Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutNot stated in judgment (application dated 2/6/2022, ruling on notice of preliminary objection dated 22/9/2022)· [2024] KEELC 1697 (KLR)

Hon. Attorney General on Behalf of the District Land Registrar, Kajiado v Bounty Gardens Limited & 2 others (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 2 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 1697 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
8 April 2024
793 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court struck out a land-sale dispute because it was really a money-refund claim, which belongs in ordinary civil courts.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling by the Environment and Land Court at Kajiado (M.N. Gicheru, Judge) on a preliminary objection dated 22/9/2022 raised by the first respondent against the applicant's Miscellaneous Application dated 2/6/2022, which sought to found on Kajiado CMCC No. 97 of 2019. The respondents argued that the lower court suit was a civil, not an environment and land matter, so the ELC lacked jurisdiction under Articles 162(2) and 165(5)(b) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the ELC Act; that the concluded suit was res judicata; that commencement by miscellaneous application was improper; and that the matter was vexatious and an abuse of process. The applicant countered that the lower court sat as an ELC court, the dispute concerned land parcel Ngong/Ngong/2318 and an alleged botched sale, and magistrates' courts enjoy ELC jurisdiction under Section 24(2) of the ELC Act. The court held that jurisdiction must be determined first, applying the Owners of Motor Vessel 'Lillian' principle. Testing the plaint against Article 162(2)(b), it found the suit sought only refund of the purchase price and general damages - not environmental redress, use, occupation or title to land - and was therefore civil in nature despite its ELC label. The court struck out the matter for want of jurisdiction, with costs to the respondents.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the underlying suit, Kajiado CMCC No. 97 of 2019, was a civil or an environment and land matter

Holding

It was a civil matter because the plaint sought only refund of the purchase price and general damages, not environmental redress, use, occupation or title to the land

Reasoning

The court applied the Article 162(2) test, which confines ELC jurisdiction to four areas: environment, use of land, occupation of land, and title to land. Examining the plaint, it sought a refund of Ksh 8,319,434, general damages, costs and interest after a botched sale of Ngong/Ngong/2318. None of the four jurisdictional heads was engaged, so the suit fell outside the ELC's narrow jurisdiction despite being described as an ELC case.

p. 3
02

Whether this court has jurisdiction to hear the applicant's application dated 2/6/2022

Holding

No; the court has no jurisdiction to entertain the matter

Reasoning

Since the underlying suit was civil rather than an environment and land cause, the intended appeal belongs to the High Court, not the ELC. Jurisdiction being foundational, once found lacking the court must down its tools. The objection also invoked abuse of process and res judicata, but the court disposed of the matter on jurisdiction alone.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • The ELC test under Article 162(2)(b) confines the court's jurisdiction to environment, use of land, occupation of land and title to land
  • Whether a suit is an ELC matter is determined by the relief sought, not the label on the pleadings

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The suit (Miscellaneous Application) is struck out for want of jurisdiction
  2. 2.Costs to the respondents

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya 2010Article 162(2)(b)
  • Constitution of Kenya 2010Article 165(5)(b)
  • Environment and Land Court Act (Act No. 19 of 2011)Section 13
  • Environment and Land Court ActSection 24(2)

Cases cited (2)

  • Owners of Motor Vessel "SS Lillian"
    [1989] KLR
  • Christopher Wafula Mutoro v Richard Lordia Lokere
    [2017] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 162(2) and 165(5)(b) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 as read with Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act (Act No. 19 of 2011)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Hon. Attorney General on Behalf of the District Land Registrar, Kajiado v Bounty Gardens Limited & 2 others (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 2 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 1697 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in judgment (application dated 2/6/2022, ruling on notice of preliminary objection dated 22/9/2022). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/1697/eng@2024-04-08

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.