Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCPartially AllowedEnvironment & Land Case 46 of 2022· [2023] KEELC 16216 (KLR)

Murage (Suing as the administrator of the Estate of Bernard Chiori) v Land Registrar, Kilifi County & another; KCB Bank Kenya Limited (Interested Party)

Environment and Land Court
9 March 2023
2,707 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~11 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling by M.A. Odeny J of the Environment and Land Court at Malindi on a notice of motion dated August 3, 2022 by Joseph Nicholas Murage, administrator of the estate of Bernard Chiori Murage, the registered proprietor of Land Reference Number Chembe/Kibabamshe/393 since 1978. The applicant sought interim orders restraining the Land Registrar from cancelling his title or interfering with the register, restraining the 2nd defendant from selling or interfering with the property, production of the green card, and registration of a certificate of confirmation of grant issued in Nairobi High Court Succession Cause No 438 of 1988. The 2nd defendant opposed on grounds of res judicata, relying on a declaratory judgment in Malindi ELC No 30 of 2011 in which he was declared a bona fide purchaser; the applicant was not a party to that suit. The 1st defendant's registrar confirmed the land was registered to the deceased with charges as encumbrances. The court framed one issue: whether the applicant met the threshold for interlocutory orders. Applying Giella v Cassman Brown, it found a prima facie case corroborated by the land registrar, and held that the absence of replying affidavits left the applicant's averments unchallenged and taken as true, citing Odiyo, Biwott and Haidara. The court issued a temporary injunction restraining both defendants from interfering with the suit land pending trial, reserved the remaining orders for trial, and awarded costs in the cause.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the applicant established a prima facie case for interlocutory injunction

Holding

Yes - the land registrar's replying affidavit corroborated that the suit land is registered in the name of the applicant's deceased father, and the applicant holds a confirmed grant transmitting the land to him

Reasoning

The court applied the Giella v Cassman Brown test. The applicant demonstrated registration of the suit land in his deceased father's name and his own status as administrator with a confirmed grant. The land registrar, custodian of land records, confirmed the registration, fortifying the applicant's case. The Court of Appeal had also found the applicant's claims a new cause of action, supporting the suit's viability.

p. 4
02

Effect of failure to file replying affidavits

Holding

The factual averments in the supporting affidavit remain unchallenged and are taken as true

Reasoning

Apart from grounds of opposition by the 2nd defendant, no party filed a replying affidavit. Relying on Odiyo, Biwott and Haidara, the court held grounds of opposition address only issues of law and do not rebut sworn factual averments, so the applicant's averments stood unrebutted and were accepted as true.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Unchallenged averments in a supporting affidavit, where no replying affidavit is filed, are taken to be true
  • A prima facie case is a genuine and arguable case showing an apparently infringed right calling for rebuttal

Court orders

#
  1. 1.A temporary injunction restraining the 1st and 2nd defendants from interfering with the suit land pending the hearing and determination of the suit
  2. 2.The other orders sought shall be determined during the trial of the suit
  3. 3.Costs in the cause

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010Order 40(1)(a) and (b)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 21 [1]

Cases cited (9)

  • John Florence Maritime Services Ltd & another v Cabinet Secretary, Transport and Infrastructure & 3 others
    [2021] eKLR

    Matter not res judicata where plaintiff was not a party to the prior suit

  • Philip Kairu Kahura v Embakasi Ranching & Co Ltd & 3 others
    [2017] eKLR

    Interlocutory injunction principles

  • Giella v Cassman Brown
    (1973) EA 358

    Conditions for grant of interlocutory injunction

  • Nguruman Ltd versus Jan Bonde Nielsen
    (2014) eKLR

    Interlocutory injunction principles

  • Moses C Muhia Njoroge & 2 others v Jane W Lesaloi and 5 others
    (2014) eKLR

    Definition of a prima facie case

  • Kennedy Otieno Odiyo & 12 others v Kenya Electricity Generating Company Limited
    [2010] eKLR

    Grounds of opposition address only issues of law; unrebutted averments taken as true

  • Kipyator Nicholas Kiprono Biwott v George Mbuguss and Kalamka Ltd
    Civil Case No 2143 of 1999

    Consequences of failing to file a replying affidavit

  • Mohammed & another v Haidara
    [1972] EA 166

    A replying affidavit was essential to deny allegations

  • Joseph N Murage (As the Administrator of the Estate of Bernard Chiori Murage) v Softwhite Beach Limited
    [2022] KECA 803 (KLR)

    Appellant was not a party to the ELC; his claims are a new cause of action

Jurisdiction invoked
Environment and Land Court jurisdiction over land disputes (Environment and Land Court Act); interlocutory relief under Order 40(1)(a) and (b) of the Civil Procedure Rules 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Later judgments citing this (1)

#

Judgments in the corpus that rely on this one. Where the Court said how it treated the authority, that is shown.

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Murage (Suing as the administrator of the Estate of Bernard Chiori) v Land Registrar, Kilifi County & another; KCB Bank Kenya Limited (Interested Party)", Case Analysis (2023). Environment & Land Case 46 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/16216/eng@2023-03-09

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.