Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedNot stated in the judgment as extracted· [2024] KEELC 582 (KLR)

Njuguna v Gitau & another (Environment & Land Case 83 of 2013) [2024] KEELC 582 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
9 February 2024
1,795 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court confirmed that people evicted through a court order do not need extra Land Act notices before removal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a ruling on a Notice of Motion dated November 10, 2023 in which the 2nd Defendant, Joseph Githinji Kariithi, sought warrants of attachment and eviction in favour of Wanderi Auctioneers, together with an order directing the OCS Nakuru Central Police Station to provide security during eviction of the Plaintiff from Nakuru Municipality Block 16/634. The application was founded on a judgment delivered by Justice Munyao Sila on March 6, 2019, which ordered the Plaintiff to give vacant possession within 14 days, failing which eviction would issue. The Plaintiff/Respondent opposed the application through grounds of opposition and submissions, arguing it was premature, incompetent and an abuse of process because (i) a Notice to Show Cause on execution, issued by the Deputy Registrar on September 14, 2021, was still pending; (ii) execution applications belong in the first instance to the Deputy Registrar under Order 22 rules 6 and 18 of the Civil Procedure Rules; and (iii) the mandatory pre-eviction notices under sections 152B and 152E of the Land Act, 2012 had not been served on the Plaintiff, the Deputy County Commissioner or the OCPD. Counsel relied on George Neil Baird v Fredrick Jose Kinpua and Moses Kipkurui Bor v John Chirchir. The court held that the Land Act notice regime applies only where a landowner has not approached the court, and it would be absurd to subject a court decree to that process. It found the respondent was hiding behind procedure to avoid compliance with the 2019 decree, and allowed the application, ordering warrants of eviction and police security for the eviction. Judgment dated and delivered virtually at Nakuru on February 9, 2024 by A.O. Ombwayo, Judge.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether sections 152B, 152E and related provisions of the Land Act apply to eviction pursuant to a court decree

Holding

They do not; those provisions govern evictions initiated by a landowner without recourse to court, and it would be absurd to subject a decree to that process.

Reasoning

The court analysed sections 152E and 152F of the Land Act and found that the statutory notice regime begins with the opinion of the owner or person in charge of the land, followed by a notice and a possible application to court for relief. Where a decree has already been issued by a court, the eviction flows from the decree and the court's process, so subjecting such an eviction to the statutory notice requirements would be absurd.

p. 3
02

Whether the respondent was hiding behind procedure to defeat the decree

Holding

Yes; the respondent was using procedure to avoid compliance with the decree dated 6 March 2019.

Reasoning

The judgment and decree had been in place since March 2019, almost five years. Despite notices to vacate, the plaintiff continued in occupation. The court held that entitlement to the fruits of judgment outweighed procedural objections raised in the grounds of opposition and submissions, and granted the eviction warrants sought.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Eviction in execution of a court decree is not subject to the pre-eviction notice regime of sections 152A to 152F of the Land Act, which applies to extra-judicial evictions by landowners
  • Litigation must come to an end and a decree holder is entitled to enjoy the fruits of judgment

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Warrants of eviction to be issued in favor of Wanderi Auctioneers
  2. 2.The Officer Commanding Station Nakuru Central Police Station to provide security during the eviction of the Plaintiff from parcel Nakuru Municipality Block 16/634

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Act152B
  • Land Act152E
  • Land Act152F
  • Land Act152G
  • Land Act15A, 15B, 15C, 15D, 15E, 15F (as cited in judgment)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 22 rule 6
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 22 Rule 18(1)

Cases cited (2)

  • George Neil Baird & another v Fredrick Jose Kinpua & another
    (2004) eKLR
  • Moses Kipkurui Bor v John Chirchir
    (2019) eKLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Appellate/supervisory jurisdiction over execution applications following decree in ELC suit; decree of Justice Munyao Sila dated 6 March 2019

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Njuguna v Gitau & another (Environment & Land Case 83 of 2013) [2024] KEELC 582 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Not stated in the judgment as extracted. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/582/eng@2024-02-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.