Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedELC Case of 2021 (Kericho), Plaint dated 8th June, 2021· [2024] KEELC 576 (KLR)

Belyon (Suing as the Administrator of the Estate of Kibelion Arap Ngetich) v Kimetto & another (Environment and Land Case Civil Suit E026 of 2021) [2024] KEELC 576 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
8 February 2024
14,574 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~58 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A son who waited nearly 50 years to challenge his father's land transfer lost because Kenyan law gives you only twelve years to sue over land.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiff, son and legal administrator ad litem of the late Kibelion Arap Ngetich, sued the Defendants seeking a declaration that the cancellation of his father's name from the register of parcel Kericho/Kabartegan/4 and the subsequent registration of John Bore (entry No. 4, 19th December 1973) was irregular and void; restoration of his father's name; alternatively, a declaration that the Defendants, registered on 1st August 1996, hold 2.83 hectares in trust for the estate, plus mesne profits and costs. He relied on an award of the Roret Land Dispute Tribunal adopted in Kericho CMCC Misc. Application No. 108 of 2010, under which his father's family was awarded 7 of the 11 acres. The Defendants denied the claim, asserting they purchased the entire parcel from John Bore for Kshs. 1,000,000/= after due diligence, with Land Control Board consent, and had enjoyed quiet possession for over 25 years; they were never parties to the Tribunal proceedings. The Land Registrar (PW4) traced the register from adjudication through the 1973 transfer and the 1996 transfer, all supported by documentation, save that the original title issued to Kibellion was missing from the parcel file. The court held that the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction under Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunals Act to determine title, rendering its award a nullity; that the widows who prosecuted the claim lacked locus standi under Section 82(a) of the Law of Succession Act; and that the Defendants' title was procedurally procured and protected by Section 26(1) of the Land Registration Act. The suit, filed about 47 years after the 1973 registration, was statute barred under Section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act, ousting jurisdiction. The suit was dismissed with costs on 8th February 2024.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of the Roret Land Dispute Tribunal over title to land

Holding

The Tribunal acted ultra vires and in excess of its jurisdiction because the Land Disputes Tribunals Act confined its jurisdiction to boundary disputes, claims to occupy or work land, and trespass - not title

Reasoning

The court examined Section 3(1) of the Land Disputes Tribunals Act No. 18 of 1990 and found the Tribunal's enumerated jurisdiction did not extend to determination of ownership or title to land. The Tribunal had purported to award seven acres of the suit land to the family of the late Kibelion Ngetich, which was a determination on title. Consequently the award and its adoption as a court order were a nullity and could not found the Plaintiff's claim.

p. 21
02

Locus standi of the widows before the Tribunal

Holding

Martha C Ngetich and Mary C Bore lacked locus standi to deal with land registered to their deceased husbands without letters of administration

Reasoning

Section 82(a) of the Law of Succession Act confers power to enforce causes of action surviving the deceased on personal representatives alone. The parties to the Tribunal proceedings were the widows of the two deceased men, neither of whom had obtained a grant of letters of administration. Relying on Trouistik Union International v Jane Mbeyu, the court held they could not competently agitate the dispute, undermining the Tribunal award relied upon by the Plaintiff.

p. 20
03

Whether the Defendants' title was impeachable

Holding

The Defendants' title was protected under Section 26(1) of the Land Registration Act and was procured procedurally

Reasoning

Section 26(1) of the Land Registration Act makes a certificate of title prima facie evidence of absolute and indefeasible ownership, subject to challenge only on fraud or misrepresentation to which the proprietor is party, or illegality. The Land Registrar's evidence (PW4) showed the transfer from Kibelion to John Bore and thereafter to the Defendants was supported by consents, transfer forms, payment of fees and receipts. No fraud was proved against the Defendants.

p. 21
04

Whether the Plaintiff's claim was statute barred

Holding

Yes - the claim to recover land was brought long after the twelve-year limitation period under Section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act, ousting the court's jurisdiction

Reasoning

The cause of action accrued on 19th December 1973 when John Bore was registered, and again on 1st August 1996 when the Defendants were registered. The Plaintiff filed suit on 8th June 2021, roughly 47 years and 25 years respectively after those events. Citing Mukuru Munge and Bosire Ongero v Royal Media Services, the court held limitation goes to jurisdiction, so the court was obliged to down tools and dismiss the suit.

p. 23

Legal principles established

#
  • A claim to recover land must be brought within twelve years from when the right of action accrued, failing which the court has no jurisdiction
  • A decision by a tribunal without jurisdiction is null and void
  • Only personal representatives under Section 82(a) of the Law of Succession Act may agitate causes of action vested in the deceased
  • Without jurisdiction a court must take no further step in the matter

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Plaintiff's suit herein is dismissed with costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land Registration ActSection 80(1)
  • Land Registration ActSection 26(1)
  • Limitation of Actions ActSection 7
  • Limitation of Actions ActSection 4(4)
  • Law of Succession ActSection 82(a)
  • Land Disputes Tribunals Act No. 18 of 1990 (repealed)Section 3(1)
  • Registered Land Act, Cap 300 (repealed)
  • Registration of Land ActSection 83
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 11

Cases cited (19)

  • Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission v Online Enterprises Limited & 4 others
    [2019] eKLR
  • Alice Chemutai Too vs. Nickson Kipkurui Korir & 2 Others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Chemei Investments Limited vs. The Attorney General & Others
    Nairobi Petition No. 94 of 2005
  • Dr. Joseph Arap Ngok v Justice Moijo Ole Keiwua & 5 Others
    Civil Appeal No. Nai. 60 of 1997
  • Katende v Harida Limited
    [2008] 2 E.A. 173
  • M'ikiara M'rinkanya and Another vs. Gilbert Kabeere M'mbijiwe
  • Haron Onyancha vs. National Police Service Commission & Another
    [2017] eKLR
  • Gathoni v Kenya Co-operative Cremires Ltd
    [1982] KLR 104
  • Rawal vs. Rawal
    [1990] KLR 275
  • Bosire Ogero vs. Royal Media Services
    [2015] eKLR
  • Lemita Ole Lemein vs. Attorney General & 2 Others
    [2020] eKLR
  • Njenga Chogera vs. Maria Wanjira Kimani & 2 Others
    [2005] eKLR
  • Peter Ndungu Njenga vs. Sophia Watiri Ndungu
    [2000] eKLR
  • Juletabi African Adventure Limited & another vs. Christopher Michael Lockley
    [2017] eKLR
  • Moses Mbugu vs. Mary Nyambura Ngethe
    [2012] eKLR
  • Trouistik Union International & Another vs. Jane Mbeyu & Another
    (2008) IKLR (G&F) 730
  • Mukuru Munge vs. Florence Shingi Mwawana & 2 others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Bosire Ongero vs Royal Media Services
    [2015] eKLR
  • Owners of the Motor Vessel "Lillian S" v Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd
    [1989] KLR 1
Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution (Environment and Land Court jurisdiction) - the court determined a dispute over title to land; jurisdiction defeated by limitation under Section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Belyon (Suing as the Administrator of the Estate of Kibelion Arap Ngetich) v Kimetto & another (Environment and Land Case Civil Suit E026 of 2021) [2024] KEELC 576 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). ELC Case of 2021 (Kericho), Plaint dated 8th June, 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/576/eng@2024-02-08

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.