Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedEnvironment & Land Petition E018 of 2023· [2023] KEELC 19108 (KLR)

Mutula Kilonzo Junior & Kethi D Kilonzo t/a Kilonzo & Company Advocates v Kenya Urban Roads Authority & 2 others

Environment and Land Court
27 July 2023
2,753 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court refused to halt a road project or Tribunal proceedings, ruling it can only hear appeals from the National Environment Tribunal.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The petitioners, advocates whose offices are at Kay Group Centre, moved the Environment and Land Court by application dated April 25, 2023 seeking an injunction/stay restraining the Kenya Urban Roads Authority and others from constructing a footbridge near their premises, and a stay of proceedings before the National Environment Tribunal, where they had earlier filed an appeal challenging the EIA licences for the project. The 1st and 3rd Respondents opposed, contending the court lacked jurisdiction, that the doctrine of exhaustion applied, that the matter was sub judice before the Tribunal, and that the footbridge was substantially complete. The court framed two issues: whether to stay the Tribunal's proceedings, and whether conservatory orders should issue. On the first, it held that the Tribunal, established under Section 125(1) and clothed with jurisdiction over environmental licences under Section 129 of EMCA, could not be interfered with; the ELC's role is appellate under Section 130. Relying on the Supreme Court's Kibos Distillers decision, it found the stay prayer unmerited, noting it also contradicted the petition itself. On the second, the court found the injunction application before the Tribunal undetermined and the present application sub judice, applying the sub judice rule from the Law Society of Kenya ex parte case and the equitable discretion in Paul Gitonga Wanjau. The application was dismissed with costs to abide the outcome of the suit, and any interim injunction or status quo orders were discharged.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the ELC can stay proceedings before the National Environment Tribunal

Holding

The court cannot stay Tribunal proceedings; the Tribunal is clothed with jurisdiction over environmental licences under Sections 125 and 129 of EMCA and the ELC's role is appellate only.

Reasoning

The court noted the Tribunal is established under Section 125(1) of EMCA and clothed with jurisdiction over environmental licences under Section 129, with appeals lying to the ELC under Section 130. Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Benson Ambuti Adege v Kibos Distillers, constitutional issues on environmental rights should be reserved pending the Tribunal's determination of EIA licence validity. The stay prayer was also internally inconsistent with the petition, which asked that construction be halted until the Tribunal determined the appeal.

p. 5
02

Whether conservatory/injunctive orders should issue

Holding

No. The same injunction application was pending undetermined before the Tribunal, rendering the present application sub judice; an injunction being an equitable remedy, the court declined to grant it.

Reasoning

The petitioner had filed an injunction application before the Tribunal on March 17, 2023, and there was no evidence it was fully determined. Invoking the sub judice rule as articulated in the Law Society of Kenya ex parte case, the court held that parallel litigation on the same cause of action, subject matter and relief should not be entertained by courts of concurrent jurisdiction, to avoid contradictory verdicts and multiplicity of proceedings.

Legal principles established

#
  • The Environment and Land Court has no jurisdiction to interfere with proceedings of the National Environment Tribunal; it may only hear appeals from the Tribunal under Section 130 of EMCA.
  • Where a parallel application on the same cause of action is pending before the Tribunal, a similar application before the ELC is sub judice and should not be entertained.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated April 25, 2023 is dismissed.
  2. 2.Costs of the application shall abide the outcome of the suit.
  3. 3.Any orders of injunction or status quo given herein are discharged.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Environmental Management and Co-ordination ActSection 129(4)
  • Environmental Management and Co-ordination ActSection 125(1)
  • Environmental Management and Co-ordination ActSection 129
  • Environmental Management and Co-ordination ActSection 130
  • Environmental (Impact Assessment and Audit) RegulationsRegulation 25(2)
  • Environmental (Impact Assessment and Audit) RegulationsRegulation 17
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 42 Rule 6
  • Environment and Land Court Act
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 50

Cases cited (13)

  • National Management Authority & 3 others v Maraba Lwatingu Residents Association & 505 others
    [2020] eKLR

    Cited by petitioner on due process and EIA licence requirements

  • Moffat Kamau & 9 others v Aelous Kenya Limited & 9 others
    [2016] eKLR

    Cited by petitioner on environmental compliance

  • Owners of the Motor Vessel "Lilian S" v Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd
    [1989] eKLR

    Jurisdiction must be determined at the outset; court lacks jurisdiction where matter pending before Tribunal

  • William Odhiambo Ramogi & 33 others v Attorney General & 4 others; Muslims for Human Rights & 2 others (Interested Parties)
    [2020] eKLR

    Doctrine of exhaustion of alternative dispute fora

  • Muchanga Investments Ltd v Safaris Unlimited (Africa) Ltd & 2 others
    [2009] eKLR

    Courts should guard against abuse of process and bad faith litigation

  • Mumo Matemu v Trusted Society of Human Rights Alliance & 5 others
    [2013] eKLR

    Judicial time and obligation to prevent bad faith proceedings

  • Giella v Cassman Brown
    (1973) EA 358

    Conditions for grant of interlocutory injunction

  • Lulchand Fulchnad Shah v Investments and Mortgages Bank Limited & 5 others
    [2018] eKLR

    Stay of proceedings of an independent body only where it acted illegally, irrationally or with impropriety

  • Morgan Air Cargo Limited v Everest Enterprises Limited
    [2014] eKLR

    Costs follow the event

  • Cecilia Karuru Ngayu v Barclays Bank of Kenya & another
    [2016] eKLR

    Costs - respondents should not be condemned to pay costs

  • Benson Ambuti Adege & 2 Others v Kibos Distillers Limited & 5 Others
    (2020) eKLR

    Superior courts should reserve constitutional environmental issues pending the Tribunal's determination of EIA licence validity

  • Republic v Paul Kihara Kariuki, Attorney General & 2 others Ex parte Law Society of Kenya
    [2020] eKLR

    Sub judice rule - courts of concurrent jurisdiction should not entertain parallel litigation on the same cause of action

  • Paul Gitonga Wanjau v Gathuthi Tea Factory Company Ltd & 2 others
    [2016] eKLR

    Injunction is an equitable remedy exercised at the court's discretion

Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and the Environment and Land Court Act (court's jurisdiction under Section 130 EMCA limited to appeals from the National Environment Tribunal)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mutula Kilonzo Junior & Kethi D Kilonzo t/a Kilonzo & Company Advocates v Kenya Urban Roads Authority & 2 others", Case Analysis (2023). Environment & Land Petition E018 of 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/19108/eng@2023-07-27

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.