Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCStruck OutEnvironment and Land Appeal E15 of 2023· [2023] KEELC 18704 (KLR)

Njoroge v Gichumu

Environment and Land Court
17 July 2023
1,652 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan land appeal was struck out because the appellant sought an injunction on appeal without ever asking the trial court first.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The plaintiff, Susan Wanjiku Njoroge, filed a Notice of Motion dated May 12, 2023 in her appeal against orders in Nakuru CMC No E168 of 2022 (Margaret Njeri Gichumu v Susan Wanjiku Njoroge), seeking a stay of proceedings in the lower court pending appeal and an injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with LR NO Miti Mingi/Mbaruk Block 11/793. The background was that the defendant had obtained ex parte injunctive orders in the lower court on November 15, 2022; the plaintiff's application to discharge those orders for alleged concealment of material facts was dismissed on April 25, 2023, and she appealed. The defendant opposed, asserting she is the registered proprietor of the suit land, was never party to any land exchange agreement, and that the appeal was a ruse to avoid contempt proceedings. The application was disposed of by written submissions. The court found no substantive error in the trial magistrate's orders, which merely required the plaintiff to cease construction pending hearing - a partial maintenance of the status quo. It noted that the lower court had disposed of two applications simultaneously without notice, which would have been a triable issue had it been pleaded in the memorandum of appeal, but no such ground appeared. Critically, the court held that the plaintiff should have sought injunctive relief in the lower court first, and that granting the injunction on appeal would amount to entertaining it in the first instance and condoning abuse of process. The application dated May 12, 2023 and the entire appeal were struck out with costs to the defendant.

Key legal issues

#
01

Stay of proceedings pending appeal

Holding

Refused; the trial court's order was substantively sound and the appeal disclosed no merit.

Reasoning

The lower court's orders merely required the plaintiff to cease construction pending hearing, maintaining partial status quo. The court found no error in substance, and the only potentially arguable ground (simultaneous disposal of two motions without notice) was not raised in the memorandum of appeal.

02

Injunction pending appeal

Holding

Refused as an abuse of process because the plaintiff never sought injunctive relief in the trial court.

Reasoning

The plaintiff had only applied to set aside the ex parte injunctive orders below. Having failed there, she could not come to the ELC seeking fresh injunctions in the first instance; the proper course was to appeal any denial of such orders.

03

Simultaneous disposal of two applications without notice

Holding

Procedurally improper, but the ground was not pleaded in the memorandum of appeal so it could not sustain the appeal.

Reasoning

The court observed that the lower court disposed of two motions simultaneously without notice, which would have raised a triable issue had it been pleaded; since it was absent from the memorandum of appeal, the appeal lacked the sole ground that could have given it merit.

Legal principles established

#
  • A party seeking injunctive relief pending appeal must first have sought such relief in the trial court; an appellate court will not entertain the application in the first instance.
  • Where a court intends to hear two applications simultaneously it must inform the parties so they may address both.
  • Litigants must state their case expressly and not presume the court will go out of its way to save them.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The application dated May 12, 2023 and the entire appeal filed by the plaintiff are struck out
  2. 2.Costs of the application and appeal awarded to the defendant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1A, 1B, 3A, 6, 79G
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 42 rule 6 (rules 6(1), 6(6)), Order 43 rule 1

Cases cited (5)

  • Christopher Ndolo Mutuku & Another v Stanbic CFC Bank Ltd
    2015 eKLR

    Stay of execution/orders to avoid parallel proceedings on the same subject matter

  • Patricia Njeri & 3 Others v The National Museum of Kenya
    2004 eKLR

    Principles for considering an application for injunction pending appeal

  • Vincent Orinda Nyambane & Another v Daniel Nyangaresi Orinda & Another
    2021 eKLR

    Principles for considering an application for injunction pending appeal

  • Global Tours & Travels Ltd
    NBI HC WC No 43 of 2000

    Respondent's submissions on stay of proceedings

  • Kenya Wildlife Service v James Mutembei
    2019 eKLR

    Respondent's submissions opposing stay of proceedings

On appeal from
Chief Magistrate's Court at Nakuru
CMC No E168 of 2022 - Margaret Njeri Gichumu v Susan Wanjiku Njoroge
Jurisdiction invoked
Appellate jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over the lower court; application brought under sections 1A, 1B, 3A, 6, 79G of the Civil Procedure Act and Orders 42 rule 6 and 43 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Njoroge v Gichumu", Case Analysis (2023). Environment and Land Appeal E15 of 2023. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/18704/eng@2023-07-17

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.