Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedEldoret ELC (case number not stated in judgment)· [2024] KEELC 113 (KLR)

Cheruiyot v Chemweno & 3 others (Environment & Land Case 649 of 2012) [2024] KEELC 113 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
25 January 2024
660 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~3 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenyan courts will not pause execution of costs orders unless you prove real loss—and a dismissed suit cannot itself be stayed.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by the Environment and Land Court at Eldoret (E. O. Obaga, J) determines a Notice of Motion dated 25 September 2023 by the Judgment Debtor/Applicant seeking a stay of all execution proceedings arising from the judgment delivered on 27 October 2022, in which the Applicant's suit was dismissed with costs and the 4th Decree Holder's counter-claim was allowed. Costs were taxed at Kshs 4,208,758/= and execution set in motion. The Applicant, who has filed Eldoret Civil Appeal No. E051 of 2022, argued that without a stay his appeal would be rendered nugatory. The 1st, 3rd and 4th Defendant/Respondents opposed, contending the application was filed one year after judgment and five months after taxation, was designed to scuttle a notice to show cause, and that no substantial loss was demonstrated. The court framed a single issue: whether the Applicant demonstrated grounds warranting stay of execution. Applying Kenya Shell Limited v Karuga, the court held that the dismissal of the Applicant's suit was a negative order incapable of being stayed, that execution on taxed costs would not render the appeal nugatory since costs are refundable upon success, and that the Applicant bore the unshifted burden of proving the Respondents' inability to refund, which the 4th Respondent rebutted with evidence of his income. The application was dismissed with costs to the Respondents on 25 January 2024.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether stay of execution should issue pending appeal

Holding

Stay refused because the order sought to be stayed is negative (dismissal with costs) and no substantial loss was shown

Reasoning

The court held that a dismissal with costs is a negative order incapable of being stayed. Execution is only on costs, which the Applicant would recover on success in the appeal. The Applicant did not demonstrate that the Decree Holders would be unable to refund the taxed costs of Kshs 4,208,758/=; the burden of proving inability to refund remained on the Applicant, and the 4th Respondent deponed to means (medical practice and rental income) sufficient to refund.

p. 2
02

Burden of proving inability to refund costs

Holding

The burden lies on the Applicant and does not shift to the Respondents

Reasoning

The court found that the Applicant nowhere alleged that the Respondents would be incapable of refunding the costs if the appeal succeeded. The burden of proving incapacity to refund did not shift to the Respondents. The 4th Respondent, found to be the lawful owner of the suit property, deponed that he is a medical doctor earning rental income from apartments on the suit property and is capable of refunding the costs.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • Substantial loss is the cornerstone for granting stay of execution; without evidence of substantial loss an appeal is rarely rendered nugatory

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Application dismissed with costs to the Respondents

Authorities

#

Cases cited (1)

  • Kenya Shell Limited –s- Karuga
    1982 – 88 KAR
On appeal from
Court of Appeal, Eldoret
Civil Appeal No. E051 of 2022
Jurisdiction invoked
Inherent jurisdiction to stay execution pending appeal (orders sought under the court's stay jurisdiction; no specific provision quoted)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Cheruiyot v Chemweno & 3 others (Environment & Land Case 649 of 2012) [2024] KEELC 113 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2024). Eldoret ELC (case number not stated in judgment). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2024/113/eng@2024-01-25

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.