Onunda & another v Rabita; Rabita (Substitute) (Environment and Land Appeal 19 of 2022) [2023] KEELC 891 (KLR)
The bottom line
#A Homabay court gave an appellant more time to substitute a respondent but struck out other prayers as abandoned, showing courts reward diligence in civil procedure.
What this practically means
#Executive summary
#Key legal issues
#Extension of time under the Environment and Land Court Act and the Civil Procedure Act
Extension of time granted to meet the ends of justice, following Nicholas Kiptoo Korir Salat v IEBC and 7 others
Counsel for the appellant sought extension of time in prayer 2 of the Notice of Motion. The court, invoking its inherent and statutory powers under section 3 of the Environment and Land Court Act (2015) and sections 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, allowed the prayer, citing Nicholas Kiptoo Korir Salat v IEBC and 7 others (2017) eKLR as authority for liberally granting such relief in the interest of justice.
Abandonment of prayers for transfer and substitution
Prayers 4 and 5 of the Notice of Motion marked as abandoned
Upon hearing counsel for the respective parties, the court marked prayers 4 and 5 (transfer of the matter and substitution of the respondent) as abandoned. However, because prayer 2 for extension of time was allowed, the appellant's counsel was still accorded 14 days to file and serve a fresh application for substitution of the respondent.
Legal principles established
#- The court may grant extension of time to meet the ends of justice under section 3 of the Environment and Land Court Act and sections 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act
Court orders
#- 1.Prayers 4 and 5 of the Notice of Motion dated July 16, 2022, for transfer of the matter and substitution of the respondent, marked as abandoned
- 2.Prayer 2 of the Notice of Motion for extension of time allowed
- 3.Appellant's counsel given 14 days from January 18, 2023 to file and serve an application for substitution of the respondent
- 4.Mention on February 21, 2023
- Jurisdiction invoked
- Section 3 of the Environment and Land Court Act (2015) and sections 3 and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act Chapter 21 Laws of Kenya
Key timeline
#Practical implications
#Frequently asked questions
#Cite this brief
#Cite this brief
Caselaw, "Onunda & another v Rabita; Rabita (Substitute) (Environment and Land Appeal 19 of 2022) [2023] KEELC 891 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Not stated in the judgment. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/891/eng@2023-01-18
Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.