Mungai v Njunge
The bottom line
#A Kenyan court confirmed magistrates can punish contempt of their own injunctions, but struck out the application for being filed in the wrong forum.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Jurisdiction of the Magistrate's Court to punish for contempt of its orders
The Magistrate's Court has jurisdiction to punish for contempt of its own orders, including temporary injunctions, by virtue of Section 10 of the Magistrates' Court Act, 2015 which came into force on 2 January 2016
The court analysed Section 10 of the Magistrates' Court Act and case law. Prior to 2015 magistrates had no contempt powers, which rested in the High Court (read ELC) and Court of Appeal. The 2015 Act gave magistrates unlimited jurisdiction to punish for contempt. The nullification of the Contempt of Court Act in 2018 did not affect Section 10(3) of the Magistrates' Court Act. Since the disobeyed orders were a temporary injunction, the magistrate's court has jurisdiction.
Legal principles established
#- The Magistrates' Court has jurisdiction under Section 10 of the Magistrates' Court Act, 2015 to punish for contempt of its own orders, including interlocutory orders such as temporary injunctions
Court orders
#- 1.The application dated 27/1/2023 is struck out to enable the Applicant mount the application in the right fora
- 2.No orders as to costs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Environment and Land Court Act jurisdiction over contempt of orders issued in a subordinate court land suit; Section 10 of the Magistrates' Court Act considered
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Mungai v Njunge", Case Analysis (2023). Miscellaneous Application E011 'B' of 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/19958/eng@2023-09-19
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.