Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedBusiness Premises Rent Tribunal Appeal (Nairobi) - from Nairobi BPRT Case No. E482 of 2021· [2024] KEELC 1801 (KLR)

Kenya Railways Corporation & another v Okuthe t/a La Place Restaurant (Environment and Land Appeal E013 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 1801 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
22 February 2024
2,009 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court confirmed that a tenant without a formal lease still counts as a protected tenant, and the BPRT can award damages against landlords.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a first appeal from the Business Premises Rent Tribunal in Nairobi BPRT Case No. E482 of 2021, in which the Tribunal had upheld the tenant's Reference, awarded damages of Kshs 1,345,400/- with interest and costs. The Appellants (landlords) raised grounds including absence of a subsisting landlord-tenant relationship (the lease having expired on 31st May 2021), lack of jurisdiction to assess damages, failure to strictly prove special damages, and the impropriety of a conclusive damages award at an interlocutory stage. The Court framed three issues: existence of a landlord-tenant relationship at filing of the reference, the Tribunal's power to assess and award damages, and costs. On the first issue, the Court found a controlled tenancy subsisted: the Respondent had occupied since 1997, and the disputed offer of lease of 9th August 2021 varying terms gave rise to the reference; the absence of a formal agreement was construed for the tenant's protection under the Preamble to Cap 301. On the second issue, the Court held that the Tribunal's assessment of the Respondent's loss flowing from the Appellants' breach of the Tribunal's orders was an assessment of damages, not execution proceedings, and was therefore within the Tribunal's powers under Section 12 of Cap 301. The appeal was dismissed with an order that each party bear their own costs of the appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Existence of a controlled tenancy at the time of filing the reference

Holding

A controlled tenancy existed between the parties notwithstanding that the formal lease had expired and the offer of lease of 9th August 2021 was disputed

Reasoning

The Respondent took up the premises in 1997; management passed from the 1st to the 2nd Appellant in 2007 and back to the 1st Appellant in 2021. The 1st Appellant's offer of lease dated 9th August 2021 varied the tenancy terms (6 months, quarterly rent in advance at Kshs 249,284). The Respondent's challenge to those varied terms gave rise to a controlled tenancy under Cap 301, conferring jurisdiction on the Tribunal.

p. 4
02

Tribunal's power to assess and award damages

Holding

The Tribunal validly assessed the Respondent's loss flowing from the Appellants' breach of the Tribunal's orders; this was assessment, not execution, and within Section 12 of Cap 301

Reasoning

The Appellants contended that a Tribunal cannot enforce its own orders, relying on Cap 401. The Court distinguished assessment of damages from execution proceedings: the Tribunal merely quantified the loss caused by the Appellants' disobedience of its orders, which did not amount to execution and was therefore lawful.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • The absence of a formal lease agreement at the time of filing a reference does not defeat the existence of a landlord-tenant relationship; a controlled tenancy may subsist and the gap is construed for the protection of the tenant under Cap 301
  • A Tribunal's assessment of a tenant's loss flowing from a landlord's breach of the Tribunal's orders is an assessment of damages, not execution proceedings, and is within the Tribunal's powers under Section 12 of Cap 301

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The appeal is dismissed
  2. 2.Each party to bear own costs of the appeal

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Landlords and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act (Cap 301)Section 12; Preamble
  • Cap 401 (as cited by the Appellant regarding enforcement of orders)Section 14

Cases cited (13)

  • Michael Gachie Mwarangu vs Peter Gicheru Maina and 2 others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Republic vrs. Chairperson Business Premises Rent Tribunal at Nairobi & Another Exparte Suraj Housing & Properties Limited & 2 others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Republic vrs. Business Premises Rent Tribunal & Another Exparte Davies Motor Corporation Limited
    [2013] eKLR
  • Travel Planners Limited vs Managing Director, Kenya Railways Corporation & Another
    [2008] eKLR
  • Kemfro Africa Limited t/a Meru Express Services [1976] & Another vs Lubia and Another (No.2)
    [1985] eKLR
  • Johnson Evan Gicheru vs Andrew Morton & Another
    [2005] eKLR
  • Hyrdo Water Well (K) Limited vs Sechere & 2 others
    Civil Suit E212 of 2019 [2021] KEHC 22 [KLR]
  • Siree –vs- Lake Turkana El Molo Lodges
    (2002) 2 EA 521
  • Raphael M. Muju -vs- Direcotr Social Services & Housing & 3 others
    (2015) eKLR
  • Capital Fish Limited -vs- Kenya Power and Lighting Company Limited
    (2016) eKLR
  • David Bagine -vs- Martin Bundi
    (1997) eKLR
  • Lena Sarange -vs- Robert Oyieko Angoi
    [2020] eKLR
  • Migiro -vs- Paintmart and Allied Building Equipment [K] Limited
    (Civil Suit E448 of 2021) [2023] KEELC 18523 (KLR)
On appeal from
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Nairobi BPRT Case No. E482 of 2021
Jurisdiction invoked
First appellate jurisdiction over the decision of the Business Premises Rent Tribunal under the Landlords and Tenant (Shops, Hotels and Catering Establishments) Act (Cap 301)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenya Railways Corporation & another v Okuthe t/a La Place Restaurant (Environment and Land Appeal E013 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 1801 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Business Premises Rent Tribunal Appeal (Nairobi) - from Nairobi BPRT Case No. E482 of 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/1801/eng@2024-03-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.