Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedELC E014 of 2022· [2023] KEELC 792 (KLR)

Faza Properties Limited v Mohamed & another; Mwea Rice Mills Limited & another (Interested Parties) (Environment & Land Case E014 of 2022) [2023] KEELC 792 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
14 February 2023
1,659 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~7 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court refused to merge two land-related lawsuits, ruling that shared parties and property alone don't justify consolidation.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
By a Notice of Motion dated 29 June 2022, the 2nd Interested Party (through CS Kennedy Ochieng) sought transfer of Milimani CMCC No E1174 of 2021 (Abdirahman Sheikh Mohammed v Murage Real Estate Limited & Mwea Rice Mills Limited) to the Environment and Land Court at Nairobi for consolidation with ELC E014 of 2022 (Faza Properties Limited v Hassan Hussein Mohammed & others), invoking Order 11 and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Sections 1A, 1B, 3A and 18(1)(b) of the Civil Procedure Act. The applicant argued both suits arose from a crossclaim by alleged tenants over LR No 209/590, that parties, counsel and witnesses overlapped, and consolidation would save costs and expedite hearings. The plaintiff opposed, submitting the suits involved different causes of action (trespass and permanent injunction in the ELC suit versus breach of contract and refund in the CMCC suit) and different parties, and that consolidation would prejudice fair hearing rights. The 1st defendant filed grounds of opposition and a replying affidavit calling the application an abuse of process. Applying the principles in Nyati Security Guards and Stumberg v Potgeiter, Mogeni J found that although the suits concerned the same subject matter and shared some parties, the claimants, causes of action and reliefs differed, and Faza Properties Limited and Hassan Hussein Mohammed were not parties to the CMCC suit and would be condemned unheard. The application was dismissed with no orders as to costs on 14 February 2023.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the two suits qualify for consolidation

Holding

They do not: the claimants and causes of action differ, the reliefs differ, and consolidation would condemn parties who are not in the magistrate's suit unheard

Reasoning

The court compared the two suits against the Nyati Security and Stumberg principles. While the subject matter (LR No 209/590) overlaps and some parties are common, the claimants and causes of action differ - one suit sounds in trespass, the other in breach of contract. Faza Properties Limited and Hassan Hussein Mohammed are not parties to the CMCC matter, so consolidation would condemn them unheard.

p. 3
02

Whether prejudice would arise from hearing the suits separately

Holding

No prejudice would be occasioned to the applicant if the suits proceed separately in their respective courts

Reasoning

The court concluded that hearing the suits separately in the courts where they were filed occasions no prejudice to the applicant, since the applicant can pursue its claim in the magistrates' court without consolidation.

p. 4

Legal principles established

#
  • Consolidation of suits is warranted where there are common questions of law or fact of sufficient importance, or where reliefs arise out of the same transaction, or where it is otherwise desirable
  • The fact that parties are the same in two suits is not of itself sufficient reason to transfer and consolidate them

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Dismissal of the Notice of Motion dated June 29, 2022
  2. 2.No orders as to costs

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSections 1A, 1B, 3A, 18(1)(b)
  • Civil Procedure Rules, 2010Order 11, Order 51 Rule 1

Cases cited (4)

  • Nyati Security Guards & Services Ltd v Municipal Council of Mombasa
    [2004] eKLR
  • Stumberg & another v Potgeiter
    [1970] EA 323
  • Prem Lala Nahata & another v Chandi Prasad Sikaria
    (2007) 2 Supreme Court Cases 551
  • BRIJ Kishore v Bir Singh & others
    LR 5922 of 2013
Jurisdiction invoked
Sections 1A, 1B, 3A and 18(1)(b) of the Civil Procedure Act, Cap 21 and Order 11 and Order 51 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Faza Properties Limited v Mohamed & another; Mwea Rice Mills Limited & another (Interested Parties) (Environment & Land Case E014 of 2022) [2023] KEELC 792 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). ELC E014 of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/792/eng@2023-02-14

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.