Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCAllowedMisc Application No 7B of 2022· [2023] KEELC 732 (KLR)

Oanya & another v Onywere (Suing as Personal Representative and Administrator of the Estate of Aloys Machini Nyangeri) (Miscellaneous Application 7B of 2022) [2023] KEELC 732 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
15 February 2023
955 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~4 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

A Kenyan court gave landowners 18 extra days' grace to appeal, but made them pay the costs for being late.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This was a ruling on a notice of motion dated 26 August 2022 by Callen Kwamboka Oanya and a co-applicant seeking leave to appeal out of time against the judgment of the magistrates' court in Kisii CMCC/ELC No. 155 of 2019, delivered 6 July 2022, and a stay of execution. The applicants, sued as 2nd and 3rd defendants, explained their failure to file an appeal in time on the indisposition of their erstwhile counsel, which left them unaware of the proceedings. The respondent opposed, contending their counsel actively participated and that the application was designed to deny her the fruits of her judgment. The court, applying section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act, found the delay of about 18 days short and, giving the applicants the benefit of the doubt, allowed the extension and directed filing and service of the memorandum of appeal within seven days. Considering the underlying suit - in which the respondent claimed that land belonging to the estate of Aloys Machini Nyangeri was transferred without succession and ultimately subdivided to the applicants - the court also granted a stay of execution, holding that execution would render the intended appeal nugatory. Costs of the application were awarded to the respondent because the applicants were responsible for the late filing. The application was allowed with costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Extension of time to appeal under section 79G Civil Procedure Act

Holding

Leave to appeal out of time granted despite the delay of about 18 days, on benefit of doubt, given the promptness of the application

Reasoning

The court set out section 79G, computed the delay (judgment 6 July 2022; application filed 26 August 2022, about 18 days late), noted the disputed explanation of counsel's indisposition, and weighed the short delay and promptness of the application in the applicants' favour.

p. 2
02

Stay of execution pending appeal

Holding

Stay granted because execution would render the intended appeal nugatory

Reasoning

The court noted the substantive suit concerned land claimed to belong to a deceased's estate, transferred without succession, and that the judgment directed the parcels to revert. If executed before the appeal was heard, the appeal would be rendered nugatory, justifying a stay pending appeal.

p. 2
03

Costs of the application

Holding

Applicants to bear costs because they were late

Reasoning

Although the extension was granted, the court held that since the applicants were the ones who filed the appeal late, they must shoulder the costs of the application notwithstanding the indulgence granted.

p. 2

Legal principles established

#
  • An appeal from a subordinate court should be filed within 30 days, but the court may admit an appeal out of time on good and sufficient cause, and a prompt application will favour the exercise of that discretion.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.Leave granted to the applicants to file an appeal out of time
  2. 2.Applicants to file and serve their memorandum of appeal within seven (7) days
  3. 3.Date to be given for directions and hearing of the appeal
  4. 4.Stay of execution of the judgment pending the hearing of the appeal
  5. 5.Applicants to bear the costs of the application

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure Actsection 79G
Jurisdiction invoked
Section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act, cap 21 (application for leave to file appeal out of time)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Oanya & another v Onywere (Suing as Personal Representative and Administrator of the Estate of Aloys Machini Nyangeri) (Miscellaneous Application 7B of 2022) [2023] KEELC 732 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Misc Application No 7B of 2022. Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/732/eng@2023-02-15

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.