Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutPetition dated 20/12/2022 (Thika)· [2024] KEELC 594 (KLR)

M/s Thika Bakery Limited v District Land Registrar & others

High Court of Kenya
7 February 2024
1,724 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The High Court struck out Thika Bakery's land dispute petition, ruling that fraud claims must be filed as ordinary civil suits, not constitutional petitions.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
M/s Thika Bakery Limited filed a petition dated 20 December 2022 alleging violations of Articles 27, 35, 40 and 47 of the Constitution and pleading particulars of fraud in the procurement of an allotment letter, deed plan and Grant IR 69027 over land in Thika Municipality. The petitioner sought declarations that it was the bona fide owner and that the title was void ab initio, certiorari to quash the deed plan, mandamus for resurvey and issuance of title, eviction of the 2nd respondent, injunction, damages and costs. Together with the petition it filed a notice of motion dated 20/12/2022 under Section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 40 seeking interlocutory injunctions. The 2nd respondent filed a notice of motion dated 2/3/2023 seeking striking out of the petition on the ground that it was founded on a claim of fraud and raised no constitutional issue. Eboso J held that the dominant issue was the tort of fraud, a private law claim properly ventilated by plaint under the Civil Procedure Act and Rules, following Kennedy Odoyo Okello v District Land Registrar, Migori. The court further noted that the interlocutory injunction application did not lie in a constitutional petition and that the three financial institutions holding charges over the title were not parties. The petition and the application of 20/12/2022 were struck out, with liberty to the petitioner to file a normal suit subject to limitation, and each party bearing their own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a petition premised on allegations of fraud in procurement of an allotment letter, deed plan and grant is a proper constitutional petition

Holding

It is not; the dominant issue is a private law claim of fraud which must be pursued by plaint

Reasoning

The court read the petition and found that the gist of the case was that the allotment letter, deed plan and grant IR 69027 were fraudulently procured, with lengthy particulars of fraud pleaded. Fraud is a tort in private law, ventilated on a plaint and governed by the Civil Procedure Act and Rules. Reliance was placed on Kennedy Odoyo Okello v District Land Registrar, Migori. The court also noted the absence of the three chargees as parties. Accordingly the petition was struck out with liberty to file a normal suit.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • The tort of fraud is a private law claim that must be ventilated by way of a plaint, not through a constitutional petition under Articles 22 and 23
  • Interlocutory injunctions are private law remedies not available in a constitutional petition, which is governed by rule 23 of the Mutunga Rules for conservatory or interim orders
  • A title founded on an allotment letter and deed plan cannot be nullified in proceedings where the chargees of that title are not parties

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The petition is struck out in terms of prayer 1 of the notice of motion dated 2/3/2023
  2. 2.The notice of motion dated 20/12/2022 is struck out
  3. 3.Each party to bear their respective costs of the petition
  4. 4.Subject to the law of limitation, the petitioner is at liberty to ventilate their claim on the platform of a normal suit

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya 2010Articles 22(1), 23, 27, 35, 40, 47
  • Constitution of Kenya [Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms] Practice and Procedure Rules 2013Rules 3, 4(1), 8, 10, 23
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 3A
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 40 rules 1, 2 and 3

Cases cited (1)

  • Kennedy Odoyo Okello v District Land Registrar, Migori & 2 others
    [2015] eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 22(1) and 23 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "M/s Thika Bakery Limited v District Land Registrar & others", Case Analysis (2024). Petition dated 20/12/2022 (Thika). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/594/eng@2024-02-07

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.