Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCOtherEnvironment & Land Case E037 of 2022· [2023] KEELC 16160 (KLR)

Nzuki v African Banking Corporation Limited & 2 others

Environment and Land Court
1 March 2023
4,256 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~17 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court transferred a dispute over a charged matrimonial home to the High Court, ruling the real issue was commercial, not land ownership.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Machakos (A. Nyukuri, J) dealt with the plaintiff's Notice of Motion dated 20 May 2022 seeking a temporary injunction restraining the 1st and 2nd Defendants from auctioning or dealing with Title No. Mavoko Town Block 3/2141, and a Preliminary Objection dated 15 July 2022 by the 1st and 2nd Defendants challenging the court's jurisdiction. The plaintiff, wife of the 3rd Defendant (the registered owner and chargor), alleged the property was her matrimonial home, that her grandfather had directed its transfer to the 3rd Defendant in trust, and that the charge securing a credit facility to Plaza Magnetic Resonance Imaging Limited was created without her spousal consent, contrary to Sections 79(3) and 90(3)(c) of the Land Act and the Matrimonial Property Act. The bank asserted a valid charge registered in 2013, statutory notices issued, default of over Kshs 57 million, and a spousal consent executed by one Jackline Kishagha Mnjala; it also contended the suit was sub judice given Machakos HCCC No. 7 of 2022 filed by the 3rd Defendant. The court framed two issues: jurisdiction and the injunction threshold. Applying the predominant purpose test (Suzanne Butler vs Redhill Investments), it held that although the Land Act defines 'court' as the ELC, the predominant issues - validity of the charge for want of spousal consent and the chargor's covenants - were commercial, ownership being undisputed. The court ordered the matter transferred to the High Court at Machakos. The injunction application was not determined on its merits and no costs order was made.

Key legal issues

#
01

Jurisdiction of the ELC over disputes concerning charges over land

Holding

The Land Act defines 'court' as the ELC, so the ELC has jurisdiction over matters touching on charges, but where the predominant issue is commercial, the High Court is the proper forum.

Reasoning

The court noted that the Land Act, which governs charges, defines the court as the ELC, giving it jurisdiction over charge disputes. However, since charge disputes also involve lending and borrowing (commercial matters) and may touch matrimonial issues, the predominant purpose test applies. Here, ownership was undisputed; the real issues were spousal consent to the charge and the chargor's covenants, which are predominantly commercial, so the High Court should hear the matter.

p. 8
02

Whether the Applicant met the threshold for temporary injunction

Holding

Not determined; the matter was transferred before the injunction application was decided on its merits.

Reasoning

Although the second framed issue was the injunction threshold, the court resolved the jurisdictional question first and ordered transfer to the High Court, leaving the injunction application to be determined there. No findings were made on prima facie case, irreparable harm or balance of convenience.

p. 8

Legal principles established

#
  • Where a dispute involves both land and commercial elements, the predominant purpose test determines whether the ELC or the High Court has jurisdiction.
  • Jurisdiction flows from the Constitution or statute and cannot be conferred by judicial craft.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.This matter be and is hereby transferred to the High Court sitting at Machakos for hearing and determination.

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 162(2)(b)
  • Constitution of KenyaArticle 40
  • Environment and Land Court ActSection 13
  • Land ActSections 2, 79(3), 90(3)(c), 96(2)(3), 104, 106, Part VII
  • Matrimonial Property ActSections 7, 12(1) and (5)
  • Matrimonial Property RulesRule 6
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 40 Rule 1(a) and (b)

Cases cited (14)

  • Giella vs Cassman Brown & Company Limited
    [1973] EA 358

    Threshold for temporary injunction

  • Mrao Ltd vs. First American Bank of Kenya & 2 Others
    [2003] KLR 125

    Definition of prima facie case

  • Elizabeth Gachambi vs. Grace Nduta Kinuthia & Another
    [2017] eKLR

    Affidavit is not proof of marriage; chargor must verify spousal relationship

  • P. A. vs. Stima Sacco Society Limited & 2 Others
    (Civil Case 199 of 2018) [2022] eKLR

    Affidavit is not proof of marriage; chargor must verify spousal relationship

  • Joseph Siro Mosioma vs. Housing Finance Company of Kenya & 3 Others
    [2008]

    Damages cannot be a substitute for loss of a home

  • Stella Kavutha Muthoka & Another vs. Kenya Women Microfinance Bank Ltd
    [2021] eKLR

    Where predominant issue is a charge, High Court has jurisdiction

  • Republic vs. Paul Kihara Kariuki and Attorney General & 2 Others (Ex Parte Law Society of Kenya
    [2020] eKLR

    Sub judice doctrine

  • Blasovilla Holdings Kenya Limited vs. Foton East Africa Limited
    [2014] eKLR

    Secured creditor's priority over third-party interests

  • City Council of Nairobi vs. Wilfred Kamau Githua t/a Githua Associates & Another

    Cannot seek relief from a contract one was not party to

  • Republic vs. Karisa Chengo & 2 Others
    [2017] eKLR

    Jurisdiction of courts is defined by law

  • Cooperative Bank of Kenya Limited vs.
    [2017] eKLR

    Jurisdiction on charge disputes

  • Diamond Trust Bank Kenya Ltd vs. Fatma Hassan Hadi

    Chargee/chargor relationship is about repayment, not land use

  • Samuel Kamau Macharia & Another vs. Kenya Commercial Bank & Another
    [2012] eKLR

    Jurisdiction flows from Constitution or statute, not judicial innovation

  • Suzanne Butler & 4 Others vs. Redhill Investments & Another
    [2017] eKLR

    Predominant purpose test for ELC vs High Court jurisdiction

Jurisdiction invoked
Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution and Section 13 of the Environment and Land Court Act

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Nzuki v African Banking Corporation Limited & 2 others", Case Analysis (2023). Environment & Land Case E037 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/16160/eng@2023-03-01

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.