Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutEnvironment & Land Case 607 of 2007· [2023] KEELC 20156 (KLR)

Patrick Ndolo Sakwa (Suing as an Administrator of the Estate of Hosea Sakwa Silunya) v Edward Ndege & Francis Nyaga Njeru

Environment and Land Court of Kenya
28 September 2023
2,009 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court struck out a landowner's lawsuit because he had been removed as estate administrator and never pleaded a damages claim.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Defendants filed a Notice of Motion dated 14 November 2022 seeking to strike out the Plaint dated 7 June 2016 in ELC No 607 of 2007 (consolidated with ELC No 251 of 2018, the lead file), on grounds that the suit was an abuse of process and that the Plaintiff lacked locus standi. They argued that a consent of 3 September 2021 in ELC No 251 of 2018 recorded the Plaintiff's withdrawal of the entire claim for Kshs 80,000,000 from Igbaro Realtors Limited, that the suit property had been sold so the Plaintiff had no proprietary rights, and that a rectified grant of 8 May 2019 in Nairobi HC Succession Cause No 4 of 2007 expunged the Plaintiff's name as administrator of the estate of Hosea Sakwa Silunya. The Plaintiff countered that the consent related only to ELC No 251 of 2018, that the Defendants were not parties to it, and that he now claimed only damages and costs for illegal demolitions. AA Omollo J framed two issues: locus standi and abuse of process. Applying El-Busaidy and Otieno v Ougo, the court held the Plaintiff's locus ended upon rectification of the grant. Though the Applicants were not parties to the consent, consolidation bound them by its effect; the injunction claim was overtaken by events since ownership had changed, and no damages claim was pleaded. The court struck out the Plaint with no order as to costs and awarded the Defendants the costs of the application.

Key legal issues

#
01

Locus standi of the Plaintiff

Holding

The Plaintiff lacks locus standi; the limited grant of 11 April 2008 was amended/rectified on 8 May 2019 excluding him as administrator and he tabled no evidence of interest in the estate.

Reasoning

Locus standi connotes a right to bring action and requires a legal interest, vested or contingent, in the subject matter. The limited grant issued to the Plaintiff alongside four others was rectified on 8 May 2019 excluding his name. He produced no evidence of any interest in the estate, so his locus to sustain the suit ended upon rectification of the grant.

02

Whether the suit is an abuse of court process after the consent in the consolidated suit

Holding

Yes. The consolidated suits bound the parties; the consent changed ownership of the suit property, rendering the injunction claim overtaken by events, and no damages claim was pleaded.

Reasoning

Although the Applicants were not parties to the consent of 3 September 2021, the suits having been consolidated they were bound by orders in ELC 251 of 2018. The consent transferred ownership of the suit property for Kshs 80,000,000, so the permanent injunction sought cannot issue over property no longer owned by the deceased or his estate. The only remaining claim, damages, was never pleaded.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • A litigant is clothed with locus standi upon obtaining a limited or full grant of letters of administration; where the grant is rectified to exclude a person, his locus to sustain the suit ends.
  • An action brought as administrator before taking out letters of administration is incompetent from inception.
  • Upon consolidation, parties become bound by orders made in the consolidated suit.
  • Parties are bound by their pleadings; a claimant is deemed to claim only that which he pleaded.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Plaint dated June 7, 2016 together with the list of witnesses, witness statement and the list of documents be struck out with no order as to costs
  2. 2.The costs of the application dated November 14, 2022 awarded to the Defendants/Applicants

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Rules (implied by reference to 'Order ..')Order .. (provision left blank in judgment)

Cases cited (4)

  • Khelef Khalifa El-Busaidy v Commissioner of Lands & 2 others
    [2002] eKLR

    Definition of locus standi - a party must have a legal interest, vested or contingent, in the subject matter.

  • Otieno v Ougo
    [1986-1989] EALR 468

    An action brought as administrator before taking out letters of administration is incompetent from inception.

  • Sisilia Nyakoe & Another v Attorney General & 4 others
    [2021] eKLR

    Cited by Defendants on locus standi of a non-administrator.

  • Christopher Mutiembu Machimbo & 3 Others v County Surveyor, Trans-Nzoia & 4 others
    [2022] eKLR

    Cited by Defendants on locus standi of a non-administrator.

Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over the suit property L R No 36/VII/157, Eastleigh, Nairobi

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Patrick Ndolo Sakwa (Suing as an Administrator of the Estate of Hosea Sakwa Silunya) v Edward Ndege & Francis Nyaga Njeru", Case Analysis (2023). Environment & Land Case 607 of 2007. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/20156/eng@2023-09-28

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.