR, Supreme Court Petition 15 & 16 of 2015 (Consolidated)
  • HOPF v Director of Survey & 2 others; Sakaja & 2 others (Interested Party)
    (Environment & Land Case 4 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 6 (KLR)
  • Samuel Kamau Macharia & another v DPP & 11 Others
    (Petition No. 9 (E011) of 2022)
  • SOCAF & Company Limited v John Maina Njoroge & 5 Others; Francis Ngau Musyoki (Interested Party)
    [2022] eKLR
  • Tom Kusienya & Others v Kenya Railways Corporation & Others
    [2013] eKLR
  • Jack J. Khanjira and Anor v Safaricom Ltd
    [2012] eKLR
  • Swallow and Pearson (a firm) v Middlesex County Council
    [1953] 1 All E.R. 580
  • Killian Mwiinga (Suing as Attorney for Gregory Mainza) v Emmanuel Chama and Ors
    (2023/HP/0505) [2023] ZMHC 13
  • Republic v Fredrick Ole Leliman & 4 others
    [2016] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 1, 1B, 3 & 3A of the Civil Procedure Act; Order 40 and Order 51 of the Civil Procedure Rules; Articles 50, 162, 165, 259(1) of the Constitution; Section 6 of the Judicature Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Gatatha Farmers Company Limited v Chemtingei & 3 others; Kaitet Tea Estates (1977) Limited & another (Interested Parties) (Environment & Land Case 9 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 3299 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). ELC LC No. 9 of 2023 (Kitale). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/3299/eng@2024-04-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.