Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNairobi HCCC No 489 of 2015 (filed in Machakos ELC)· [2024] KEELC 152 (KLR)

Tamarind Meadows Ltd & others v Wibeso Investments Ltd

Environment and Land Court
24 January 2024
2,914 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that waiting seven years to ask for arbitration means you have lost the right to it.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a notice of motion dated 27th January 2023 by the defendants in an Environment and Land Court suit seeking a stay of proceedings and reference of the dispute to arbitration under Clause 21 of the sale agreement dated 16th April 2010, or alternatively the striking out and/or stay of the suit pending determination of Court of Appeal Nairobi Civil Appeal No E356 of 2020 (Tamarind Meadows Ltd v Wibeso Investments & others), on grounds of res judicata and sub judice. The plaintiff opposed, arguing that the application came some 8 years after the suit was filed, long after the defendants had filed defence, that privity of contract excluded the 1st and 3rd defendants from the arbitration clause, and that the issues in this suit - breach of agreement, estate management, service charges and refund of Kshs 7,700,000/- plus interest - were different from those in the other proceedings. The court framed two issues: whether its jurisdiction was ousted by Section 6 of the Arbitration Act, and whether the suit was sub judice or res judicata. Holding that a stay application must be made upon entering appearance, the court found the defendants guilty of inordinate unexplained delay of over 7 years after filing defence, amounting to waiver of the right to arbitrate. On res judicata and sub judice, the court found the parties and issues in this suit differ from those in the appeal and Machakos ELC No 226 of 2017. The motion was dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the court's jurisdiction was ousted by Section 6 of the Arbitration Act

Holding

No; the defendants waived their right to refer the dispute to arbitration by inordinate unexplained delay of over 7 years after filing defence

Reasoning

Section 6(1) requires an application for stay and reference to arbitration to be made not later than the time of entering appearance or otherwise acknowledging the claim. Clause 21 of the sale agreement contained an arbitration clause, but the suit was filed on 4th June 2015, the defence was filed on 5th January 2016, and the application was only lodged in January 2023 - about 7 years after acknowledging the dispute. No explanation for the delay was tendered, so the court found laches and waiver and declined to stay the proceedings.

p. 4
02

Whether the suit is sub judice or res judicata vis-à-vis Civil Appeal No E356 of 2020 and Machakos ELC No 226 of 2017

Holding

No; the parties and the issues in this suit differ from those in the other proceedings

Reasoning

Sections 6 and 7 of the Civil Procedure Act bar trial of suits where the same matter is substantially in issue in a pending or previously decided suit between the same parties litigating under the same title. The plaintiff in this suit is not a party to the appeal; the substantive issue in Machakos ELC No 226 of 2017 was ownership of the suit property, whereas this suit concerns breach of the sale agreement and refund of Kshs 7,700,000/- plus interest, management of the estate and service charges. The claims are therefore neither the same in parties nor in issues.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • Under Section 6(1) of the Arbitration Act, an application to stay proceedings and refer a dispute to arbitration must be made not later than the time the party enters appearance or otherwise acknowledges the claim; a party who delays is deemed to have waived the right to arbitrate
  • Res judicata and sub judice apply only where the parties and the issues in the two suits are substantially the same

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The notice of motion dated 27th January 2023 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application awarded to the plaintiff
Jurisdiction invoked
Articles 159 and 162(2)(b) of the Constitution read with the Environment and Land Court Act; notice of motion under Section 6 of the Arbitration Act and Sections 6 and 7 of the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Tamarind Meadows Ltd & others v Wibeso Investments Ltd", Case Analysis (2024). Nairobi HCCC No 489 of 2015 (filed in Machakos ELC). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/152/eng@2024-01-24

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.