Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedEnvironment & Land Case 37 of 2022· [2023] KEELC 16904 (KLR)

Benson Losialima Lokere & another (Suing as Executors of the Will of Lokoriongor Lokore) v Julius Tong'okwang & 2 others

Environment and Land Court
20 April 2023
3,538 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~14 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

Kenya's Environment and Land Court confirmed that executors named in a will can sue to protect estate land without first obtaining probate.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The Plaintiffs, suing as executors of the will of the late Lokoriongor Lokere, filed suit in December 2022 alleging trespass onto their late father's share in Kanyarkwat Group Ranch, West Pokot, and sought general damages and an injunction. The 1st Defendant filed a preliminary objection contending that the Plaintiffs, having obtained no grant of probate over the purported will, lacked locus standi and the suit was incompetent and should be struck out. The 2nd Defendant supported the objection. The Defendants relied on Mukisa Biscuit on the nature of preliminary objections, and on authorities including Musa Tapem, Caleb Imbuye and Hawa Shanko, arguing that without a grant no one may deal with a deceased's property. The Plaintiffs relied on Section 80 of the Law of Succession Act and on Bentley-Buckle and Osman Tahir Sheikh Said, contending that an executor derives title from the will itself and may sue before probate. The court framed two issues: locus standi and costs. It distinguished the Defendants' authorities as concerning intestate estates, interpreted Section 80(1) as validating a will and the executor's acts from the date of death, and adopted the Kothari v Qureshi proposition that an executor represents the estate from death. It held probate was not a precondition to suit and dismissed the preliminary objection with costs to the Plaintiffs, maintaining the interim injunction and directing a virtual mention for further directions.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether executors of a will must obtain probate before instituting a suit on behalf of the estate

Holding

No - an executor's title derives from the will itself, and Section 80(1) of the Law of Succession Act validates the will and the executor's acts from the date of death

Reasoning

The court distinguished the defendants' authorities, which concerned intestacy, and applied Section 80 of the Law of Succession Act. Subsection (1) validates the will and the executor's intermediate acts from the date of death, whereas subsection (2) applies to administrators of intestate estates. Relying on Bentley-Buckle and Osman Tahir Sheikh Said, the court held executors may sue before probate.

p. 3
02

Whether the preliminary objection was a pure point of law

Holding

The court treated it as a point of law but found it unmeritorious on the succession law analysis

Reasoning

The court restated the Mukisa Biscuit definition of a preliminary objection and cautioned that such objections must not depend on contested facts or evidence. It then proceeded to interpret Sections 54, 67 and 80 of the Law of Succession Act and paragraph 14 of the 5th Schedule, concluding the objection was baseless.

p. 6

Legal principles established

#
  • An executor named in a will derives authority from the will itself and may sue on behalf of the estate before obtaining a grant of probate

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Preliminary Objection by the Defendants is dismissed with costs to the Plaintiffs
  2. 2.The suit to be mentioned virtually on May 8, 2023 for further directions
  3. 3.The interim orders of injunction granted on December 20, 2022 remain in force until the mention date

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Law of Succession ActSection 54
  • Law of Succession ActSection 67
  • Law of Succession ActSection 80(1) and (2)
  • Law of Succession ActParagraph 14 of the 5th Schedule

Cases cited (12)

  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd v West End Distributors Ltd
    (1969) EA 696

    Definition of a preliminary objection as a pure point of law

  • Musa Tapem v Samson Ariworeng
    Kitale ELC No 100 of 2015

    Locus standi based on letters of administration or grant of probate

  • Caleb Imbuye v Nangabo Cooperative Society
    Kitale ELC No 22 (E018) of 2021

    Suit struck out for want of letters of administration

  • Hawa Shanko v Mohammed Uta Shanko
    (2018) eKLR

    Without a grant, no one can deal with property of a deceased person

  • MaFoy v United Africa Co. Ltd
    (1961) 23 All ER 1169

    An act done without authority is a nullity, incurably bad

  • Julian Adogo Onguga v Francis Kiberenge Aboro
    Civil Appeal No 119/2015

    Locus standi is cardinal in any matter

  • Grace Mwenda Munjuri v Trustees of the Agricultural Society of Kenya
    [2017] eKLR

    Preliminary objections containing contested matters are vague

  • Bashir Haji Abdullahi v Adan Mohammed Noor & 3 others
    [2004] eKLR

    Preliminary objections must be sufficiently particularised

  • Susan Wairimu Ndiangui v Pauline W. Thuo & Another
    [2005] eKLR

    Preliminary objection should not be vague and must disclose the point of law

  • Nicholas William Bentley-Buckle & another v Custody Registrars Services Limited
    [2016] eKLR

    Executor may sue before filing succession proceedings for probate

  • Osman Tahir Sheikh Said & another v Nomad Energy Limited
    [2019] eKLR

    Executors may file proceedings to protect estate property before grant of probate

  • Kothari v Qureshi
    1967 EA 564

    Executor represents estate from date of testator's death

Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court under the Environment and Land Court Act over land in West Pokot

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Benson Losialima Lokere & another (Suing as Executors of the Will of Lokoriongor Lokore) v Julius Tong'okwang & 2 others", Case Analysis (2023). Environment & Land Case 37 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/16904/eng@2023-04-20

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.