Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedEnvironment & Land Case E013 of 2021· [2023] KEELC 17646 (KLR)

Kenta v Njapit & 5 others

Environment and Land Court
25 May 2023
3,110 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court refused to order a land survey before trial, ruling that parties must first present their evidence in court.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling by the Environment and Land Court at Narok (Mbogo, J) determined a notice of motion dated 7th November 2022 filed by the 1st to 3rd defendants seeking an order directing the District Land Registrar and District Surveyor, Narok, to visit land parcel Cis-Mara/Oldonyorasha/169, ascertain its size and file a report pending the hearing of the suit. The plaintiff, the registered proprietor of the 62.45-hectare parcel, claimed the defendants had fraudulently hived off 20.23 hectares in the pretence that the land belonged to the defunct Oldonyo Rasha Group Ranch. The plaintiff opposed the application, arguing the supporting affidavit was defective because its jurat appeared on a separate page, that the applicants lacked locus to act for a dissolved group ranch, and that the court was being invited to sanitize illegality by directing the same officials he accused of fraud. The court framed two issues: the validity of the affidavit and whether the site visit should be ordered. On the first, following Burnaby Properties Limited v Suntra Stocks Limited, the court held the jurat defect was an irregularity of form, curable under Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution. On the second, relying on Beatrice Ngonyo Ndungu and Chira v Kenya Power, the court held that a site visit serves to receive evidence and the court should not become an investigation forum; since parties had not yet presented their case, the prayer was premature. The application was dismissed with costs to the plaintiff, and the matter was fixed for mention on 30th May 2023 for directions.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether a supporting affidavit with the jurat on a separate page is fatally defective

Holding

Not defective; it is an irregularity of form curable under Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution, which depreciates procedural technicalities in favour of substantive justice

Reasoning

Relying on Burnaby Properties Limited v Suntra Stocks Limited, the court held that a jurat on a separate page is not a defect going to jurisdiction but an irregularity of form. Article 159(2)(d) requires courts not to pay undue regard to procedural technicalities. The affidavit was therefore proper for all intents and purposes and the prayer to strike it out failed.

p. 5
02

Whether the court should order a site visit and report by the Land Registrar and Surveyor before trial

Holding

Refused at the interlocutory stage; parties must first present their case, and any site visit or report may be ordered in the course of trial if needed

Reasoning

Citing Beatrice Ngonyo Ndungu and Chira v Kenya Power, the court noted that site visits serve to receive evidence, and a party who has not adduced evidence cannot invite the court to investigate. Ownership was not disputed and the size appears on the title. Since parties were yet to present their case, ordering a visit then would be premature.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • A jurat appearing on a separate page from the averments is an irregularity of form, not substance, and is curable under Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution
  • A court will not order a site visit or investigation before parties have presented their case; the court shall not be converted into an investigation forum

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The notice of motion application dated 7th November, 2022 is dismissed with costs to the plaintiff/respondent
  2. 2.Matter fixed for mention on 30th May, 2023 for directions to enable parties fix a date for hearing

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1A, 1B, 3A
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 51 Rule 1
  • Oaths and Statutory Declarations ActSections 5, 8
  • Land (Group Representatives) ActSections 13-21
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 159(2)(d)
  • Land Registration ActSection 16

Cases cited (10)

  • Kangithi Posta & Another v David Ndwiga Njagi & 2 Others
    [2018] eKLR

    Relied on by applicants to support the utility of a site visit report

  • Supermarine Handling Services Limited v Kenya Revenue Authority
    Civil Appeal no 85 of 2006 [2010] eKLR

    Costs should consider conduct of parties and circumstances of filing

  • Wambui v Mwangi & 3 Others
    (Civil Appeal 465 of 2019) 2021 KESA 144 (KLR)

    Court cannot be made an instrument to sanitize an illegality

  • Kawaljeet Singh Rekhi v Peter Wainaina Kamau & 2 Others
    [2016] eKLR

    Court should not aid illegality

  • Fredrick Mwangi Nyaga v Garam Investments & Another
    [2013] eKLR

    Affidavit with jurat on separate page is defective

  • Galaxy Paintis Co. Limited v Falcon Guards Limited
    Civil Appeal no 219 of 1998

    An affidavit cannot be amended; only striking out or withdrawal

  • Dennis Ololoigero & 2 Others v The Art of Ventures Limited & 2 Others
    [2006] eKLR

    A dissolved group has no life; former representatives' actions are voidable

  • Burnaby Properties Limited v Suntra Stocks Limited
    [2015] eKLR

    Jurat on separate page is an irregularity of form, not substance

  • Beatrice Ngonyo Ndungu & another v Samuel K. Kanyoro & 2 others
    [2017] eKLR

    Site visit only for receiving evidence; burden of proof lies on he who alleges

  • Chira & 2 others v Kenya Power & Lighting Company Limited
    (Environment & Land Case 94 of 2019) [2022] KEELC 2519 (KLR)

    Special circumstances required before visitation to locus in quo; court not an investigation forum

Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court over disputes relating to land; application brought under Sections 1A, 1B, 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Kenta v Njapit & 5 others", Case Analysis (2023). Environment & Land Case E013 of 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/17646/eng@2023-05-25

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.