Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedEnvironment & Land Case 10 of 2020· [2023] KEELC 18521 (KLR)

Kipyegon v Chumo & another

Environment and Land Court
6 July 2023
4,245 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~17 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court ruled that family land claims based on customary trust are not blocked by time limits, so the siblings' case can proceed to full hearing.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by the Environment and Land Court at Kericho (M.C. Oundo, J) determines a preliminary objection raised by the 1st and 2nd Defendants in a suit between siblings over the estate of their deceased father, Kiprob Arap Chumo. The Plaintiff sought an injunction restraining further dealings with Kericho/Kabartegan/1013, 1135, 1851 and 1852 (formerly Kericho/Kabartegan/74) and revocation of the resulting title deeds so the land could be subdivided into seven equal portions. The Defendants, registered proprietors of the subdivided parcels, contended the transfers by their father in 1997 and 2002 were absolute and that the suit, filed in 2020, was barred by section 4 of the Limitation of Actions Act and section 99 of the Land Act, disclosed no reasonable cause of action and was an abuse of process. The Plaintiff responded that the Defendants held the land in customary trust for the seven siblings, that the fraud was only discovered in 2019, and that section 20 of the Limitation of Actions Act exempts beneficiary actions in respect of trust property. Applying the Mukisa Biscuits principles and relying on Macharia Kihari v Ngigi Kihari and Stephens v Stephens, the court held that limitation does not apply to actions by beneficiaries under a customary trust to recover trust property or for fraudulent breach of trust. The preliminary objection was dismissed with costs to the Plaintiff, and parties were directed to comply with Order 11 within 30 days to fast-track the hearing. The substantive trust claim remains for trial.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the plaintiff's suit is barred by limitation under section 4 of the Limitation of Actions Act and section 99 of the Land Act

Holding

The objection fails; the claim is founded on trust, and section 20 of the Limitation of Actions Act exempts beneficiary actions in respect of fraud or recovery of trust property from limitation periods.

Reasoning

The court found the plaintiff's claim is based on customary trust, the defendants holding title for the siblings as beneficiaries of the deceased's estate. Section 20(1)(2) of the Limitation of Actions Act provides that no limitation period applies to a beneficiary's action in respect of fraud or fraudulent breach of trust or to recover trust property. The Court of Appeal in Macharia Kihari and Stephens confirmed limitation does not apply to customary law trusts.

02

Whether the preliminary objection is a proper point of law capable of disposing of the suit

Holding

Applying Mukisa Biscuits principles, the objection was considered but found to lack merit.

Reasoning

The court applied the Mukisa Biscuits test that a preliminary objection must consist of a point of law capable of disposing of the suit. Having framed the issues, the court nonetheless determined the objection on its merits and dismissed it with costs, holding the trust claim fell outside limitation.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • Limitation periods under the Limitation of Actions Act do not apply to actions by a beneficiary under a trust, including customary trusts, to recover trust property or for fraudulent breach of trust.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The preliminary objection by the 1st and 2nd Defendants is dismissed with costs to the Plaintiff.
  2. 2.The parties shall fast track the hearing of the case by complying with the provisions of Order 11 of the Civil Procedure Rules within 30 days.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Limitation of Actions Actsection 4
  • Limitation of Actions Actsection 7
  • Limitation of Actions Actsection 20(1)(2)
  • Limitation of Actions Actsection 26
  • Land Actsection 99
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 2 Rule 15(1)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 11

Cases cited (9)

  • Sohanlaldurgadass Rajput & another v Divisional Intergrated Development Programmes Co. Ltd
    Machakos ELC No. 50 of 2020

    Limitation barring suit filed outside statutory period

  • Dickson Negige Ngugi v Consulidated Bank Ltd & another
    Nakuru ELC No. 583 of 2016

    Limitation barring suit filed outside statutory period

  • Eunice Kemunto Nyaundi & 6 others v Charles Nyangai
    Kisii ELC No. 489 of 2015

    Absolute registration without express trust in title deeds

  • Martha Thairora Gikundi v Elizabeth Kananu & another
    Meru ELC No. 307 of 2014

    Trust must be expressly indicated in the document

  • Michael Kalani Muatha v Kyalo Mwikya & another
    [2022] eKLR

    Striking out pleadings is a drastic remedy for complete shams

  • Kimani Ruchine & another v Swift Rutherford & Co. Ltd & another
    (1980) KLR 10

    Limitation runs afresh whenever there are changes in title

  • Mukisa Biscuits Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Limited
    (1969) E.A. 696

    Definition and principles of a preliminary objection

  • Macharia Kihari v Ngigi Kihari
    [1994] eKLR

    Limitation under section 20(2) does not apply to customary law trusts

  • Stephens & 6 others v Stephens & another
    [1987] eKLR

    No limitation plea available to a defaulting fiduciary in possession of trust property

Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution (Environment and Land Court) - implied; suit filed under Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kipyegon v Chumo & another", Case Analysis (2023). Environment & Land Case 10 of 2020. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/18521/eng@2023-07-06

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.