Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedCause 148 of 2022· [2023] KEELC 20261 (KLR)

Stephen Oddiaga v Kioko Sunza Kilonzo

Environment and Land Court
27 September 2023
4,902 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~20 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court in Mombasa moved a Taveta land dispute to Mombasa and merged it with a related case so everything is decided together.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiff, Stephen Oddiaga, moved the Environment and Land Court at Mombasa by Notice of Motion dated 15th March 2023 seeking transfer of ELC No. 015 of 2021 (Kioko Sunza Kilonzo v Stephen Oddiaga) from the Taveta Principal Magistrate's Court to the Mombasa ELC and its consolidation with the instant suit, with costs in the cause. The parties are locked in mutual allegations of trespass and boundary encroachment over neighbouring parcels Kimorigo/Kimorigo/278 and 285: the Defendant sued in Taveta for a permanent injunction and demolition of a perimeter wall, while the Plaintiff, administrator of the estate owning parcel 285, seeks removal of graves and vacant possession in Mombasa, and the Defendant filed a counter-claim mirroring his Taveta claim. The Defendant opposed, asserting the Taveta court's pecuniary jurisdiction (his parcel valued below Kshs 10,000,000), the inconvenience and expense to his Taveta-based witnesses, and the prior dismissal without appeal of the Plaintiff's preliminary objection on pecuniary jurisdiction. The court framed two issues: whether to withdraw, transfer and consolidate, and costs. Applying the Hangzhou Agrochemicals transfer factors and the consolidation principles in RMG v NG and Nyati Security, and invoking Sections 3A and 18(1)(b) of the Civil Procedure Act, the court found common questions of law and fact, held the reasons for transfer neither frivolous nor fanciful, and allowed the application in its entirety. The Taveta suit was transferred to Mombasa within 30 days, consolidated with the instant suit as lead file, with mention on 18th January 2024 and costs of the application in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether to withdraw, transfer and consolidate the Taveta suit with the Mombasa suit

Holding

Application allowed; the Taveta suit was transferred to the ELC at Mombasa and consolidated with the instant suit

Reasoning

The court held transfer is a judicial discretion to be exercised judiciously, not on whim or caprice. Applying the Hangzhou Agrochemicals factors and the consolidation principles in RMG v NG and Nyati Security, it found common questions of law and fact (mutual allegations of trespass and boundary encroachment over neighbouring parcels 278 and 285), that the reasons for transfer were not frivolous or fanciful, and that trying the suits together would determine all issues once and for all, relying on its inherent power under Section 3A.

p. 9
02

Costs of the application

Holding

Costs of the application were ordered to be in the cause

Reasoning

The court noted that costs are discretionary and that under Section 27(1) of the Civil Procedure Act costs follow the event, citing Supreme Court decisions. However, because the application was allowed and the suits were to be consolidated and heard together, it directed that costs of the application be in the cause rather than awarded to either party immediately.

Legal principles established

#
  • Transfer of a suit from a subordinate court to the ELC is a judicial discretion exercised judiciously and only where expedient and in the interest of justice
  • Consolidation is warranted where common questions of law or fact arise and the suits can conveniently be disposed of simultaneously

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion application dated 15th March, 2023 is found to have merit and is hereby allowed in its entirety
  2. 2.ELC No. 015 of 2021 – Kioko Sunza Kilonzo vs Stephen Oddiaga be and is hereby transferred pursuant to Section 18(1)(b) i), (ii) & (iii) of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap. 21 to the Mombasa ELC for trial and disposal within thirty (30) days
  3. 3.Upon transfer, that suit shall be consolidated with the instant suit, the instant file to be the lead file for filing records and taking down proceedings
  4. 4.Mention on 18th January, 2024 to confirm availability of the court file from Taveta Law Courts and for directions
  5. 5.Costs of the application shall be in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1A, 1B, 3A, 12, 18, 27(1)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 11 Rule 3(1)(h)
  • Constitution of Kenya2010 (general reference)

Cases cited (11)

  • Law Society of Kenya v Centre for Human Rights and Democracy and 12 Others
    Supreme Court Petition No. 14 of 2013 (2014) eKLR

    Essence and limits of consolidation; no undue advantage or injustice

  • Stumberg and another v Potgieter
    (1970) EA 323

    Consolidation where common questions of law or fact render joint disposal desirable

  • Idow Trading Company Limited v Mohammud Jimale & 2 others
    [2021] eKLR

    Consolidation serves the overriding objective - saving costs, time and effort

  • Transcend Media Group v The Standard Group Limited
    [2021] KLR

    Purpose of consolidation as cited within Idow Trading

  • Korean United Church of Kenya & 3 others v Seng Ha Sang
    [2014] eKLR

    Consolidation for expeditious and proportionate disposal of civil disputes

  • Nyati Security Guards & Services Ltd v Municipal Council of Mombasa
    (2004) eKLR

    Situations where consolidation can be ordered and where it is undesirable

  • David Kabungu v Zika Munga & 4 Others
    HCCC No. 36 of 1996 (in Kampala)

    Strong case required for transfer; balance of convenience, expense, hardship

  • Hangzhou Agrochemicals Industries Limited v Panda Flowers Ltd
    Civil Suit 97 of 2009 (2012) eKLR

    Factors for exercising discretion to transfer a suit

  • RMG v NG & Another
    [2013] eKLR

    Principles for ordering consolidation of suits

  • Jasbir Rai Singh v Tarchalan Singh
    eKLR (2014)

    Costs follow the event under Section 27(1)

  • Cecilia Karuru Ngayo v Barclays Bank of Kenya Limited
    eKLR (2014)

    Costs follow the event under Section 27(1)

Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 1A, 1B, 3A, 12 and 18(1)(b) of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap. 21

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Stephen Oddiaga v Kioko Sunza Kilonzo", Case Analysis (2023). Cause 148 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/20261/eng@2023-09-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.