Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedEnvironment & Land Case E066 of 2022· [2023] KEELC 17804 (KLR)

Kamanthe v SBM Bank (K) Limited & another

Environment and Land Court
29 May 2023
2,066 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court allowed SBM Bank to proceed with auctioning a borrower's matrimonial land because she defaulted on a loan secured by a charge over it.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling by the Environment and Land Court at Machakos (CA Ochieng, J) on the Plaintiff's Notice of Motion dated August 23, 2022, seeking temporary injunctions restraining SBM Bank (K) Limited and Dalali Traders Auctioneers from auctioning Mavoko Town Block 3/30764 - her matrimonial home - and an order for a statement of account. The Plaintiff averred she took an asset loan in 2013 for two trucks through Magenex Investment Ltd, that the trucks were repossessed without default, and that the suit land was never collateral for the asset loan; she claimed to have repaid Kshs 10,000,000. The 1st Defendant, through its Assistant Manager Debt Recovery, deposed that the Plaintiff charged the suit land by a Legal Charge dated March 30, 2015 for Kshs 3,500,000 to secure a facility to Magenex Investment Ltd, that she was in arrears, that statutory notices under Section 90 of the Land Act and a Notification of Sale were issued, and that the statutory power of sale had crystallised. Applying Giella v Cassman Brown, the court found the Plaintiff covenanted to repay and permitted realisation of the security on default; account statements showed she remained in arrears; and she had not denied the earlier Magenex suit (Nairobi HCCC 583 of 2015) in which indebtedness was acknowledged but unpaid, leading to dismissal for want of prosecution. Holding that a charged matrimonial home becomes a commodity realisable on default, the court found no prima facie case and dismissed the application with costs on May 29, 2023.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the Plaintiff established a prima facie case with a probability of success for an interlocutory injunction

Holding

No prima facie case established; application dismissed

Reasoning

Applying Giella v Cassman Brown, the court examined the Charge Document of March 30, 2015 under which the Plaintiff covenanted to repay the loan and permitted realisation of security on default. Statements of account showed she remained in arrears. She had not denied the earlier suit by Magenex Investment Ltd challenging repossession, in which indebtedness was acknowledged but never settled, and which was dismissed for want of prosecution. Being in default, she could not resist realisation of the security.

02

Whether the statutory power of sale had crystallised and notices were duly issued

Holding

Yes; the power of sale had crystallised and requisite notices including the Notification of Sale were served

Reasoning

The court found the Plaintiff was served with the requisite statutory notices, including a redemption notice and Notification of Sale, and that nothing stood in the way of the 1st Defendant realising its security. The matrimonial-home character of the land was held irrelevant once the land was charged.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Once land is charged as security, its status as matrimonial property does not prevent a chargee from realising the security upon default
  • A borrower in default of contractual obligations under a Charge cannot complain when the chargee's statutory power of sale crystallises

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Notice of motion application dated August 23, 2022 dismissed with costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Land ActSection 90

Cases cited (6)

  • Giella v Cassman Brown Co. Ltd
    (1973) EA 358

    Principles for granting interlocutory injunctions

  • American Cynamid v Ethicon Limited
    (1975) AC 396

    Interlocutory injunction principles

  • Naftali Ruthi Kinyua v Thuita Gachure & another
    (2015) eKLR

    Restraint of sale risks debt outstripping property value

  • Giro Commercial Bank Limited v Halid Hamad Mutesi
    (2002) eKLR

    Similar proposition on chargee's realisation of security

  • Humphrey Kilambo Mcharo v Kenya Commercial Bank Ltd
    Civil Application No Nai 51 of 2005
  • Andrew Muriuki Wanjohi v Equity Building Society Ltd & 2 others
    [2006] eKLR

    Stoppage of sale results in continued growth of debt and irrecoverable loss

Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over land matters (interlocutory application in an ELC suit)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kamanthe v SBM Bank (K) Limited & another", Case Analysis (2023). Environment & Land Case E066 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/17804/eng@2023-05-29

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.