Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedEnvironment and Land Appeal E003 of 2021· [2023] KEELC 21362 (KLR)

Omar & another v Sambul

Environment and Land Court
9 November 2023
2,880 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court dismissed a Kajiado land appeal, confirming eviction because the appellants never asked for a stay when a related suit was pending.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Appellants, defendants in Kajiado CMCC ELC No. 206 of 2017, appealed against a judgment of Hon. Kahuya (CM) dated 9 December 2020 that ordered their eviction from and a permanent injunction in respect of Plot No. 211 Residential Kajiado Town in favour of the Respondent. The Appellants claimed ownership of a distinct Plot 212 allotted to the 2nd Appellant in 2003, alleged collusion between the Respondent and County Government officials in validating the Respondent's plot, contended that an allotment letter is a valid title, and argued the trial court's decision was sub judice given the pendency of HCCC No. 66 of 2009 concerning plot 212. The Respondent maintained he was the confirmed owner of plot 211, distinct from plot 212, supported by an allotment letter, search certificate, map and confirmation letters from the County Government and the National Land Commission. LC Komingoi, J framed three issues: sub judice, merit of the appeal, and costs. Applying section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act and the Supreme Court's exposition of the sub judice rule, the court held the 2nd Appellant, having participated in the trial to conclusion without seeking a stay, had to live with the judgment, though she could still enjoin the Respondent in ELC 101 of 2018. On the merits, the court re-evaluated the evidence as required on a first appeal and did not fault the trial magistrate's findings that the Respondent's land was validated as B906 (formerly 211 CBD). The appeal was dismissed with each party bearing own costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the trial court's decision was sub judice given pendency of HCCC No. 66 of 2009 (ELC 101 of 2018)

Holding

Sub judice doctrine not invoked in time; the 2nd Appellant allowed the suit to proceed to conclusion and must live with the judgment

Reasoning

Section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act bars trial of suits where the matter is directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit. However, the 2nd Appellant participated in CM ELC 206 of 2017 to its conclusion without applying for a stay to await determination of ELC 101 of 2018. Having not sought a stay, she must bear the consequences, though she may still enjoin the Respondent in the earlier suit.

p. 6
02

Whether the appeal against the trial court's judgment was meritorious

Holding

Appeal dismissed; the trial magistrate's findings that the Respondent's plot was validated as B906 (formerly 211 CBD) were not faulted

Reasoning

The court re-evaluated the evidence as required on a first appeal. The trial magistrate had found the 2nd Appellant's allotment letter inconclusive as to plot 212 after validation, while the Respondent's land was validated and confirmed by search certificate and letters from the NLC and County Government. On that evidence the appellate court found no basis to disturb the findings.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • A party who allows a suit to proceed to conclusion despite pendency of a related suit cannot later complain of sub judice; the remedy was an application for stay of proceedings
  • On a first appeal the court re-examines and evaluates the evidence and draws its own conclusions, while making allowance for not having seen or heard the witnesses

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Appeal dismissed
  2. 2.Each party to bear own costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 6
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 40
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 67
  • Land ActSection 9(2)

Cases cited (10)

  • Selle v. Associated Motor Boat Company
    (1968) EA 123

    Principles governing a first appeal: re-evaluation of evidence with allowance for not seeing or hearing witnesses.

  • Kenya National Commission on Human Rights v Attorney General; Independent Electoral & Boundaries Commission & 16 others (Interested Parties)
    [2020] eKLR

    Purpose and elements of the sub judice rule under section 6 of the Civil Procedure Act.

  • Rukaya Ali Mohamed v David Gikonyo Nambacha & another

    Allotment letter confers ownership unless challenged as fraudulently acquired.

  • Aster Holdings Ltd v City Council of Nairobi & 4 others
    (2017) eKLR

    Allotment and alienation of land.

  • Joseph Tobiko Kelempu v Cooperative Management Committee of Emparnat Farmers Dairy Cooperative Society Ltd
    [2021] eKLR

    County Surveyor not the allotting authority.

  • Nelson Muturi Ndumbeya Harun v County Government of Kajiado
    [2020] eKLR

    Allotment of land.

  • Benja Properties Limited v H.H. Dr. Syedna Mohammed Burhannudin Sahed & 4 others
    (2015) eKLR

    Allotment letters and ownership.

  • Faraj Maharus v J.B. Martin Glass Industries and 3 others
    C.A. 130/2003 (unreported)

    Doctrine of first in time among competing allottees.

  • Musk Deer Limited v Benjamin K. Kipkurui & another
    [2018] eKLR

    Buyer's duty of due diligence - caveat emptor.

  • Timothy Mutokaa Kariuki v Adan Maalim Ibrahim
    [2017] eKLR

    Where two plot numbers are different, a prima facie case cannot be found.

On appeal from
Chief Magistrate's Court at Kajiado
CMCC ELC No. 206 of 2017
Jurisdiction invoked
First appeal to the Environment and Land Court under the ELC Act against the judgment of the Chief Magistrate's Court

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Omar & another v Sambul", Case Analysis (2023). Environment and Land Appeal E003 of 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/21362/eng@2023-11-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.