Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedMisc Application No E117 of 2022· [2024] KEELC 1679 (KLR)

Njenga Mwaura & Co Advocates v Urithi Housing Co-operative Limited (Miscellaneous Application E117 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 1679 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
19 March 2024
542 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The High Court confirmed that once legal fees are taxed and a certificate issued, clients who don't challenge it can face immediate judgment.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by the High Court at Nairobi (M.D. Mwangi, J) determined an Advocate's Notice of Motion dated 22nd January 2024 seeking entry of judgment for taxed advocate-client costs of Kshs. 117,377.20/= pursuant to a certificate of taxation issued on 8th November 2023. The application was supported by an affidavit of Robert Njenga Mwaura sworn on 22nd January 2024, attaching the certificate of taxation. Although duly served, with an affidavit of service filed, the Respondent filed no response. The court framed a single issue: whether judgment should be entered in favour of the Advocate/Applicant as prayed. Relying on section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the court held that a taxing officer's certificate is final as to the amount of costs unless set aside or altered by the Court, and that where the retainer is not disputed the Court may order judgment for the certified sum. The court applied the decision in Lubulellah & Associates Advocates v N. K. Brothers Limited [2015] eKLR, which states that once costs are taxed and a certificate issued with no reference or alteration, no other action is required save to enter judgment. The court entered judgment for the Applicant against the Respondent for Kshs. 117,377.20/= with interest at court rates from the date of the ruling until payment in full, and awarded the Applicant the costs of the application. The ruling was delivered virtually at Nairobi on 19th March 2024.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether judgment should be entered for the taxed advocate-client costs

Holding

Yes - the certificate of taxation was unchallenged and unaltered, so judgment was entered for the certified sum with interest.

Reasoning

The court relied on section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, which makes a taxing officer's certificate final unless set aside or altered. The respondent was duly served but filed no response and did not dispute the retainer or the taxed sum. Applying Lubulellah & Associates Advocates v N. K. Brothers Limited, no further action was required beyond entering judgment for the certified amount, with interest and costs of the application.

Legal principles established

#
  • A certificate of taxation is final as to the amount of costs covered unless set aside or altered by the Court, and where the retainer is not disputed the Court may enter judgment for the certified sum.
  • Where a certificate of costs has been issued and there is no reference against the taxing master's ruling, the court need only enter judgment.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered in favour of the Advocate/Applicant against the Respondent for Kshs. 117,377.20/= with interest at court rates from the date of the ruling until payment in full
  2. 2.The Advocate/Applicant awarded the costs of the application

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Advocates ActSection 51(1) and (2)

Cases cited (1)

  • Lubulellah & Associates Advocates v N. K. Brothers Limited
    [2015] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 51 of the Advocates Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Njenga Mwaura & Co Advocates v Urithi Housing Co-operative Limited (Miscellaneous Application E117 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 1679 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Misc Application No E117 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/1679/eng@2024-03-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.