Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedEnvironment & Land Case 376 of 2017· [2023] KEELC 21713 (KLR)

Thuo (Suing on behalf of The Estate of the Late Teresia Wambui Chege) v Theuri & another

Environment and Land Court
6 November 2023
4,639 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~19 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court cancelled land titles fraudulently transferred from a deceased woman's name, returning the property to her estate and awarding damages.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiff, administrator of the estate of Teresia Wambui Chege, challenged two registrations of 8/11/2013 transferring Ruiru/Mugutha Block 1/T5339 and T5340 from the deceased (who died on 13/8/2013) to the 1st defendant. She sought cancellation of the registrations, declarations that the titles were fraudulently procured, a permanent injunction, general damages for trespass and costs. The 1st defendant asserted a sale agreement dated 2/3/2007 at Kshs 110,000, allegedly signed on the sick deceased's behalf by her children, with Land Control Board consents obtained. The court framed four issues. On the first, it found no sale contract existed: the deceased was not a party to and did not sign the agreement, no power of attorney was proved, and the formalities of Section 3(3) of the Law of Contract Act were unmet. On the second, it held the registrations were fraudulent and illegal: no succession had been initiated when the transfers were registered, no conveyance documents were produced, and the parcel files and registers (showing lost titles and subsisting restrictions) breached Section 44 of the Land Registration Act and the Law of Succession Act. The estate was held entitled to prayers (a), (b), (c), (d) and (f). General damages for trespass were not awarded for want of evidence on quantum; nominal damages of Kshs 2,000,000 were granted instead. The 1st defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs; no costs were awarded to the Chief Land Registrar.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the deceased sold the suit properties to the 1st defendant

Holding

No sale contract existed; the deceased was not a party to and did not execute the sale agreement, and the Section 3(3) Law of Contract Act formalities were not met.

Reasoning

The sale agreement dated 2/3/2007 named Joseph Macharia Chege and Pauline Wanjiku Chege as sellers; the deceased neither signed it nor granted any power of attorney. The 1st defendant led no evidence from the alleged signatories and could not recall the purchase price. Under Section 107 of the Evidence Act he failed to prove the sale.

p. 6
02

Whether the impugned registrations were procured fraudulently and/or illegally

Holding

The registrations of 8/11/2013 were both fraudulent and illegal.

Reasoning

The deceased died on 13/8/2013 and no succession had been initiated when the transfers were registered three months later, contravening the Law of Succession Act. No conveyance documents were produced; the parcel files lacked transfer forms, original titles, LCB consents and identification documents; the registers showed lost titles and restrictions with no entries for re-issuance or removal, in breach of Section 44 of the Land Registration Act.

p. 7
03

Whether the estate is entitled to the reliefs sought

Holding

The estate proved its case and was entitled to prayers (a), (b), (c), (d) and (f); general damages for trespass were substituted with nominal damages of Kshs 2,000,000 for want of evidence on quantum.

Reasoning

The plaintiff proved the case to the required standard, entitling the estate to cancellation, declaration, and permanent injunction. The 1st defendant was a trespasser, but since no evidence supported the claimed Kshs 20,000,000 quantum, the court awarded nominal damages of Kshs 1,000,000 per parcel.

p. 8

Legal principles established

#
  • A contract for the disposition of an interest in land must comply with Section 3(3) of the Law of Contract Act: it must be in writing, signed by all parties, and the signatures attested by a witness present at the time of signing.
  • A person seeking to procure transfer of land from a deceased proprietor must first initiate succession proceedings and obtain an appropriate grant under the Law of Succession Act; transfers effected otherwise are illegal.
  • Instruments effecting dispositions of land must be executed in accordance with Section 44 of the Land Registration Act; registrations done in violation of those mandatory requirements are both fraudulent and illegal.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Cancellation of the registration of Francis Wakahiu Theuri as proprietor of Ruiru/Mugutha Block 1/T5339 and Ruiru/Mugutha Block 1/T5340
  2. 2.The two parcels to vest in the name of Teresia Wambui Chege, the registered proprietor prior to the impugned registrations
  3. 3.Declaration that the titles held by Francis Wakahiu Theuri were procured fraudulently and their cancellation and annulment forthwith
  4. 4.Permanent injunction restraining Francis Wakahiu Theuri, his servants, agents or persons claiming through him from interfering with the estate's quiet and peaceable possession of the two parcels
  5. 5.Nominal damages of Kshs 2,000,000 for trespass on the two parcels, with interest from the date of judgment
  6. 6.The 1st defendant to bear the plaintiff's costs of the suit
  7. 7.No award of costs to the 2nd defendant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Evidence ActSection 107
  • Law of Contract ActSection 3(3)
  • Law of Succession Actgeneral
  • Land Registration ActSection 44
  • Land Registration ActSection 80
  • Registered Land Act (repealed)general

Cases cited (8)

  • Zacharia Wambugu Gathimu & Another v John Ndungu Maina
    [2019] eKLR

    Transfers of a deceased's property without complying with the Law of Succession Act are illegal

  • Wambui v Mwangi & 3 others
    Civil Appeal 465 of 2019 [2021] KECA 144 (KLR)

    Cancellation of titles obtained by fraud under Section 80 of the Land Registration Act

  • Chemey Investments Limited v Attorney General & 2 others
    [2018] eKLR

    Cancellation of fraudulently obtained titles

  • Municipal Council of Eldoret v Titus Gatitu Njau
    [2020] eKLR

    General damages for trespass

  • Samuel Odhiambo Oludhe & 2 others v Jubilee Jumbo Hardware Limited & Another
    [2018] eKLR

    Damages for trespass

  • Ajit Bhogal v Kenya Power and Lighting Co. Ltd
    [2020] eKLR

    Damages for trespass

  • Kuria Kiarie & 2 others v Sammy Magera
    [2018] eKLR

    Cited by the 1st defendant on regularity of title acquisition

  • Eviline Karigu v M'Chabari Kinoro
    [2022] eKLR

    Cited by the 1st defendant on regularity of title acquisition

Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court under Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution over disputes relating to land

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Thuo (Suing on behalf of The Estate of the Late Teresia Wambui Chege) v Theuri & another", Case Analysis (2023). Environment & Land Case 376 of 2017. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/21713/eng@2023-11-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.