Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedEnvironment & Land Case 317 & 320 of 2018 (Consolidated)· [2023] KEELC 21839 (KLR)

Mavani & 4 others (Sued as Officials and Residents of the Dik Dik Residents Association) v Sultan Palace Development Limited & 9 others; National Environment Management Authority & 2 others (Interested Parties)

Environment and Land Court
30 November 2023
1,619 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~6 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court paused a land dispute because the same core issue was already before the Court of Appeal, and warned parties against filing multiple overlapping cases.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by Mogeni J of the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi determines a Notice of Motion dated 23/02/2023 by Sultan Palace Development Limited, the 1st defendant in consolidated ELC Cases 317 and 320 of 2018, seeking a stay of proceedings pending the hearing and determination of Nairobi Civil Appeal No. E392 of 2022. The appeal arises from a ruling of 2/03/2022 in ELC Petition E017 of 2021, in which the court declined conservatory orders, paving the way for WARMA to gazette, demarcate and fence off the suit properties, LR 209/11609/2-6 and LR 209/11609/9-17, alleged to sit on riparian reserves or wetlands. The applicant annexed a stay order issued by the Court of Appeal on 26/07/2022 staying any development or processes on the suit premises. The application was unopposed. Framing two issues - whether a reasonable case for stay was made and costs - the court held that the consolidated suit involves the same parties, the same suit property and the same central issue (whether the properties are wetlands) as the petition under appeal, so continuing the hearing would contravene Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act, which bars parallel proceedings. Applying the stringent test from Kenya Wildlife Service v James Mutembei, the court granted a stay of proceedings pending the appeal, ordered costs in the cause despite the applicant's success, and gave liberty to apply once the appeal is determined. The judge censured the parties and their lawyers for forum shopping and filing a plethora of suits, which delayed efficient resolution of the dispute.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether to stay proceedings pending determination of an appeal in a related petition

Holding

Stay granted; the central issue (whether the suit properties are wetlands) is before the Court of Appeal in Nairobi Civil Appeal No. E392 of 2022, and continuing the suit would breach Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act

Reasoning

The applicant had appealed the ruling in ELC Petition E017 of 2021 and obtained a stay order from the Court of Appeal on 26/07/2022. The consolidated suit involves the same parties, same suit property and the same central issue of whether the properties constitute wetlands. Proceeding would contravene Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act barring parallel litigation over the same matter between the same parties.

p. 3
02

Costs of the application

Holding

Costs in the cause despite the applicant's success

Reasoning

Although the successful applicant would ordinarily be entitled to costs under Section 27 of the Civil Procedure Act, the court exercised its discretion to order costs in the cause, presumably because of the court's displeasure at the multiplicity of suits and forum shopping by the parties.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Where the same parties, same suit property and same central issue are pending before the Court of Appeal, continuing parallel proceedings contravenes Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act and justifies a stay
  • The test for stay of proceedings is high and stringent because it interferes with a litigant's right of access to justice and fair trial

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Stay of proceedings in ELC Case No. 317 of 2018 pending the hearing and determination of Nairobi Civil Appeal No. E392 of 2022
  2. 2.Costs of the application to be in the cause
  3. 3.Any party is at liberty to apply once the appeal is heard and determined

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 6
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 27

Cases cited (1)

  • Kenya Wildlife Service versus James Mutembei
    [2019] eKLR

    Stay of proceedings is a grave judicial action; the test for stay is high and stringent

Jurisdiction invoked
Environment and Land Court original jurisdiction; Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21) invoked as the basis for stay

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mavani & 4 others (Sued as Officials and Residents of the Dik Dik Residents Association) v Sultan Palace Development Limited & 9 others; National Environment Management Authority & 2 others (Interested Parties)", Case Analysis (2023). Environment & Land Case 317 & 320 of 2018 (Consolidated). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/21839/eng@2023-11-30

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.