Gichuhi & another v Progressive Credit & another
The bottom line
#The Environment and Land Court struck out a suit seeking to stop a property auction because mortgage disputes belong in the High Court, not the ELC.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over charge/mortgage disputes
The court lacks jurisdiction to entertain a suit that principally challenges the chargee's exercise of the statutory power of sale where title to the suit property is not challenged.
Counsel for the plaintiffs relied on Article 162(2)(b), Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act and Section 78 of the Land Act; defence counsel relied on Section 13 and the Court of Appeal decisions in Kangethe and Diamond Trust Bank. The court held those Court of Appeal decisions binding: since the suit challenges the statutory power of sale and not title, the ELC has no jurisdiction and must down its tools per Owners of Motor Vessel 'Lillian S'.
Legal principles established
#- Disputes relating to charges/mortgages fall outside the jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court.
- Superior courts below the Court of Appeal are bound by Court of Appeal pronouncements under the doctrine of stare decisis.
Court orders
#- 1.The suit is struck out on the ground of want of jurisdiction.
- 2.The plaintiffs shall bear costs of the suit.
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act (jurisdiction challenged; court held it lacked jurisdiction)
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Gichuhi & another v Progressive Credit & another", Case Analysis (2023). Environment & Land Case E030 of 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/20203/eng@2023-09-18
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.