Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedVoi MELC No. E015 of 2021 (application dated 5th October 2023)· [2024] KEELC 396 (KLR)

Mwandaa (Suing as the Legal Representative& Administrator of the Estate of Irene Samba Mwandaa) v Kizidio (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E002 of 2023) (Environment and Land) [2024] KEELC 396 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
24 January 2024
5,818 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~23 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan land court refused a late appeal because choosing to seek a review of the judgment means giving up your right to appeal that same decision.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Voi (Naikuni, J) on a Notice of Motion dated 5th October 2023 by Doricah Mwake Mwandaa, the intended appellant and legal representative of the estate of Irene Samba Mwandaa. She sought leave to appeal out of time against the judgment of Hon. A.M. Obura (Mrs)-CM in Voi MELC No. E015 of 2021 delivered on 11th May 2023, which dismissed her suit and partially allowed the respondent's counter-claim, and sought to have her draft memorandum of appeal deemed filed. She explained the delay by her pursuit of a review of the judgment (dismissed on 28th August 2023) and by the need to source funds for legal representation. The respondent opposed, arguing that by electing review under Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act the applicant relinquished her right of appeal, and that the delay was unexplained. The court framed three issues: merit, entitlement to relief, and costs. It held that review and appeal are mutually exclusive remedies; the moment the applicant submitted to review she relinquished her right of appeal, and the fact that the review was only for clarification was immaterial. Applying Sections 79G and 95 CPA and the Thuita Mwangi criteria, the court found the five-month delay (44 days after the review ruling) inordinate, unjustified and an afterthought, and the draft appeal not arguable, such that granting leave would prejudice the respondent's enjoyment of the judgment. The application was dismissed with costs to the respondent under Section 27 CPA. Authority cited by counsel was largely party-cited; Serephen Nyasani Menge was followed and several authorities were applied by the court.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a party who sought review of a judgment can thereafter prefer an appeal against the same decree

Holding

No. By submitting herself to review, the applicant relinquished her right of appeal; review and appeal cannot co-exist.

Reasoning

The court relied on Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 45 Rules 1 and 2, which restrict review to decrees from which no appeal has been preferred, and endorsed Serephen Nyasani Menge holding that a party cannot apply for review and appeal from the same decree or order. Whether the review was merely for clarification was immaterial.

p. 9
02

Whether the delay of over five months from judgment (44 days from the review ruling) was sufficiently explained to warrant extension of time

Holding

No. The explanation of awaiting the review ruling and sourcing funds was unreasonable, inordinate and an afterthought.

Reasoning

Applying Section 79G and Section 95 of the Civil Procedure Act and the Thuita Mwangi and County Executive of Kisumu criteria, the court found the delay unexplained to its satisfaction and the draft memorandum of appeal not arguable, so extension would prejudice the respondent's enjoyment of the judgment.

p. 10
03

Who should bear the costs of the application

Holding

The Intended Respondent, as costs follow the event under Section 27 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Reasoning

The application failed, so the successful party was entitled to costs. The court applied the principle that costs follow the event and are compensatory of the successful party, citing Section 27 CPA and the Ihururu Dairy Farmers decision.

p. 11

Legal principles established

#
  • A party who elects to seek review of a decree relinquishes the right to appeal against the same decree; review and appeal are mutually exclusive
  • Extension of time to file an appeal out of time is discretionary and governed by the Thuita Mwangi factors

Court orders

#
  1. 1.That the Notice of Motion application dated 5th October, 2023 be and is hereby found to be unmeritorious and hence disallowed with costs
  2. 2.That the costs of the application to be awarded to the Intended Respondent

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1A, 1B, 3A, 27, 75, 79G, 80, 95
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 45 Rules 1 and 2; Order 50 Rule 6; Orders 40 and 42
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010generally

Cases cited (13)

  • Kisya Investments Limited v Attorney General and Another
    Civil Appeal No. 31 of 1995
  • Rufus Murithi Nyaga v Juliet Wanja Ireri
    [2018] eKLR
  • Nicholas Kiptoo Korir Salat v The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 7 Others
    [2014] eKLR
  • Serephen Nyasani Menge v Rispah Onsase
    [2018] eKLR
  • Republic v Rosemary Wairimu Munene, Ex-Parte Applicant v Ihururu Dairy Farmers Co-operative Society Ltd
    Judicial Review application no 6 of 2014
  • Haraf Traders Limited v Narok County Government
    [2022] eKLR
  • Republic v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board & 2 others
    [2018] eKLR
  • Sese (Suing as the Administrator of the Estate of the Late Shali Sese) v Karezi & 8 others
    (Environment and Land Constitutional Petition 32 of 2020) [2023] KEELC 17427 (KLR)
  • Ajit Kumar Rath v State of Orisa
    9 Supreme Court Cases 596 at Page 608
  • Nyamongo & Nyamongo v Kogo
    [2001] EA 170
  • Thuita Mwangi v Kenya Airways Limited
    [2003] eKLR
  • County Executive of Kisumu v County of Kisumu and 8 Others
    Civil Application No. 3 of 2016
  • United Insurance Company of Kenya Limited v Ramzan Abdul Dhanji
    Civil Application No. 179 of 1998
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 1A, 1B, 3A, 75 and 95 of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21 and Order 50 Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mwandaa (Suing as the Legal Representative& Administrator of the Estate of Irene Samba Mwandaa) v Kizidio (Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E002 of 2023)  (Environment and Land) [2024] KEELC 396 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Voi MELC No. E015 of 2021 (application dated 5th October 2023). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/396/eng@2024-01-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.