Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedEnvironment & Land Case 767 of 2017· [2023] KEELC 16424 (KLR)

Iraki & another v Ndung'u & another

Environment and Land Court
16 March 2023
1,902 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~8 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan land suit collapsed because the family waited over a year after the plaintiff's death to substitute him, so the court struck out the entire case.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
The 2nd Defendant, sued as legal representative of the late Lilian Wairimu Ngaruiya, moved under sections 1A, 1B and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 2 rule 15(1) of the Civil Procedure Rules to strike out the entire suit as pleaded in the amended plaint, contending that the 2nd Plaintiff, the registered proprietor of the suit land L.R No. Karai/gikambura/482, died on 13/4/2021 and, no substitution having been sought within one year, the suit abated on 14/4/2022; further, that the 1st Plaintiff lacked locus standi and the plaint disclosed no cause of action. The 1st Plaintiff, the deceased's wife, opposed, asserting beneficial and matrimonial rights over the land and alternatively seeking extension of time to substitute the 2nd Plaintiff, claiming to hold a limited grant ad litem. The court framed a single issue: whether the application was merited. Applying Order 24 rules 1, 2, 3 and 5, it held the suit had abated by operation of law, no substitution application having been made within one year of the proven death. The 1st Plaintiff's claim of beneficial rights was unsupported by evidence and contradicted by the green card showing registration and subsequent transfers during the 2nd Plaintiff's lifetime; her plea that the 2nd Plaintiff was 'currently ailing' was untrue and misleading. The claimed limited grant was not exhibited, and substitution could only follow revival of the abated suit. The application was allowed with costs to the 2nd Defendant, and the suit was struck out.

Key legal issues

#
01

Abatement of suit on death of a plaintiff without substitution within one year

Holding

The 2nd Plaintiff's suit abated by operation of law as no substitution application was made within one year of his death on 13/4/2021

Reasoning

Order 24 rules 1, 2, 3 and 5 govern abatement. Death on 13/4/2021 was proven by death certificate and conceded by the 1st Plaintiff. No application for substitution was made within one year, so the suit abated as against the deceased plaintiff on 14/4/2022.

02

Whether the cause of action survived to the 1st Plaintiff as spouse with beneficial/matrimonial rights

Holding

It did not; her claim of beneficial rights was unsupported by evidence and contradicted by the green card showing registration and transfers during the 2nd Plaintiff's lifetime

Reasoning

The 1st Plaintiff's averment of building a matrimonial home in 1992 was unsupported and refuted by the green card showing the 2nd Plaintiff was registered on 27/5/1996 by transmission, later transferring to the 1st Defendant and then the 2nd Defendant, all in his lifetime. Her pleaded claim that the 2nd Plaintiff was 'currently ailing' was untrue and misleading given his proven death.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Where no application for substitution of a deceased plaintiff is made within one year, the suit abates so far as the deceased plaintiff is concerned

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The 2nd Defendant's application dated 28/9/2022 allowed
  2. 2.The entire suit as contained in the amended plaint struck out
  3. 3.Costs to the 2nd Defendant/Applicant

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Actsections 1A, 1B, 3A
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 2 rule 15(1); Order 24 rules 1, 2, 3, 5, 7
  • Law Reform Actsection 2(1)

Cases cited (6)

  • Trouistik Union International & Anor vs Jane Mbeyu (2008)

    Meaning of locus standi

  • Alfred Njau & Others Vs City Council of Nairobi (1982-88)

    Meaning of locus standi

  • Beatrice Wambui Kiarie vs Beatrice Wambui Kiarie (sic) & 9 Others [2018] eKLR
    [2018] eKLR

    Source of locus standi authorities

  • Karl Wehner Claasen Vs Commissioner of Lands & 4 Others [2019] eKLR
    [2019] eKLR

    Cited by 1st Plaintiff on abatement/survival of cause of action

  • Khelef Khalifa El-Busaidy Vs Commissioner of Lands & 2 others [2002] eKLR
    [2002] eKLR

    Cited by 1st Plaintiff on abatement/survival of cause of action

  • Attorney General & Another Vs Andrew Maina Githinji & Another [2016] eKLR
    [2016] eKLR

    Definition of cause of action per Waki JA

Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 1A, 1B and 3A Civil Procedure Act and Order 2 rule 15(1) Civil Procedure Rules

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Iraki & another v Ndung'u & another", Case Analysis (2023). Environment & Land Case 767 of 2017. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/16424/eng@2023-03-16

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.