Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutEnvironment & Land Case 174 of 2015· [2023] KEELC 19918 (KLR)

Kibowen v Ruto & 15 others

Environment and Land Court
22 September 2023
1,122 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court struck out land defendants' transfer application because they ignored an order to file written submissions, and barred future applications without permission.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Nakuru (FM Njoroge, J) disposed of the defendants' Notice of Motion dated May 17, 2023, brought under Sections 1, 1A, 3, 3A and 18(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, seeking transfer of the suit from Nakuru to Kabarnet Law Courts. The defendants, residents of Baringo County who occupy the suit property, argued that attending hearings in Nakuru was expensive and that Kabarnet had jurisdiction. The plaintiff opposed, deposing that he was declared owner of the suit property in ELC Civil Case No 218 of 2014, that the property at Muserechi is 38.9 km from Nakuru versus 119 km from Kabarnet, that under Section 14 of the 2014 Practice Directions land cases should be filed in the nearest Environment and Land Court, and that the place-of-trial issue was already settled in a ruling of February 15, 2018, rendering the application res judicata and an abuse of process. He also filed a preliminary objection on those grounds, including that the supporting affidavit was undated. The court directed that the motion be canvassed by written submissions, with default resulting in automatic striking out. The defendants filed no submissions. The court struck out the application, awarded costs to the plaintiff, restrained the defendants from filing further applications without leave of court, and directed a virtual mention on October 18, 2023 for issuance of a hearing date.

Key legal issues

#
01

Consequence of failure to file submissions as directed

Holding

The application stands automatically struck out as directed by the court's order of June 20, 2023

Reasoning

The court had directed that the motion be heard by written submissions, with default resulting in automatic striking out. The defendants did not file submissions within three days and no other mode of disposal was provided. The court emphasised respect for court orders and noted a pattern of delay tactics by the defendants, including multiple needless applications.

p. 3
02

Res judicata and abuse of process regarding place of trial

Holding

The plaintiff argued the issue of place of trial was settled in the ruling of February 15, 2018, rendering the transfer application res judicata; the court did not determine this because the application was struck out

Reasoning

The plaintiff deposed that a prior ruling held the suit property is 41.6 kilometres from Nakuru and that the suit was properly filed in Nakuru. He also raised a preliminary objection that the application was res judicata, defective and an abuse of process. The court did not rule on these grounds, disposing of the matter instead on the failure to file submissions.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An applicant who is ordered to file written submissions and fails to do so fails to prosecute the application, which may be struck out regardless of whether the adversary filed submissions
  • A court may restrain a party who repeatedly files needless applications from filing further applications without leave

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The defendants' Notice of Motion dated May 17, 2023 is automatically struck out for failure to file written submissions as ordered
  2. 2.The applicants shall bear the costs of the application
  3. 3.The defendants shall not file any other application in future without leave of court, formally applied for with justification
  4. 4.The suit to be mentioned virtually on October 18, 2023 for issuance of a hearing date

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1, 1A, 3, 3A, 18(1)
  • Gazette Notice No 5178 of July 28, 2014 - Practice Directions on proceedings in the Environment and Land CourtsSection 14
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 1, 1A, 3, 3A and 18(1) of the Civil Procedure Act (application for transfer); Environment and Land Court jurisdiction over land use and occupation disputes

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kibowen v Ruto & 15 others", Case Analysis (2023). Environment & Land Case 174 of 2015. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/19918/eng@2023-09-22

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.