Masakha v Family Bank of Kenya & 2 others
The bottom line
#A Kenyan court blocked Family Bank from auctioning a Mombasa property because the bank sent statutory notices to the wrong address.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Jurisdiction of the ELC over disputes on charges and statutory power of sale
The Court has jurisdiction over issues of title, use and occupation of land including validity of statutory notices and auctioneer's notices, but not over pure accounting issues relating to the loan facility
Relying on Article 162(2)(b), Section 13 of the ELC Act, Sections 150 of the Land Act and 101 of the Land Registration Act, the Court held that challenges to the title being used as collateral and to the statutory and auctioneer's notices fall within the ELC. However, accounting disputes over the loan facility belong elsewhere, and the matrimonial property division aspect is severable.
Service of statutory notices to a wrong address
The statutory notices and notification of sale sent to a wrong postal address were a nullity; the chargee failed to prove posting and receipt
The Plaintiff's address in the offer letter (P.O. Box 92233) differed from the address used in the charge (93232) and his claimed address (93231). Citing Nyagilo Ochieng and Martha Khayanga Simiyu, the Court held that once non-receipt is alleged, the chargee must prove posting; a file copy is not proof of posting, and notices to a wrong address are no notice at all.
Entitlement to discharge of the charge and damages
Prayers for discharge of the charge and general/aggravated damages were refused; the guarantor did not prove entitlement
The Court noted the charge contained a continuing security clause and that discharge required a formal request under Clause 40 which was never made. As guarantor of a defaulted loan, the Plaintiff failed to prove entitlement to general or aggravated damages, which are not automatic.
Legal principles established
#- Once a chargor/guarantor alleges non-receipt of statutory notices, the burden shifts to the chargee to prove that the notices were sent; notices sent to a wrong address are a nullity
- Service of an adequate statutory notice and notification of sale are conditions precedent to the valid exercise of statutory power of sale
Court orders
#- 1.Judgment entered partially in favour of the Plaintiff against the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Defendants strictly with regard to prayers numbers 1 and 5 of the Plaint dated 22nd November, 2019
- 2.A declaration that land title no. Mombasa/Municipality/Block/2/5 being matrimonial property is subject to the provisions of Sections 28(a) and 93(1), (2), (3) and (4) of the Land Registration Act, 2012
- 3.A declaration that the statutory notices and advertisement for sale issued by the 2nd Defendant in respect of Title No. Mombasa/Municipality/Block/2/5 on the instructions of the 1st Defendant are null and void
- 4.Each party to bear its own costs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act, No. 19 of 2011
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Masakha v Family Bank of Kenya & 2 others", Case Analysis (2023). Environment & Land Case 209 of 2019. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/21587/eng@2023-11-06
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.