Asunda v Ongoma & another
The bottom line
#A Kenyan court confirmed that lawyers cannot drop a client by filing an amended memorandum of appearance; they must follow the formal Order 9 procedure.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Whether an advocate may cease acting for a party by filing an amended memorandum of appearance
No. Once appearance is entered, the advocate remains on record until a formal application under Order 9 Rule 13(1) is made, granted, and the order served; the amended memorandum was expunged.
Order 9 Rule 13(1) requires an advocate who has acted for a party to apply by summons in chambers for an order that he has ceased to act, serve the order on every party, enter it in court and file a certificate of service. Until then the advocate is considered the advocate of the party to final conclusion of the cause. A memorandum of appearance is not a pleading capable of amendment, per Kanti and Active Partners. Filing an amended memorandum left the 2nd defendant exposed to prejudicial orders without her knowledge.
Legal principles established
#- An advocate who has entered appearance for a party can only cease acting through a formal application under Order 9 Rule 13(1), with the resulting order served on the party and other parties; an amended memorandum of appearance cannot effect this.
Court orders
#- 1.The memorandum of appearance dated November 22, 2021 and filed on the same date is expunged from the record
- 2.The firm of F Omondi & Company Advocates shall within 14 days from the date of the ruling file and serve an application to cease acting for the 2nd Defendant
- 3.No orders as to costs
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Environment and Land Court jurisdiction over land matters; procedural ruling under Order 9 of the Civil Procedure Rules
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Later judgments citing this (1)
#Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.
- Nafwa v Barasa (Environment and Land Case 56 of 2017) [2026] KEELC 1178 (KLR)[2026] KEELC 1178 (KLR)26 Feb 2026applied
Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Asunda v Ongoma & another", Case Analysis (2023). Environment & Land Case E22 of 2021. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/17183/eng@2023-04-27
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.