Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
AI-generated case brief
Case Brief · caselaw.co.ke
ELCDismissedNot stated in judgment (Application dated September 16, 2022)· [2023] KEELC 648 (KLR)

Mulwa & 21 others v Munyae & 10 others & another (Environment & Land Case 158 of 2017) [2023] KEELC 648 (KLR)

Environment and Land Court
13 February 2023
3,040 words in judgment
View original judgmentRead on Kenya Law Watch case
AI-assisted case brief
·~12 min to read original · ~4 min brief

The bottom line

#

The Environment and Land Court in Machakos refused 164 land buyers' bid to join an ongoing case, ruling the issue had already been decided.

What this practically means

#

Executive summary

#
This is a ruling of the Environment and Land Court at Machakos (Ochieng J) on a Notice of Motion dated September 16, 2022 in which the 1st to 164th intended defendants sought to be joined as defendants in a long-running land suit concerning LR 1849 measuring 2,882 acres, in which the Plaintiffs claim that the original 32 members of Ngunga farm are tenants in common entitled to equal shares not exceeding 80 acres, and seek a mandatory injunction compelling excision of excess portions. The Applicants, purchasers of portions of the suit land from the 1960s onwards, claimed to be innocent purchasers for value in occupation whose rights would be violated if the suit was determined without them. The Plaintiffs opposed, arguing the application was res judicata since a materially identical application dated August 23, 2017 had been dismissed by Angote J on January 25, 2019 for want of written authority under Order 1 Rule 13, and that the Applicants were not necessary parties whose remedies lay against their vendors. The court framed two issues: res judicata and joinder. Holding that Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act applies to applications and that Angote J had dealt with the joinder question on its merits, the court found the fresh application res judicata and rejected the argument that the now-filed written authority cured the defect. On joinder, applying Order 1 Rule 10(2) and the Deported Asians Custodian Board v Jafier Brothers Ltd principles, the court held the Applicants did not meet the necessary-party criteria since their remedies lay against their vendors, not the Plaintiffs. The application was dismissed with costs.

Key legal issues

#
01

Whether the joinder application is res judicata

Holding

Yes - the same joinder question was heard and finally decided by Justice Angote on January 25, 2019, between the same parties.

Reasoning

Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act bars re-trying a matter directly and substantially in issue in a former suit between the same parties that was heard and finally decided. The prior application dated August 23, 2017 sought the same joinder orders and was dismissed. The doctrine applies to applications as well. The Applicants' contention that they have now filed the written authority earlier found lacking cannot allow them to circumvent the law; Justice Angote actually dealt with the joinder issue before dismissing.

p. 4
02

Whether the Applicants should be joined as Defendants

Holding

No - their presence is not necessary for the court to effectually and completely adjudicate on the suit.

Reasoning

Applying Order 1 Rule 10(2) and the principles in Deported Asians Custodian Board v Jafier Brothers Ltd, the court found the Applicants bought from parties who are not Plaintiffs, some purchased during the pendency of the suit, and their proper remedy lies against their respective vendors. The dispute's fulcrum concerns the original 32 members of Ngunga farm and reliefs against the existing Defendants, not the Applicants.

p. 5

Legal principles established

#
  • Section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act on res judicata applies to interlocutory applications as well as suits; a joinder application whose subject matter was already heard and finally decided in a former application between the same parties cannot be re-litigated.
  • For a person to be joined as a defendant, it must be shown either that the orders sought would legally affect their interests and joinder avoids multiplicity of suits, or that the defendant cannot effectually set up a defence without that person being joined.

Court orders

#
  1. 1.The Notice of Motion Application dated September 16, 2022 is dismissed
  2. 2.Costs of the application to the Plaintiffs (dismissed with costs)

Authorities

#

Legislation

  • Civil Procedure ActSection 7
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 1 Rule 10(1) and (2)
  • Civil Procedure RulesOrder 1 Rule 13(1) and (2)

Cases cited (22)

  • Invesco Assurance Company Limited & 2 others v Auctioneers Licensing Board & Another; Kinyanjui Njuguna & Company Advocates & Another (Interested Parties)
    (2020) eKLR
  • Cosmas Mrombo Moka v Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited & Another
    (2018) eKLR
  • Hezekia Kipkorir Maritim & 10 Others v Philip Kipkoech Tenai & 2 others
    (2016) eKLR
  • Civicon Limited v Kivuwatt Limited and 2 others
    (2015) eKLR
  • Jeremiah Wanyiri Wambugu v Geoffrey Wiagwa Wanjoya
    (2016) eKLR
  • Edward Muchiri (Suing as the Administrator to the Estate of Nelson Muchiri Githinji) v Christopher Njoroge Komu (being sued as the Administrator of the Estate of Komu Kiarie)
    (2021) eKLR
  • Falcon Global Logistics Co Limited v Management Committee of Eldama Ravine Boarding Primary School
    (2018) eKLR
  • Flectcher vs Peck
    10 US 87 (1810)
  • Lawrence Mukiri v Attorney General & 4 Others
    (2013) eKLR
  • Celina Muthoni Kithinji v Safiya Binti Swaleh & 8 Others
    (2018) eKLR
  • Francis Maina Njogu versus Nicolas Kiragu Ngacha and John Muchina Njogu Peter Muriuki Njogu Catherine Wanjiru
    Kerugoya ELC Case No 102 of 2014 eKLR
  • Departed Asians Property Custodian Board vs Jafier Brokers Ltd
    (1999) 1 EA 55
  • Co-operative Bank of Kenya Limited v Cosmas Mrombo Moka & Legacy Auctioneering Services
    [2019] eKLR
  • Gladys Nduku Nthuki v Letshego Kenya Limited; Mueni Charles Maingi (Intended Plaintiff)
    [2022] eKLR
  • Christopher Orina Kenyariri t/a Kenyariri & Associates Advocates v Salama Beach Hotel Limited & 3 others
    [2017] eKLR
  • ET v Attorney General & another
    [2012] eKLR
  • Gurbacham v Yowani Ekori
    [1958] EA 450
  • Amir Ahmed & 2 others v Katana Chai & 55 others; Kadzuhoni Primary School Board of Management–Kadzuhoni Primary School (Intended Defendants)
    [2021] eKLR
  • Izera Enterprises Limited v Image Font Limited; Sagalla Ranchers Limited (Interested Party)
    (Environment & Land Case 113 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 12585 (KLR) (28 April 2022) (Ruling)
  • Kenya Medical Laboratory Technicians and Technologists Board & 6 Others v Attorney General
    (2017) eKLR
  • Pravin Bowry v John Ward and Another
    [2015] eKLR
  • Deported Asians Custodian Board v Jafier Brothers Ltd
    [1999] 1 EA 55 (SCU)
Jurisdiction invoked
Original jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court under the Civil Procedure Act and Order 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules (application for joinder in a pending land suit)

Key timeline

#

Practical implications

#

Frequently asked questions

#

Cite this brief

#

Cite this brief

Caselaw, "Mulwa & 21 others v Munyae & 10 others & another (Environment & Land Case 158 of 2017) [2023] KEELC 648 (KLR)", Case Analysis (2023). Not stated in judgment (Application dated September 16, 2022). Source: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2023/648/eng@2023-02-13

Suggested citation format for research notes or client memos. Always verify the original judgment before relying on any point.