Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedPetitioners' Notice of Motion dated 2nd May 2023 (within a Constitutional Petition re ELC 100 of 2019 and ELC 227 of 2019)· [2024] KEELC 256 (KLR)

Musembi & 2 others v Chief Magistrate Court, Milimani Law Courts & 12 others; Owino & 5 others (Interested Parties) (Environment & Land Petition E019 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 256 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
25 January 2024
6,382 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~26 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court stopped criminal prosecutions over a land sale, ruling that police and prosecutors must act in good faith, not to gain advantage in civil disputes.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The 1st to 3rd Petitioners moved the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi by Notice of Motion dated 2nd May 2023 seeking conservatory orders staying two Milimani criminal cases (E1264 of 2021 and E289 of 2023) and a temporary injunction restraining the Respondents from arresting, investigating or prosecuting them in connection with the transaction over L.R. 1870/II/200 IR No. 65800, pending determination of their Petition. The Petitioners asserted that the 1st Petitioner had lawfully purchased the suit property from Horizon Hills Limited for Kshs 220,000,000, that competing civil suits over ownership (ELC 100 of 2019 and ELC 227 of 2019) were pending, and that the DCI and DPP had, in a turnabout from 2021 investigation reports that recommended prosecuting others, selectively directed the Petitioners' prosecution to assist opposing parties in the civil suits, breaching their rights to property, fair hearing and fair administrative action. The 11th Respondent and the DCI opposed, relying on Section 193A of the Criminal Procedure Code allowing concurrent proceedings and asserting probable cause. Angote J applied the four principles from Board of Management of Uhuru Secondary School, held that concurrent proceedings are lawful only where pursued in good faith, found the arrest and charge prima facie irrational and procedurally improper, and concluded the Petitioners had established a prima facie case and that the Petition would be rendered nugatory absent the orders. The application was allowed: a conservatory stay of the two criminal cases and a temporary injunction against further investigation or prosecution were issued, with costs in the course.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Petitioners established a prima facie case with a likelihood of success for conservatory orders

Holding

They did - the turnabout in the DCI's recommendations and the DPP's selective direction to charge rendered the arrest and charge prima facie irrational and procedurally improper

Reasoning

The court compared the 2021 DCI reports recommending prosecution of the 11th Respondent and others with the DPP's 4th April 2023 letter directing the Petitioners to be charged. The Respondents gave no reasons for disregarding the 2021 evidence, and their evidence appeared scant and selective. This satisfied the first criterion from Board of Management of Uhuru Secondary School, and the court found the Petitioners' rights to fair hearing and property would be infringed absent the orders.

p. 12
02

Whether the pendency of civil proceedings bars criminal prosecution under Section 193A of the Criminal Procedure Code

Holding

Concurrent proceedings are permitted, but courts may intervene where investigation or prosecution is unreasonable, made in bad faith, or intended to achieve an ulterior motive

Reasoning

The court accepted that Section 193A allows concurrent civil and criminal proceedings, but relied on Commissioner of Police v Kenya Commercial Bank, Lalchand Fulchand Shah and Rosemary Wanja Mwagiru to hold that the power to investigate and prosecute must be exercised in good faith and for the genuine enforcement of law, failing which the court will stop the proceedings.

p. 10
03

Whether the Petition would be rendered nugatory if conservatory orders are not granted

Holding

Yes - the Petitioners would suffer prejudice and the Petition would be rendered nugatory

Reasoning

Applying the third and fourth principles in Board of Management of Uhuru Secondary School, the court found that without a stay of the criminal cases and an injunction against further investigations, the Petitioners would suffer prejudice and the Petition's substratum would be defeated, and that stopping the prosecution served the public interest.

p. 13

Legal principles established

#
  • Section 193A of the Criminal Procedure Code permits concurrent criminal and civil proceedings arising from the same issues, but the police power to investigate must be exercised responsibly, lawfully and in good faith
  • A court should stop criminal proceedings instituted for a purpose other than genuine enforcement of law and order
  • Both civil and criminal jurisdictions can run parallel to each other unless either is being employed to perpetuate ulterior motives or abuse the process of the court

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A conservatory order staying the proceedings in Milimani Chief Magistrate Criminal Case No. E1264 of 2021 - Republic v Cissy Kalunde Musembi and Milimani Chief Magistrate Criminal Case No. E289 of 2023 - Republic v David Njenga Samson Kuria & 9 others, or the arresting and charging of the Petitioners by the Respondents in relation to property L.R. 1870/II/200, pending and until hearing and determination of this Petition
  2. 2.A temporary injunction restraining the Respondents from reopening or purporting to reopen, bringing, investigating, instituting or prosecuting any criminal proceedings against the Petitioners in connection with the transaction of Land Reference Number 1870/II/200 IR No. 65800 pending hearing and determination of this Petition
  3. 3.Costs of the application to be in the course

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Penal CodeSections 91, 129(b), 317, 320, 345, 353
  • Criminal Procedure CodeSection 193A
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Articles 40, 47, 50, 157(11)

Cases cited (18)

  • Board of Management of Uhuru Secondary School vs City County Director of Education & 2 Others
    [2015] eKLR
  • Gatirau Peter Munya vs Dickson Mwenda Kithinji & 2 others
    [2014] eKLR
  • Centre for Rights Education and Awareness (CREAW) & 7 Others vs Attorney General
    [2011] eKLR
  • Lalchand Fulchand Shah vs Investments & Mortgages Bank Limited & 5 Others
    [2018] eKLR
  • Henry Aming’a Nyabere vs Director of Public Prosecutions & 2 Others; Sarah Joselyn & Another (Interested Parties)
    [2021] eKLR
  • Stanley Kangethe Kinyanjui vs Tony Ketter & 5 Others
  • Alfred N. Mutua vs Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) & 4 Others
    [2016] eKLR
  • Michael Osundwa Sakwa vs Chief Justice and President of the Supreme Court of Kenya & Another
    [2016] eKLR
  • Invesco Assurance Co. Ltd vs MW (Minor suing thro' next friend and mother (HW)
    [2016] eKLR
  • Judicial Service Commission vs Speaker of the National Assembly & Another
    [2013] eKLR
  • Commissioner of Police & The Director of Criminal Investigation Department & Another vs Kenya Commercial Bank Limited & 4 Others
    [2013] eKLR
  • Alfred Lumiti Lusiba vs Pethad Ranik Shantilal & 2 Others
    [2016] eKLR
  • State of Maharashtra & Others vs Arun Gulab & Others
    Criminal Appeal No. 590 of 2007
  • Rosemary Wanja Mwagiru & 2 Others vs Attorney General & 2 Others
  • Chris Ochieng & 3 Others vs Director of Public Prosecutions & another; Jude Anyiko (Interested party)
    [2021] eKLR
  • Githunguri v Republic
    [1985] LLR 3090
  • Ndarua V. R.
    [2002] 1EA 205
  • Kuria & 3 Others V. Attorney General
    [2002] 2KLR
Jurisdiction invoked
Constitution of Kenya, 2010 - Bill of Rights enforcement jurisdiction (Articles 40, 47, 50 invoked; Article 157(11) referenced in cited authority)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Musembi & 2 others v Chief Magistrate Court, Milimani Law Courts & 12 others; Owino & 5 others (Interested Parties) (Environment & Land Petition E019 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 256 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Petitioners' Notice of Motion dated 2nd May 2023 (within a Constitutional Petition re ELC 100 of 2019 and ELC 227 of 2019). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/256/eng@2024-01-25

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.