Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNot stated in the judgment· [2024] KEELC 1509 (KLR)

Njenga Mwaura & Co. Advocates v Urithi Housing Co-operative Limited (Miscellaneous Application E115 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 1509 (KLR)

High Court of Kenya
19 March 2024
542 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~2 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan High Court confirmed that once legal fees are taxed and certified, clients who don't respond face automatic judgment plus interest.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling determines an Advocate's Notice of Motion dated 22nd January 2024 seeking entry of judgment for the taxed Advocate-Client costs of Kshs. 175,125.02/= pursuant to a certificate of taxation issued on 8th November 2023 following taxation of the Advocate-Client bill of costs. The application was supported by the affidavit of Robert Njenga Mwaura, which annexed the certificate of taxation. Although duly served, with an affidavit of service filed, the Respondent did not file a response. M.D. Mwangi J framed the sole issue as whether judgment should be entered for the Advocate as prayed. Relying on section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the court held that a taxing officer's certificate is final as to the amount of costs covered unless set aside or altered by the court, and that where the retainer is not disputed the court may order judgment for the certified sum. The court applied the decision in Lubulellah & Associates Advocates v N. K. Brothers Limited [2015] eKLR, which holds that once costs have been taxed and a certificate issued without a reference or alteration, no further action is required of the court save to enter judgment. The court entered judgment for the Advocate/Applicant against the Respondent for Kshs. 175,125.02/=, with interest at court rates from the date of the ruling until payment in full, and awarded the Advocate the costs of the application as prayed.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether judgment should be entered for the Advocate on the taxed Advocate-Client bill of costs

Holding

Yes. The certificate of taxation dated 8th November 2023 was not set aside or altered, so the court entered judgment for the certified sum of Kshs. 175,125.02/= with interest.

Reasoning

Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act makes the taxing officer's certificate final as to the amount of costs unless set aside or altered by the court. The Respondent was served with the application but filed no response, so the retainer and the certified amount stood undisputed. Following Lubulellah & Associates Advocates v N. K. Brothers Limited, once costs have been taxed and the certificate issued without a reference or alteration, the only remaining judicial act is entry of judgment.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • A certificate of taxation is final as to the amount of costs covered unless set aside or altered by the court, and where the retainer is not disputed the court should enter judgment for the certified sum.
  • Where a certificate of costs has been issued and is not the subject of a reference or has not been set aside or altered, the court's only remaining action is to enter judgment.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Judgment entered in favour of the Advocate/Applicant against the Respondent for Kshs. 175,125.02/= with interest at court rates from the date of the ruling until payment in full
  2. 2.The Advocate/Applicant awarded the costs of the application as prayed

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Advocates ActSection 51(1) and (2)

Cases cited (1)

  • Lubulellah & Associates Advocates v N. K. Brothers Limited
    [2015] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 51 of the Advocates Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Njenga Mwaura & Co. Advocates v Urithi Housing Co-operative Limited (Miscellaneous Application E115 of 2022) [2024] KEELC 1509 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/1509/eng@2024-03-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.