Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedELC Case (number not stated in judgment)· [2024] KEELC 573 (KLR)

Mwangi (Suing as the Administrator of the Estate of Paul Mwangi Nderitu) v Nderitu & 2 others (Environment & Land Case E252 of 2020) [2024] KEELC 573 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
6 February 2024
5,497 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~22 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court ruled that land registered in children's names was held in trust for their father's estate, so the widow inherits it.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiff, widow and co-administrator of the Estate of Paul Mwangi Nderito, sued her children seeking declarations that she was the lawful owner of Nairobi/Block 209/9673 and Dagoretti/Riruta S 654, injunctions and general damages, alleging the properties had been registered in the defendants' names to hold in trust for her late husband, who bequeathed them to her by a Will dated 5th August 2008. The 1st and 2nd Defendants counterclaimed, asserting the properties were transferred to them in 2001 as perfected gifts inter vivos and that the deceased lacked the locus to bequeath what he no longer owned. The 3rd Defendant, the registration authority, did not participate. At trial, evidence was adopted by consent in lieu of viva voce testimony. The court first held that the plaintiff's res judicata and functus officio arguments, based on judgment in the succession cause HCSC No. 759 of 2010, could not be entertained because they were raised only in submissions, which are neither pleadings nor evidence. On the merits, applying the trust jurisprudence in Heartbeat, Twalib Hatayan, Juletabi and Kazungu Fondo Shutu, and the indefeasibility provisions of the repealed Registration of Titles Act, Registered Land Act and the Land Registration Act 2012, the court found the defendants never took possession, admitted the properties were to benefit the whole family, and never contested their inclusion in the Estate; it concluded the properties were held in trust, not gifted, and that the plaintiff proved her case on a balance of probabilities. The counterclaim was dismissed, the Estate declared lawful proprietor, and the 3rd Defendant ordered to register the administrators. Each party was to bear their own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the suit properties were held in trust for the deceased or were gifts inter vivos to the defendants

Holding

The properties were not outright gifts but were held in trust for the deceased, who was at liberty to bequeath them to the plaintiff through his Estate

Reasoning

The transfers preceded the Will, yet the deceased included the properties in his Will and they were included in the Estate without objection by the defendants in the succession cause. The defendants never took possession of the family home, admitted correspondence showing the properties were to benefit the whole family, and offered no explanation for their substantial shift in position. The court inferred a trust from the totality of the circumstances and held the plaintiff proved her case on a balance of probabilities.

p. 11
02

Whether the res judicata/functus officio contention, raised only in submissions, could dispose of the suit

Holding

Res judicata is jurisdictional and may be raised at any stage, but submissions are not a proper manner of raising it; the court proceeded to determine the merits

Reasoning

Relying on Ngang'a v Owiti, Moi v Mwangi Stephen Muriithi and Avenue Car Hire, the court held that submissions are not pleadings or evidence and no judgment can be based on them. Since the plaintiff raised res judicata only in submissions and did not withdraw her suit, the jurisdictional objection failed procedurally and the court addressed ownership on the evidence.

p. 6
03

The effect of registration under the repealed Registration of Titles Act, Registered Land Act and the Land Registration Act, 2012

Holding

Registration confers absolute ownership, but registered land is subject to overriding interests including trusts unless the contrary is expressed in the register

Reasoning

The court reviewed sections 23(1) RTA, 27 RLA and sections 24, 25 and 28 LRA 2012, noting that a proprietor's indefeasible title is subject to trusts, which are overriding interests not requiring noting on the register. A trustee is not relieved of fiduciary obligations by registration, so registration of the properties in the children's names did not defeat the deceased's beneficial ownership.

p. 8

Legal principles established

#
  • Res judicata is a jurisdictional issue that may be raised at any stage, but not through submissions; submissions are not pleadings and cannot substitute for evidence or pleadings
  • A trust will not be implied by the court except in cases of absolute necessity; the intention to create a trust must be clearly determined
  • A perfected gift inter vivos divests the donor of ownership; a deceased cannot bequeath property that is no longer theirs

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The 1st and 2nd Defendants' Counterclaim is dismissed
  2. 2.A declaration that the Estate of Paul Mwangi Nderito is the lawful proprietor of parcels of land known as Nairobi/Block 209/9673 and Dagoretti/Riruta S 654
  3. 3.A mandatory injunction directing and requiring the 3rd Defendant to forthwith register the administrators of the Estate of Paul Mwangi Nderito as proprietors of Nairobi/Block 209/9673 and Dagoretti/Riruta S654, and thereafter in accordance with the Confirmed Certificate of Grant
  4. 4.Each party to bear his/her own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Law of Succession ActSection 2(1)
  • Land Registration Act, 2012Sections 24, 25, 26, 28
  • Registration of Titles Act (repealed)Section 23(1)
  • Registered Land Act (repealed)Section 27
  • Evidence Act, CAP 80Sections 107, 109, 112
  • Civil Procedure RulesModes of receiving evidence (as referenced)

Cases cited (12)

  • Kenya Commercial Bank Limited vs Benjoh Amalgamated Limited
    [2017] eKLR
  • Heartbeat Limited vs Ng'ambwa Heartbeat Community Children's Home & Rescue Center
    [2018] eKLR
  • Twalib Hatayan Twalib Hatayan & Another vs Said Saggar Ahmed Al-Heidy & Others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Bristol and West Building Society vs Mothew
    [1998] Ch 1
  • Ngang'a & Another vs Owiti & Another
    [2008] 1 KLR (EP) 749
  • Daniel Toroitich Arap Moi vs Mwangi Stephen Muriithi & Another
    [2014] eKLR
  • Avenue Car Hire & Another vs Slipha Wanjiru Muthegu
    Civil Appeal No. 302 of 1997
  • Muchami Mugeni vs Elizabeth Wanjugu Mungara & Another
    Civil Appeal No. 141 of 1998
  • Kazungu Fondo Shutu & Another vs Japhet Noti Charo & Another
    [2021] eKLR
  • Juletabi African Adventure Limited & Another vs Christopher Michael Lockley
    [2017] eKLR
  • In Re Estate of late Gedion Manthi Nzioka
    2015 eKLR
  • HCSC No. 759 of 2010: In the matter of the Estate of Paul Mwangi Nderito
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction under the Environment and Land Court Act over disputes relating to ownership of land

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mwangi (Suing as the Administrator of the Estate of Paul Mwangi Nderitu) v Nderitu & 2 others (Environment & Land Case E252 of 2020) [2024] KEELC 573 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). ELC Case (number not stated in judgment). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/573/eng@2024-02-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.