Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedEnvironment & Land Case 393 of 2015· [2023] KEELC 20646 (KLR)

Kipkoech Lagat t/a Kaptarakwa Enterprises v Christopher Salleh & 4 others

Environment and Land Court
12 October 2023
1,049 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court refused to declare a co-operative society sole owner of land it holds for three other societies, and dismissed its bid to bar a member.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiff sued five defendants seeking orders that their use of portions of the suit premises (formerly housing his hotel, bar and butchery) was illegal, evictions, permanent and mandatory injunctions, special and general damages and costs. The 2nd to 4th Defendants did not enter appearance. The 5th Defendant, Keiyo Housing Co-operative Society, filed a defence and counter-claim seeking a declaration that it is the sole owner of Eldoret Municipality Block 7/72 and a permanent injunction restraining the Plaintiff from dealing with that title. On the hearing date neither the Plaintiff nor his counsel attended, and the Plaintiff's suit was dismissed, leaving the 1st and 5th Defendants to prosecute the counter-claim through Titus Komen Korir, the Society's Chairman. He testified that the Plaintiff was a tenant whose tenancy expired, that the Plaintiff was expelled from membership, and that prior proceedings before the Business Premises Rent Tribunal, the High Court (judicial review) and HCCC No. 160 of 2012 had gone against the Society. The court framed two issues: sole ownership of the suit property and whether an injunction should issue against the Plaintiff. It found the certificate of lease showed the 5th Defendant held the property for three other co-operative societies, defeating the claim to sole ownership. The alleged expulsion cited the wrong by-law and there was no evidence of an appeal, so the court could not find the Plaintiff had ceased to be a member. The counter-claim was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the 5th Defendant is the sole owner of LR No. Eldoret Municipality Block 7/72

Holding

No. The certificate of lease shows the 5th Defendant holds the property for three other co-operative societies, so it cannot be declared sole registered owner.

Reasoning

The court examined the certificate of lease produced as exhibit 1, which showed the 5th Defendant holding the suit property for Chepkorio Farmers', Metkei Farmers' and Kaptarakwa Co-operative Societies. Declaring the 5th Defendant sole owner would exclude those societies which came together under its umbrella. The counter-claim for a declaration of sole ownership therefore failed.

p. 3
02

Whether an injunction should issue against the Plaintiff

Holding

No. The expulsion of the Plaintiff from the 5th Defendant's membership was not proved to have been done under the correct by-law or to have been validly perfected, so the court could not find he ceased to be a member.

Reasoning

The expulsion was said to be under by-law number 20, but the 2008 by-laws provide for expulsion under clause 21, with a right of appeal at the next society meeting. There was no evidence of an appeal or of the next meeting. The court therefore had no basis to find the Plaintiff was not a member, and no injunction could issue against him.

p. 3

Legal principles established

#
  • A registered proprietor holding land on behalf of other societies cannot be declared sole owner to the exclusion of those for whom it holds the property.
  • A party asserting expulsion of a co-operative member must prove the expulsion complied with the correct by-law and that appeal rights were available and exhausted; absent such proof, membership is not displaced.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Plaintiff's suit was dismissed (for non-attendance at the hearing)
  2. 2.The 1st and 5th Defendants' counter-claim is dismissed with no order as to costs
Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over the suit property (Eldoret Municipality Block 7/72)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kipkoech Lagat t/a Kaptarakwa Enterprises v Christopher Salleh & 4 others", Case Analysis (2023). Environment & Land Case 393 of 2015. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/20646/eng@2023-10-12

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.