Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedEnvironment and Land Appeal E108 of 2022· [2023] KEELC 18498 (KLR)

Muthoki Brothers Company Limited v Masanga

Environment and Land Court
11 May 2023
3,710 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~15 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Appellant, Muthoki Brothers Company Limited, moved the Environment and Land Court by Notice of Motion dated 4 November 2022 seeking leave to appeal out of time against the judgment of Hon G.M Gitonga delivered on 11 October 2022 in CM ELC No 993 of 2020, a stay of execution of that judgment, and an order deeming its Notice of Appeal duly filed. The Respondent opposed, arguing that an appeal to the ELC must be instituted by Memorandum of Appeal, not a Notice of Appeal, and that substantial loss and security had not been demonstrated. Angote J framed two issues: whether the threshold for leave to appeal out of time was met, and whether grounds for stay of execution pending appeal were satisfied. On jurisdiction, the court relied on Sections 13(1) and 16A of the Environment and Land Court Act and Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act. Adopting Abubaker Mohamed Al-Amin vs Firdaus Siwa Somo and Geoffrey Maina Njuguna vs Waweru Ndirangu, the court held that the proviso to Section 79G applies both prospectively and retrospectively, so leave may be granted before an appeal is filed. The application having been filed within 30 days of judgment, and the delay thereafter explained by the registry's failure to avail a typed copy of the judgment, the court granted leave to file the appeal within 30 days. However, the court agreed with the Respondent that no appeal was properly before it, a Notice of Appeal being unknown in appeals from subordinate courts to the ELC, and following Rosalindi Wanjiku Macharia and Waithera vs Kalakacha held that stay of execution under Order 42 Rule 6 requires an existing appeal as a condition precedent. Stay was therefore refused. The application partly succeeded; costs were awarded in the appeal.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether leave to appeal out of time can be granted before an appeal is filed

Holding

Yes - Section 79G's proviso covers both appeals already filed out of time and appeals yet to be filed

Reasoning

Relying on Abubaker Mohamed Al-Amin vs Firdaus Siwa Somo and Geoffrey Maina Njuguna vs Waweru Ndirangu, the court adopted the interpretation that 'admitted out of time' connotes both allowing an appeal to be filed out of time and admitting an appeal already filed. The word 'admitted' is not restricted to appeals already lodged.

p. 5
02

Whether the applicant explained the delay in filing the appeal

Holding

Yes - the application was filed within 30 days; the delay arose from the registry's failure to avail a typed copy of the judgment

Reasoning

The judgment was delivered on 11 October 2022 and the application filed on 4 November 2022, within the 30-day period, so there was no delay when filed. The subsequent lapse of time was attributable to the registry's failure to provide the typed judgment, which the applicant demonstrated through correspondence and follow-ups.

p. 5
03

Whether stay of execution pending appeal could be granted

Holding

No - no appeal existed before the court, so the discretion under Order 42 Rule 6 could not be invoked

Reasoning

Following Abubaker Mohamed Al-Amin and Waithera vs Kalakacha, the court held that the filing of an appeal, in the form of a memorandum of appeal, is a condition precedent to exercising jurisdiction under Order 42 Rule 6. Since only a Notice of Appeal had been filed, the court would be acting in vacuo in granting stay.

p. 7

Legal principles established

#
  • The proviso to Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act applies both prospectively and retrospectively; leave may be sought before or after the memorandum of appeal is filed
  • An appeal from a subordinate court to the ELC is commenced by Memorandum of Appeal, not a Notice of Appeal
  • Existence of an appeal is a condition precedent to granting stay of execution under Order 42 Rule 6

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Applicant be and is hereby granted leave to file an Appeal within 30 days of the date hereof
  2. 2.The costs of the application shall be in the Appeal

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Environment and Land Court ActSections 13(1), 13(2), 16A(1), 16A(2)
  • Civil Procedure ActSection 79G, Section 95
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 42 Rule 1, Order 42 Rule 6, Order 50 Rule 6

Cases cited (21)

  • First American Bank of Kenya Ltd vs Gulab P Shah & 2 Others
    Milimani HCCC 2255 of 2000 [2002] 1 EA

    Considerations for granting leave to file appeal out of time

  • Machira t/a Machira Advocates vs East African Standard
    [2002] eKLR

    Suspension of a successful party's benefits only in exceptional circumstances

  • HGE vs SM
    [2020] eKLR

    Pre-requisites for stay of execution pending appeal

  • Shell Ltd vs Kibiru and Another
    [1986] KLR 410

    Substantial loss must be substantiated

  • Gianfraco Manenthi & Another vs Africa Merchant Assurance Co Limited
    [2019] eKLR

    Rationale for furnishing security

  • Francis Likhabila vs Barclays Bank of Kenya
    [2020] eKLR

    Appeal to High Court from magistrates' court instituted by Memorandum of Appeal

  • County Executive of Kisumu vs County Government of Kisumu & Others
    [2017] eKLR

    Principles guiding extension of time

  • Nicholas Kiptoo Arap Korir Salat vs IEBC & 7 Others
    Application No. 16 of 2014 [2014] eKLR

    Underlying principles for extension of time discretion

  • Abubaker Mohamed Al-Amin vs Firdaus Siwa Somo
    [2018] eKLR

    Interpretation of proviso to Section 79G; appeal need not be filed before leave sought

  • Gerald M'limbine vs Joseph Kangangi
    [2009] eKLR

    First school of thought - appeal must first be filed out of time

  • GK Associates Limited & another vs National Bank of Kenya Limited
    [2017] eKLR

    First school of thought on Section 79G proviso

  • Amri Mchoro Mwamuri vs Indian Ocean Beach Club
    [2018] eKLR

    First school of thought on Section 79G proviso

  • Martha Wambui vs Irene Wanjiru Mwangi & another
    [2015] eKLR

    Second school of thought - 'admitted' covers appeals yet to be filed

  • Masoud M Y Noorani vs General Tyre Sales Limited
    [2014] eKLR

    Second school of thought on Section 79G proviso

  • Cusack vs Harrow London Borough Council
    [2013] 4 ALL ER 97

    Discerning legislative intention from words, context, aim and purpose

  • Charles Karanja Kiiru vs Charles Githinji Muigwa

    Appeal filed out of time without leave can be validated later

  • Geoffrey Maina Njuguna vs Waweru Ndirangu
    [2022] eKLR

    Section 79G admits both retrospective and prospective applications

  • Halai & Another vs Thornton & Turpin (1963) Ltd
    [1990] eKLR

    Three conditions for stay of execution

  • Butt vs Rent Restriction Tribunal
    [1982] KLR 417

    Discretionary principles for grant of stay

  • Rosalindi Wanjiku Macharia vs James Kiingati Kimani (Suing as the Legal Representative of the Estate of Martin Muiruri (Deceased))
    [2017] eKLR

    Existence of an appeal is a condition precedent to stay under Order 42 Rule 6

  • Waithera vs Kalakacha & Another
    (Miscellaneous Civil Application 484 of 2019) [2022] KEHC 10758 (KLR)

    Stay jurisdiction must be preceded by filing of a memorandum of appeal

On appeal from
Magistrates' Court
CM ELC No 993 of 2020
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 13(1) and 16A(2) of the Environment and Land Court Act, 2015 and the Civil Procedure Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Muthoki Brothers Company Limited v Masanga", Case Analysis (2023). Environment and Land Appeal E108 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/18498/eng@2023-05-11

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.