Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in the judgment· [2024] KEELC 1348 (KLR)

Kiambu Dandora Farmers Co. Ltd v Waindi & 12 others (Environment & Land Case E234 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 1348 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
12 March 2024
2,973 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court threw out a landowners' lawsuit because the same land dispute was already being handled in other Kenyan courts.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi (Lucy N. Mbugua, J) delivered on 12 March 2024 on the Plaintiff's Notice of Motion dated 23 June 2023 and four preliminary objections filed by the 1st, 2nd/4th/9th, and 3rd/8th Defendants. The Plaintiff sought interim injunctive and conservatory orders restraining dealings on land parcel LR 11379/3, maintenance of status quo, deposit of rent by occupants, and enforcement by the Inspector General. It claimed to have acquired the land in 1970 for its members, relying on a 1972 High Court declaration, and complained of subdivisions and constructions on the property. The Defendants objected that the suit was res judicata and sub judice, citing Milimani CMELC E418 of 2022 (wherein injunctive orders were issued against the Plaintiff and subsist), Nairobi ELC Petition No. 9 of 2019 (where the Plaintiff's officials were convicted of contempt), ELC 249 of 2007 (Francis Lekolol v Kiambu Dandora Housing Scheme), and the judicial review decision in Republic v National Land Commission [2021] eKLR; they also pleaded limitation under Section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act and want of jurisdiction. The court framed two issues: whether the preliminary objections were merited and, if not, whether the application met its threshold. Applying Sections 6 and 7 of the Civil Procedure Act and the substance-over-prayers approach, the court found the suit duplicated issues pending in multiple fora, violating the sub-judice rule. All preliminary objections were upheld; the application and the entire suit were dismissed with costs to the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 9th, 3rd, 8th and 6th Defendants. The merits of the injunctive relief were never reached.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the suit is sub judice and/or res judicata in light of multiple pending and decided cases over LR 11379/3

Holding

The suit is sub judice to Milimani CMELC E418 of 2022, Nairobi ELC Petition No. 9 of 2019, ELC 249 of 2007 and other matters; it violates the sub-judice rule and is incompetent. All preliminary objections succeed.

Reasoning

The court found more than six cases relating to the suit parcel pointed out in the pleadings, with injunctive orders and contempt findings against the Plaintiff which it never rebutted. Applying Sections 6 and 7 of the Civil Procedure Act, and looking at the substance rather than the prayers of the claim, the court held that filing the instant suit duplicated issues already before other courts and amounted to abuse of process.

p. 6
02

Whether the Plaintiff met the threshold for interim injunctive and conservatory orders

Holding

Not determined on the merits, as the suit was dismissed on the preliminary objections.

Reasoning

Having found all four preliminary objections merited on the sub-judice ground, the court did not need to reach the Giella v Cassman Brown inquiry. The application fell with the suit.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • In determining whether sub judice applies, the substance of the claim rather than the prayers sought is decisive
  • Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act bars parallel proceedings to prevent abuse of court process and conflicting decisions
  • Multiplicity of actions on the same matter between the same parties amounts to abuse of court process

Court orders

#
  1. 1.All the Preliminary Objections are found to have merit
  2. 2.The Plaintiff's Notice of Motion dated 23.6.2023 and the entire suit are dismissed
  3. 3.Costs awarded to the 1st Defendant, 2nd, 4th and 9th Defendants, 3rd and 8th Defendants, and the 6th Defendant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 7
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 6
  • Limitation of Actions ActSection 7
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 159(2)(d)
  • Oaths and Statutory Declarations RulesRule 9
  • Land Acquisition Act1968

Cases cited (18)

  • Robert Mcaharia & others v Kibiro Karanja & others
    High Court Suit No. 1348 of 1972
  • Group 27 Investment Limited v Kiambu Dandora Farmers Company Limited & others
    ELC E161 of 2019
  • Republic v National Land Commission & another; Samuel Wachira Wanja & 2 others (Ex Parte); Kiambu Dandora Farmers Co Ltd & another (Interested Parties)
    [2021] eKLR
  • Diocese of Eldoret Trustee (Registered) v Attorney General (on behalf of the Principal Secretary Treasury) & Anor
    [2020] eKLR
  • Ephraim Miano Thamaini v Nancy Wanjiru Wangai & 2 Others
    [2022] eKLR
  • Kenya Commercial Bank Limited v Benjoh Amalgamated Limited
    [2017] eKLR
  • John Florence Maritime Services Limited & Another v Cabinet Secretary for Transport and Infrastructure & 3 others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Wilis Onditi Odhiambo v Gateway Insurance Co. Ltd
    [2014] eKLR
  • Mary Osundwa v Sugar Company Limited
    [2002] eKLR
  • Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat v The Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission and 6 others
    [2013] eKLR
  • Nguruman Limited v Jan Bonde Nielsen & 2 Others
    [2014] eKLR
  • Mrao Limited v First American Bank of Kenya Ltd & 2 Others
    [2003] KLR
  • Dina Management Limited v County Government of Mombasa & others
    Petition No. 8 (E010) of 2021
  • Joel Kenduiywo v District Criminal Investigation Officer Nandi & 4 Others
    [2019] eKLR
  • Republic v Paul Kihara Kariuki, Attorney General & 2 others Ex parte Law Society of Kenya
    [2020] eKLR
  • Giella v Cassman Brown
    [1973] EA
  • Sal Yut Services Limited v Ramuka Agencies Limited & others
    ELC 104 of 2015
  • Francis Lekolol and 5 others v Kiambu Dandora Housing Scheme Limited
    ELC Case 249 of 2007
Jurisdiction invoked
Not expressly stated; the court exercised its ordinary first-instance civil jurisdiction under the Civil Procedure Act and the Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kiambu Dandora Farmers Co. Ltd v Waindi & 12 others (Environment & Land Case E234 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 1348 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/1348/eng@2024-03-12

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.