Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedEnvironment & Land Case 319 of 2008· [2023] KEELC 19282 (KLR)

Noorani v Ochieng & another

Environment and Land Court
27 July 2023
1,034 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The 2nd Defendant, Onesmus G Githinji, advocate for the defendants, applied by Chamber Summons dated May 2, 2023 to set aside a ruling on the plaintiff's party and party bill of costs and to have it remitted to a different Deputy Registrar for taxation. He contended that the taxing officer's ruling of April 25, 2023, taxing the bill at Kshs. 557,100, was rendered per incuriam of the court's orders of December 7, 2022, which directed that costs be calculated from May 14, 2013, thereby awarding the plaintiff costs incurred before that date. The plaintiff opposed, arguing the application was incompetent as a challenge to a taxing officer's decision lies only by way of reference under Rule 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, that no ruling by Hon. Mary Osoro dated March 16, 2023 existed on record as the application alleged, and that no Rule 11 notice of objection had been filed. The court found the application defective for seeking to set aside a non-existent ruling, and noted the applicant's non-compliance with the Rule 11 reference procedure. Nonetheless, invoking Article 159 of the Constitution and noting the application was filed within 14 days of the actual ruling, the court determined it on its merits. It held the Deputy Registrar had expressly taken the December 7, 2022 orders into account, disallowing items covering pre-May 14, 2013 costs, and that instruction and getting up fees were properly included since the case was underway by 2013. The application was dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.

Key legal issues

#
01

Competency of the application to set aside the taxation ruling

Holding

The application was defective because it sought to set aside a non-existent ruling by Hon. Mary Osoro on a bill dated November 11, 2022, when the actual ruling was delivered by I.N Barasa on April 25, 2023 on a bill dated September 9, 2022

Reasoning

The plaintiff demonstrated there was no record of a ruling by Hon. Mary Osoro or a bill dated November 11, 2022. The applicant also failed to file the notice required under Rule 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order before mounting a challenge to the taxing officer's decision. The court nonetheless, invoking Article 159, proceeded to determine the application on its merits since it was filed within 14 days of the actual ruling.

p. 2
02

Whether the taxation ruling was per incuriam of the December 7, 2022 orders

Holding

No - the Deputy Registrar expressly took the December 7, 2022 orders into account and disallowed items covering costs incurred prior to May 14, 2013

Reasoning

The Deputy Registrar's ruling quoted the court's variation of the decree, directing interest at 14% and costs calculated from May 14, 2013, and consequently disallowed items 4 to 18, 41 to 72, 119 to 130, 139 to 158 and 187 to 203. The court found no error, noting that by 2013 the case was underway so instruction and getting up fees were properly factored into the bill.

Legal principles established

#
  • An objection to a taxing officer's ruling must follow the Rule 11 procedure of the Advocates Remuneration Order, beginning with a notice within 14 days identifying the items objected to
  • A court may nonetheless determine an improperly framed application on its merits in the interest of substantive justice under Article 159 of the Constitution where filed within 14 days of the taxing officer's ruling

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The 2nd Defendant's Chamber Summons application dated May 2, 2023 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application awarded to the plaintiff

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159
  • Advocates Remuneration OrderRule 11

Cases cited (1)

  • Elijah Njuguna Njoki v Peter Muriu Njuguna & 4 others
    [2021] eKLR

    Summary of the four-step procedure for a reference under Rule 11 of the Advocates Remuneration Order

Jurisdiction invoked
Original civil jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over costs taxation in ELC Case 319 of 2008; Article 159 of the Constitution invoked on substantive determination

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Noorani v Ochieng & another", Case Analysis (2023). Environment & Land Case 319 of 2008. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/19282/eng@2023-07-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.