Mitaboni Katani Company Limited v Muinde & 5 others (Environment & Land Case 126 of 2019) [2024] KEELC 509 (KLR)
The bottom line
#Kenya's Environment and Land Court struck out a land dispute lawsuit because it was re-litigating a claim already decided and upheld on appeal.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether the suit is res judicata in respect of Machakos ELC No. 112 of 2009 (Peter Mutua Muinde & Dominic Musei Ikombo v Geoffrey Kithuka Mwangangi & Hellena Cheserem) and Nairobi Civil Appeal No. 58 of 2019
The suit is res judicata; the fulcrum of the dispute, the parties and the title are the same as in the previous suit, which was heard and determined on merit and upheld on appeal
Applying Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act and the five-element test in John Florence Maritime Services (identity of matter in issue, parties, title, jurisdiction and finality), the court found that the plaintiff had simply clothed the same claim in fresh apparel. The previous suit concerned the same land, Mavoko Town Block 2/199, was heard and determined on merit, and the appeal was dismissed on 7th August 2020.
Whether the Plaint should be struck out under Order 2 Rule 15 of the Civil Procedure Rules
The Plaint does not disclose a reasonable cause of action, is scandalous, frivolous and vexatious and amounts to an abuse of the court process, and is therefore struck out
Guided by D.T. Dobie v Muchina and Ramji Megji Gudka on the sparing exercise of the striking-out power, the court found the claim re-litigated a matter already determined up to the Court of Appeal, rendering the Plaint an abuse of process that ought to be struck out with costs.
Legal principles established
#- A suit whose subject matter, parties and title are the same as a previously heard and determined suit is res judicata and constitutes an abuse of the court process; litigation must come to an end
- The power to strike out pleadings must be exercised sparingly and only in the clearest of cases, without embarking on the merits
Court orders
#- 1.The Notice of Motion Application dated 30th November 2022 is allowed
- 2.The Plaint dated 18th November 2019 is struck out
- 3.The suit is dismissed with costs to the Defendants
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Article 162(b) of the Constitution and Section 13(2) of the Environment and Land Court Act (jurisdiction contested in the application); striking-out jurisdiction under Order 2 Rule 15 and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Mitaboni Katani Company Limited v Muinde & 5 others (Environment & Land Case 126 of 2019) [2024] KEELC 509 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). ELC Case of 2019 (Plaint dated 18th November 2019), Machakos. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/509/eng@2024-02-07
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.