Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutEnvironment and Land Miscellaneous Application E067 of 2023· [2023] KEELC 20073 (KLR)

Makongeni Residents Association (MARA) v Kenya Railways Staff Retirement Benefits Scheme (KRSRBS); Attorney General & 5 others (Interested Parties); Ministry of Finance (Intended Interested Party); Kenya Railways Corporation (Intended Respondent)

Environment and Land Court
19 September 2023
3,313 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~13 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court struck out a railway workers union's application because a non-advocate filed it and pension disputes belong in the Employment and Labour Relations Court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by Mogeni J of the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi disposed of a Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 20/07/2023 raised against an application dated 11/07/2023 filed by the Rift Valley Railways Workers Union (4th Interested Party) seeking, among other things, to stay the 9th Members Annual General Meeting convened by the Respondent Scheme and directions concerning the trustees of the Kenya Railways Staff Retirement Benefits Scheme. The objection contended that the court lacked jurisdiction, that the union's application was prosecuted by its Secretary General, Mr Munayi Isaac Opondo, a non-advocate, contrary to sections 31 and 34 of the Advocates Act read with Order 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules, and that the application was an abuse of process. The court first applied Mukisa Biscuits and Oraro v Mbaja on the nature of preliminary objections, holding that capacity and jurisdiction are pure points of law fit for preliminary determination, and rejected the argument that an objection must specify the statute violated. It held that Mr Munayi, not being an advocate, had no right of audience before the ELC; the representation exceptions in the Labour Relations Act and the ELRC Act apply only in the Employment and Labour Relations Court. It further found that the issues raised, concerning pensions, trusts and trusteeship, fall within the ELRC's jurisdiction, not the ELC's. The preliminary objection was allowed in full, disposing of the application dated 11/07/2023.

Key legal issues

#
01

Validity of the preliminary objection

Holding

The objection met the Mukisa Biscuits criteria: it raised pure points of law (capacity and jurisdiction) capable of disposing of the application without ascertaining facts

Reasoning

The court applied Mukisa Biscuits and Oraro v Mbaja, holding that a preliminary objection must be a point of law not blurred by factual details or discretion. Capacity of a party and jurisdiction are points of law fit for preliminary determination, and the court is under a duty to determine jurisdiction first.

p. 3
02

Whether a non-advocate Secretary General could file and prosecute the application

Holding

Mr Munayi Isaac Opondo, not being an advocate, could not represent the union before the ELC; sections 31 and 34 of the Advocates Act bar unqualified persons from acting, and no section 83 exception applied

Reasoning

Section 9 of the Advocates Act requires admission, a Roll entry and a practising certificate. Sections 31 and 34 prohibit unqualified persons from instituting or carrying on proceedings. The Labour Relations Act and ELRC Act exceptions apply only in the ELRC, not the ELC, and no written authority from the union was produced.

p. 7
03

Jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over the dispute

Holding

The issues in the application, concerning trusteeship, pensions and retirement benefits, fall within the Employment and Labour Relations Court, not the ELC

Reasoning

The ELC is established under Article 162(2)(b) with exclusive jurisdiction over environment and land disputes. The application concerned the running of a pension trust and trustees' appointments, matters the court found belong to the ELRC, a constitutionally distinct court.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • A preliminary objection raising locus standi need not state the specific law violated, provided it is a pure point of law
  • Lack of capacity of a party to appear before a court deprives the court of jurisdiction over that party and its pleadings
  • Representation rights under the Labour Relations Act and the Employment and Labour Relations Court Act do not confer a right of audience before the Environment and Land Court

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 20/07/2023 is allowed in terms of all its prayers, including that the application dated 11/07/2023 be struck out and dismissed with costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010Article 162(2)(b)
  • Advocates Actsections 9, 31, 34, 83, 84
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 9
  • Labour Relations Actsection 2(a) and (c)
  • Employment and Labour Relations Court Actsection 22
  • State Corporations ActCap 446

Cases cited (6)

  • Mukisa Biscuits Manufacturing Ltd. v West End Distributors Ltd.
    Civil Appeal No. 9 of 1969 (1969) EA 696

    Definition of a preliminary objection as a pure point of law

  • Oraro v Mbaja
    [2005] 1 KLR 141

    A preliminary objection must not be blurred with factual details requiring proof

  • Alfred Njau and others v City Council of Nairobi
    (1982) KAR 229

    Definition of locus standi as a right to appear in court

  • Law Society of Kenya v Commissioner of Lands & Others
    Nakuru High Court Civil Case No. 464 of 2000

    Locus standi signifies a right to be heard with sufficient interest

  • Peterson Ndungu, Stephen Gichanga Gituro, N. Ojwang, Peter Kariuki, Joseph M. Kyavi & James Kimani v. Kenya Power & Lightning Company Ltd
    (2018) eKLR

    Qualifications to practise as an advocate under section 9 of the Advocates Act

  • Pius Njogu Kathuri v. Joseph Kiragu Muthura & 3 others
    (2018) eKLR

    Similar principle on advocate qualification

Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution (Environment and Land Court)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Makongeni Residents Association (MARA) v Kenya Railways Staff Retirement Benefits Scheme (KRSRBS); Attorney General & 5 others (Interested Parties); Ministry of Finance (Intended Interested Party); Kenya Railways Corporation (Intended Respondent)", Case Analysis (2023). Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application E067 of 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/20073/eng@2023-09-19

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.