Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNotice of Motion dated 21st August 2023· [2024] KEELC 678 (KLR)

International Kenya (II) Limited v Land Registrar Nakuru County (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E014 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 678 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
15 February 2024
1,549 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan bank lost its bid to register auction-bought land because it never got the court's permission before buying the property itself.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The applicant, Credit Bank Limited, moved the court by Notice of Motion dated 21st August 2023 seeking orders compelling the Land Registrar, Nakuru, to register and effect the transfer of land parcel No. Nakuru Municipality/Block 4/306 into its name. The bank deponed that it advanced Rivanas Properties Limited Kshs.31,500,000/= secured by a charge over the suit property; that after default it served the requisite notices, obtained a valuation, and advertised the property for sale. After a failed auction on 10th December 2020 at a reserve price of Kshs.15,000,000/=, the property was re-advertised and on 11th February 2021 the applicant, invoking Section 100(3) of the Land Act, bid and purchased the property at the reserve price. The respondent Registrar, in a replying affidavit sworn by C.A Liayi, stated he could not effect the transfer unless the applicant provided evidence that the sale met the provisions of the law. The respondent filed no submissions. Applying Section 100 of the Land Act and the decision in Ecobank Kenya Limited v First Choice Mega Stores Limited, the court found that a chargee can only purchase charged property being sold in exercise of the power of sale with the leave of the court, and that it was evident the applicant did not seek leave before bidding. The sale of 11th February 2021 was therefore non-compliant with Section 100, and the Registrar could not be compelled to transfer the property until the statutory requirements were met. The application was dismissed.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the chargee's purchase of the suit property at public auction complied with Section 100 of the Land Act

Holding

The sale did not comply with Section 100 because the applicant, a chargee, did not seek the leave of the court before bidding for and purchasing the suit property

Reasoning

Section 100(1) permits a chargee exercising statutory power of sale to purchase the property only with leave of the court, save for the public-auction scenario in subsection (3). Relying on Ecobank Kenya Limited v First Choice Mega Stores Limited, the court held that a chargee can only purchase charged property with leave of court. It was evident the applicant never sought such leave before bidding on 11th February 2021, so the sale was statutorily defective and the Registrar could not be compelled to register the transfer.

p. 4
02

Whether the respondent Registrar could be directed to register the transfer in favour of the applicant

Holding

The Registrar could not be compelled to register until the requirements of Section 100 were met

Reasoning

Under Section 100(4), the Registrar may require a chargee purchasing charged land to provide evidence of compliance with the section before registration. The respondent had stated he could not effect the transfer unless evidence was provided that the sale met the provisions of the law. Since the court found the sale itself non-compliant for want of leave, the application seeking directions to register and execute transfer documents failed.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A chargee may bid for and purchase charged land at a public auction under Section 100(3) of the Land Act, but a chargee purchasing charged property otherwise than under Section 100(3) may only do so with the leave of the court
  • A sale of charged land to the chargee that does not comply with Section 100 of the Land Act cannot found a compulsion on the Registrar to register the transfer

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated 21st August 2023 is dismissed for failure to seek the leave of the court as per Section 100 of the Land Act

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land ActSection 100(1)
  • Land ActSection 100(2)
  • Land ActSection 100(3)
  • Land ActSection 100(4)
  • Land ActSection 97
  • Land ActSection 97(1)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 [1]

Cases cited (3)

  • Palmy Company Limited versus Consolidated Bank of Kenya Limited
    [2014] eKLR
  • Evans Otieno Nyakwana v Cleophas Bwana Ongaro
    [2015] eKLR
  • Ecobank Kenya Limited v First Choice Mega Stores Limited
    [2018] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction over the Notice of Motion; statutory framework of Sections 97 and 100 of the Land Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "International Kenya (II) Limited v Land Registrar Nakuru County (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E014 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 678 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Notice of Motion dated 21st August 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/678/eng@2024-02-15

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.