Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedELC Case at Eldoret (Environment and Land Court)· [2024] KEELC 1567 (KLR)

Kobilo Farm Limited & another v Elfam Limited; Commodities Fund (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Case 24 of 2020) [2024] KEELC 1567 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
14 March 2024
5,594 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~22 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A land buyer in Kenya who fails to pay the balance on time loses the deal, forfeits a 10% deposit, and can even pay damages for trespass.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
Elfam (1st defendant) sold land to Metropole under two agreements of 9.7.2018, later superseded by backdated fresh agreements with Kobilo (1st plaintiff) for Sergoit/Koiwoptaoi Blocks 13/9 and 13/4 at a total price of Kshs 205,000,000/=. Block 13/9 was transferred and titled to Kobilo; Block 13/4, charged to the interested party, remained contested. Kobilo paid Kshs 194,000,000/=, leaving Kshs 11,000,000/=. After a 21 days' default notice of 15.10.2019 and a termination letter of 27.11.2019, Elfam treated the agreement as rescinded. The plaintiffs sought specific performance, a declaration of ownership, an injunction and damages; Elfam counterclaimed for declarations of ownership and breach, rescission, forfeiture of the 10% deposit, an injunction and damages. The court held Kobilo was in breach, that payment was not conditional on discharge of the charge, and that the agreement was lawfully rescinded once time was made of essence. Reliance on WhatsApp messages admitted without objection on 17.10.2022 supported the finding of non-payment despite promises. The plaintiffs' claim failed save for a refund less the forfeited 10% deposit. The defendant proved trespass and was awarded Kshs 10,000,000/= general damages, declarations, forfeiture of the deposit with interest, liberty to resell, a permanent injunction against the plaintiffs, and costs with interest. Judgment delivered at Eldoret on 14th March 2024 by E. O. Obaga, Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Breach of the sale agreement

Holding

Kobilo was in breach by failing to clear the balance of Kshs 11,000,000/= on the completion date

Reasoning

Payments totalled Kshs 194,000,000/= against a price of 205,000,000/=. WhatsApp messages admitted without objection on 17.10.2022 showed Mr. Maina promising to clear the balance by end of October 2019 but going quiet. No evidence showed the balance had been deposited with plaintiffs' advocates. The defendant was ready to complete.

p. 8
02

Payment subject to discharge of charge

Holding

The agreement contained no clause making payment conditional on discharge of the charge over the suit property

Reasoning

The court examined the agreement and found no stipulation that the balance was payable only upon discharge of the interested party's charge. The plaintiffs should have paid and then sought specific performance if the defendant refused completion documents.

03

Lawful rescission of the agreement

Holding

The agreement was lawfully rescinded time having been made of essence by the notice of 15.10.2019

Reasoning

A 21 days' default notice of 15.10.2019 and a termination letter of 27.11.2019 were addressed to Mr. Maina, who did not testify to deny receipt. The parties had conducted business outside strict contractual terms; the court gave effect to their intention as far as possible.

p. 9
04

Trespass and damages

Holding

Defendant proved trespass and was awarded general damages of Kshs 10,000,000/=

Reasoning

Plaintiffs' director invaded the suit property, cut trees, destroyed dairy structures and erected structures and a pit latrine contrary to the status quo order; structures remained on the land. Considering the continuous trespass, cleared trees and land value, Kshs 10,000,000/= was adequate.

p. 10

Legal principles established

#
  • A court of law cannot rewrite a contract between the parties; parties are bound by their contractual terms unless coercion, fraud or undue influence are pleaded and proved
  • Specific performance is discretionary and will be refused where the plaintiff is not ready and willing, or where it would cause hardship to the defendant
  • Failure to testify by a party who recorded a witness statement permits an adverse inference where the omitted evidence would be adverse

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Plaintiffs shall be refunded the amount paid in respect of the aborted agreement for LR No Sergoit/Koiwoptaoi Block 13/4 less the 10% deposit which is forfeited to the defendant
  2. 2.A declaration that the defendant is the legal, bonafide and indefeasible owner of LR Number Sergoit/Koiwoptaoi Block 13/4
  3. 3.A declaration that the plaintiffs breached the terms of the sale agreement dated 9th July, 2018 by failing to complete the purchase price
  4. 4.A declaration that the agreement between the plaintiffs and the defendant stands rescinded and the 10% deposit paid stands forfeited to the defendant together with the accrued interest at court rates
  5. 5.The defendant is at liberty to sell LR No Sergoit/Koiwoptaoi Block 13/4 pursuant to the aborted agreement
  6. 6.General damages of Kshs 10,000,000/= for trespass
  7. 7.A permanent injunction restraining the plaintiffs, their agents, servants and/or any person whatsoever from trespassing, entering, selling, transferring, charging and/or dealing in any manner with land parcel LR No Sergoit/Koiwoptaoi/Block 13/4
  8. 8.Costs of the suit and counter-claim to the defendant
  9. 9.Interest on the forfeiture, general damages and costs at court rates
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kobilo Farm Limited & another v Elfam Limited; Commodities Fund (Interested Party) (Environment & Land Case 24 of 2020) [2024] KEELC 1567 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). ELC Case at Eldoret (Environment and Land Court). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/1567/eng@2024-03-14

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.